Inter-laboratories comparison of different numerical models to four experimental datasets of human vertebrae with or without metastases.
Abstract
Bone metastases, remarkably common in the vertebral bodies of advanced cancer patients, are associated with an increased risk of vertebral fracture. To assess vertebral strength, subject-specific biomechanical models have been proposed based on quantitative computed tomography. Such models have been evaluated on a single dedicated dataset often acquired by the same team. The goal of this paper is to compare different biomechanical models with four experimental datasets to strengthen their validation. Finite element models developed by three groups at the University of Bern, University of Lyon, and "Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak" of Paris, were used to simulate the strength of four different experiments that included 1) intact non-metastatic vertebrae with endplates embedded in endcaps during experimental tests, vertebrae with simulated defects representing osteolytic bone metastasis foci with endplates removed, and metastatic vertebrae from cancer donors with the endplates removed. The simulation results show the determination coefficient to range between 0.28 and 0.96 with a slope of the correlation between experimental and numerical failure strengths from 0.32 to 1.69. The bias (difference between experimental and numerical failure strengths) varied from -3749 and + 1368 N, corresponding to -48.6% to +77%. The experimental removal of the endplates influenced FE model predictions. This study illustrates the need for extensive validation of models before their potential use in clinical practice. To encourage such validation, the experimental datasets were made available in open data.
Related
- Interlaboratory comparison of molecular detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis in routine diagnostic laboratories
- Aneuploidy profiling among different types of brain metastases reveals a colon cancer-specific chromosomal signature
- A preliminar validation-driven experimental–numerical framework for vaginal delivery simulation
- Is Appearance-Related Social Comparison a Causal Mechanism Underlying Appearance-Related Psychopathology Among Young Adult Women? An Experimental Test
- Analysis of solar collector efficiency utilizing micro-groove channels, swirled ribbon, and square coil improvements: a numerical and experimental study
BibTeX
@article{follet2026interlaboratories,
title = {{Inter-laboratories comparison of different numerical models to four experimental datasets of human vertebrae with or without metastases.}},
author = {Helene Follet and Aurélie Meysen and Valentin Allard and Marc Gardegaront and Aurélie Levillain and Jean-Paul Roux and Francois Bermond and Simone Poncioni and Denis Schenk and Marc Stadelmann and Cécile Heidsieck and Wafa Skalli and Cédric Barrey and Cyrille Confavreux and Jean-Baptiste Pialat and Ron Alkalay and David Mitton},
journal = {Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.jmbbm.2026.107633},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05754557v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Inter-laboratories comparison of different numerical models to four experimental datasets of human vertebrae with or without metastases.
AU - Helene Follet
AU - Aurélie Meysen
AU - Valentin Allard
AU - Marc Gardegaront
AU - Aurélie Levillain
AU - Jean-Paul Roux
AU - Francois Bermond
AU - Simone Poncioni
AU - Denis Schenk
AU - Marc Stadelmann
AU - Cécile Heidsieck
AU - Wafa Skalli
AU - Cédric Barrey
AU - Cyrille Confavreux
AU - Jean-Baptiste Pialat
AU - Ron Alkalay
AU - David Mitton
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
DO - 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2026.107633
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05754557v1
AB - Bone metastases, remarkably common in the vertebral bodies of advanced cancer patients, are associated with an increased risk of vertebral fracture. To assess vertebral strength, subject-specific biomechanical models have been proposed based on quantitative computed tomography. Such models have been evaluated on a single dedicated dataset often acquired by the same team. The goal of this paper is to compare different biomechanical models with four experimental datasets to strengthen their validation. Finite element models developed by three groups at the University of Bern, University of Lyon, and "Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak" of Paris, were used to simulate the strength of four different experiments that included 1) intact non-metastatic vertebrae with endplates embedded in endcaps during experimental tests, vertebrae with simulated defects representing osteolytic bone metastasis foci with endplates removed, and metastatic vertebrae from cancer donors with the endplates removed. The simulation results show the determination coefficient to range between 0.28 and 0.96 with a slope of the correlation between experimental and numerical failure strengths from 0.32 to 1.69. The bias (difference between experimental and numerical failure strengths) varied from -3749 and + 1368 N, corresponding to -48.6% to +77%. The experimental removal of the endplates influenced FE model predictions. This study illustrates the need for extensive validation of models before their potential use in clinical practice. To encourage such validation, the experimental datasets were made available in open data.
SN - 1751-6161
SN - 1878-0180
ER -