Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Intestinal Parasitic Infection Positivity Rates Among Clinically Suspected Patients at a Tertiary Centre in Northern India: A Four-Year Retrospective Analysis

4 affiliations
  1. 1Microbiology, Government Medical College, Haridwar, Haridwar, IND
  2. 2Microbiology, Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, New Delhi, IND
  3. 3Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND
  4. 4Public Health, International Institute of Health Management Research, Delhi, IND

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic changed healthcare-seeking behaviour and clinical priorities, potentially influencing the detection of intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs). Data evaluating these effects remain limited.Objective

The primary objective was to assess changes in the laboratory positivity rate of intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) among clinically suspected patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the period of empirical ivermectin use. The secondary objective was to compare IPI positivity rates across different age and gender groups over the study period.Methodology

This was a retrospective laboratory-based observational study conducted at AIIMS Rishikesh from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022. Stool samples underwent macroscopic examination, saline and iodine wet-mount microscopy, and modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining for coccidian parasites. The timeline was divided into three policy-defined periods: pre-COVID (January 1 to December 31, 2019), early COVID-19/ivermectin-included period (January 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021), and late COVID-19/post-ivermectin period (September 1, 2021-December 31, 2022). We applied a chi-square test and Bonferroni correction. Effect sizes are reported as prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results

Of 5,389 samples, 97 (1.80%) were confirmed positive for IPIs; 103 parasites were isolated from 97 patients, with five patients harbouring co-infections. Overall positivity rates were highest in the age group of 41-50 years (3.00%; 13/433) and comparable between male (1.88%; 64/3,405) and female (1.66%; 33/1,984) patients. The pre-COVID positivity rate (2.78%; 37/1,330) exceeded that of the early COVID period (1.14%; 17/1,493; PR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.38-4.32; p = 0.001). Protozoa predominated, with Giardia lamblia being the most frequent (44.66%; 46/103 parasites isolated). Following ivermectin withdrawal, positivity declined transiently (0.14%; 1/692; 95% CI: 0.03%-0.81%) before resurging (2.24%; 42/1,874).Conclusion

Laboratory positivity for IPIs among patients with clinical suspicion fell during the initial COVID-19 period, most likely due to decreased healthcare-seeking and changes in referral patterns rather than a real shift in parasite prevalence at the community level. The observed temporal association with ivermectin use is only hypothesis-generating because individual-level treatment information is not available. Prospective, controlled studies that confirm ivermectin exposure data are required.

Related

  1. Cerebral Manifestation of Miliary Tuberculosis Mimicking a Parasitic CNS Infection.
    Daniel Martens, Fatma Merzou, Nils Schroeter +4
    Case reports in neurological medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. HEALTH EDUCATION FOR THE PREVENTION OF ANEMIA AND INTESTINAL PARASITIC INFECTIONS AMONG PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENTS: A MULTIPROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE FROM 2022.1 TO 2026.1
    Brenda Pereira da SILVA, José Pereira Moura NETO, Gracineide Pereira SILVA +7
    Hematology, Transfusion and Cell TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEndocrinology & metabolismDOAJ
  3. ACE2 Polymorphisms rs2285666 and rs147311723 Are Clinically Relevant Variants in SARS-CoV-2 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis Co-infection.
    M. N. Kameni, A. A. Jean Paul, E. Berenger Tchoupe +8
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textInfectious diseasemedRxiv
  4. Association of Postoperative Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio with Suspected Infection, Culture Positivity, Sepsis, and Septic Shock in 1408 Patients After Cranial Neurosurgery
    Dong Tang, Tianxiang Huang
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Tranexamic acid use and progression to clinically important bleeding in critically ill patients with non-clinically important non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study
    Ji Luo, Zheng Lei, Yuanjun Zhang +8
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{kamboj2026impact,
  title = {{Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Intestinal Parasitic Infection Positivity Rates Among Clinically Suspected Patients at a Tertiary Centre in Northern India: A Four-Year Retrospective Analysis}},
  author = {Pratiksha Kamboj and Deepika Chakraborty and Yogendra P Mathuria and Sandipta Charkraborty and Binal Mangroliya and Sindura Sudhakar and Tanisha Sharma and NIdhi Soni},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.117132},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13717814},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Intestinal Parasitic Infection Positivity Rates Among Clinically Suspected Patients at a Tertiary Centre in Northern India: A Four-Year Retrospective Analysis
AU  - Pratiksha Kamboj
AU  - Deepika Chakraborty
AU  - Yogendra P Mathuria
AU  - Sandipta Charkraborty
AU  - Binal Mangroliya
AU  - Sindura Sudhakar
AU  - Tanisha Sharma
AU  - NIdhi Soni
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.117132
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13717814
AB  - Background  The COVID-19 pandemic changed healthcare-seeking behaviour and clinical priorities, potentially influencing the detection of intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs). Data evaluating these effects remain limited.Objective  The primary objective was to assess changes in the laboratory positivity rate of intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) among clinically suspected patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the period of empirical ivermectin use. The secondary objective was to compare IPI positivity rates across different age and gender groups over the study period.Methodology  This was a retrospective laboratory-based observational study conducted at AIIMS Rishikesh from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022. Stool samples underwent macroscopic examination, saline and iodine wet-mount microscopy, and modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining for coccidian parasites. The timeline was divided into three policy-defined periods: pre-COVID (January 1 to December 31, 2019), early COVID-19/ivermectin-included period (January 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021), and late COVID-19/post-ivermectin period (September 1, 2021-December 31, 2022). We applied a chi-square test and Bonferroni correction. Effect sizes are reported as prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results  Of 5,389 samples, 97 (1.80%) were confirmed positive for IPIs; 103 parasites were isolated from 97 patients, with five patients harbouring co-infections. Overall positivity rates were highest in the age group of 41-50 years (3.00%; 13/433) and comparable between male (1.88%; 64/3,405) and female (1.66%; 33/1,984) patients. The pre-COVID positivity rate (2.78%; 37/1,330) exceeded that of the early COVID period (1.14%; 17/1,493; PR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.38-4.32; p = 0.001). Protozoa predominated, with Giardia lamblia being the most frequent (44.66%; 46/103 parasites isolated). Following ivermectin withdrawal, positivity declined transiently (0.14%; 1/692; 95% CI: 0.03%-0.81%) before resurging (2.24%; 42/1,874).Conclusion  Laboratory positivity for IPIs among patients with clinical suspicion fell during the initial COVID-19 period, most likely due to decreased healthcare-seeking and changes in referral patterns rather than a real shift in parasite prevalence at the community level. The observed temporal association with ivermectin use is only hypothesis-generating because individual-level treatment information is not available. Prospective, controlled studies that confirm ivermectin exposure data are required.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -