The Galactic Black Hole mass distribution
Abstract
The population of extragalactic black holes has been significantly expanded and better understood since the first detection of gravitational waves. Over the past decade, approximately 290 events have been confirmed to involve at least one black hole. In contrast, the galactic black hole population has grown at a much slower pace, with only 42 systems possessing mass estimates, while the vast majority remain as candidates. In this work, we present the first update of a Bayesian analysis of the mass distribution of galactic black holes since 2011, previously based on a sample of 15 low-mass X-ray binaries and 5 high-mass X-ray binaries. Our update includes 28 low-mass X-ray binaries, 6 high-mass X-ray binaries, 7 detached binaries and 1 isolated black hole, also present in the living catalog \textit{CatNoir} which we introduce. We apply a Bayesian framework using five parametric models -- Gaussian, two-Gaussian, log-normal, power-law, and decaying exponential -- and compare their performance in fitting the observed data. Furthermore, we inspect the effect of removing model-dependent systems from the sample. Our results suggest that the power law better describes the Combined sample, while the Gaussian is preferred for the LMXB-only sample, closely followed by the two-Gaussian and log-normal. We derive the 1%-quantile of the preferred model's posterior predictive distribution to access information about the lower mass gap. For the Combined and LMXB Samples, we find M1% > 4.06 M⊙ and M1% > 2.56 M⊙ (at 90% C.I.), respectively. The LMXB result allows for the existence of a sparsely populated Gap, instead of a completely empty one.
Related
- Good things always come in 3s: Trimodality in the binary black-hole chirp-mass distribution supports bimodal black-hole formation
- The Mass-Ratio Distribution of the Low-Mass Binary Black Hole Subpopulation: A Natural Outcome of Isolated Binary Evolution
- Aligned Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Active-Galactic-Nuclei Disks Revealed by GWTC-4
- The black hole--galaxy correlations of the 12,μm local active galactic nucleus sample: A NuSTAR perspective
- Constraining Ultralight Scalars with Black Hole Binary Mergers in Galactic Nuclei
BibTeX
@misc{rocha2026galactic,
title = {{The Galactic Black Hole mass distribution}},
author = {L S. Rocha and N. Pires and L. M. de Sá and B. B. Martins and L. G. Barão and G. R. C. Sampaio and D. V. Rodrigues and R. M. G. Takahashi and M. G. B. de Avellar and J. E. Horvath and A. Bernardo},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.14154},
eprint = {2609.14154},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14154},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The Galactic Black Hole mass distribution
AU - L S. Rocha
AU - N. Pires
AU - L. M. de Sá
AU - B. B. Martins
AU - L. G. Barão
AU - G. R. C. Sampaio
AU - D. V. Rodrigues
AU - R. M. G. Takahashi
AU - M. G. B. de Avellar
AU - J. E. Horvath
AU - A. Bernardo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/12
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.14154
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14154
AB - The population of extragalactic black holes has been significantly expanded and better understood since the first detection of gravitational waves. Over the past decade, approximately 290 events have been confirmed to involve at least one black hole. In contrast, the galactic black hole population has grown at a much slower pace, with only 42 systems possessing mass estimates, while the vast majority remain as candidates. In this work, we present the first update of a Bayesian analysis of the mass distribution of galactic black holes since 2011, previously based on a sample of 15 low-mass X-ray binaries and 5 high-mass X-ray binaries. Our update includes 28 low-mass X-ray binaries, 6 high-mass X-ray binaries, 7 detached binaries and 1 isolated black hole, also present in the living catalog \textit{CatNoir} which we introduce. We apply a Bayesian framework using five parametric models -- Gaussian, two-Gaussian, log-normal, power-law, and decaying exponential -- and compare their performance in fitting the observed data. Furthermore, we inspect the effect of removing model-dependent systems from the sample. Our results suggest that the power law better describes the Combined sample, while the Gaussian is preferred for the LMXB-only sample, closely followed by the two-Gaussian and log-normal. We derive the 1%-quantile of the preferred model's posterior predictive distribution to access information about the lower mass gap. For the Combined and LMXB Samples, we find M_1% > 4.06 M_⊙ and M_1% > 2.56 M_⊙ (at 90% C.I.), respectively. The LMXB result allows for the existence of a sparsely populated Gap, instead of a completely empty one.
ER -