Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Sequential Supersaturated Screening Experiments

Abstract

Supersaturated screening experiments study many candidate factors with few runs. The experimenter must first identify the active factors, then optimize the response. One-shot regularized regression tends to select many factors, and the second-order response surface model in the selected factors is then large and needs many further runs to fit. We propose Sequential Supersaturated Screening (S3), a two-stage framework for supersaturated designs. S3 builds each screening round by coordinate exchange under a new positive-cone design criterion that uses no practitioner-chosen Welch calibration constant. It then removes low-importance factors one round at a time, using a graduated quantile rule. The criterion scores a design by how far its column correlations sit above the Welch lower bound, and it adapts to the current number of runs and candidate factors. We give a round-by-round bound on the probability that a noise factor is ever fixed, under conditions on noise survival and commitment at each round, together with an explicit upper bound on the total number of Stage 1 runs. Across simulated screening problems and the Borehole benchmark, S3 achieves lower Type I error and higher F1 scores than one-shot cross-validated Lasso (LassoCV). It also improves optimization quality in most settings and runs faster.

Related

  1. Optimizing Social Utility in Sequential Experiments
    Ander Artola Velasco, Stratis Tsirtsis, Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. When AI Generates Covariates: Causal Typing and Estimand Drift in Sequential Experiments
    Takes Fujita, Nobutaka Hattori
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBioinformatics & computational biologyStatisticsarXiv
  3. Regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with many covariates
    Harold D. Chiang, Yukitoshi Matsushita, Taisuke Otsu
    Journal of EconometricsPeer-reviewedLicence not stated13 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  4. On the efficiency of highly stratified experiments
    Yuehao Bai, Jizhou Liu, Azeem M. Shaikh +1
    The Annals of StatisticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text25 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  5. Fisher's Ideas and the Design of Field Experiments in Agronomy and Plant Breeding
    Hans‐Peter Piepho
    Biometrical journal. Biometrische ZeitschriftPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textStatisticsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{han2026sequential,
  title = {{Sequential Supersaturated Screening Experiments}},
  author = {Songqiao Han and Kalliopi Mylona and Steven Gilmour and Matteo Borrotti},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.37756},
  eprint = {2609.37756},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37756},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sequential Supersaturated Screening Experiments
AU  - Songqiao Han
AU  - Kalliopi Mylona
AU  - Steven Gilmour
AU  - Matteo Borrotti
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.37756
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37756
AB  - Supersaturated screening experiments study many candidate factors with few runs. The experimenter must first identify the active factors, then optimize the response. One-shot regularized regression tends to select many factors, and the second-order response surface model in the selected factors is then large and needs many further runs to fit. We propose Sequential Supersaturated Screening (S^3), a two-stage framework for supersaturated designs. S^3 builds each screening round by coordinate exchange under a new positive-cone design criterion that uses no practitioner-chosen Welch calibration constant. It then removes low-importance factors one round at a time, using a graduated quantile rule. The criterion scores a design by how far its column correlations sit above the Welch lower bound, and it adapts to the current number of runs and candidate factors. We give a round-by-round bound on the probability that a noise factor is ever fixed, under conditions on noise survival and commitment at each round, together with an explicit upper bound on the total number of Stage 1 runs. Across simulated screening problems and the Borehole benchmark, S^3 achieves lower Type I error and higher F_1 scores than one-shot cross-validated Lasso (LassoCV). It also improves optimization quality in most settings and runs faster.
ER  -