Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Label-free cell counting and viability prediction with brightfield imaging and deep learning

Abstract

Cell viability assessment is a core requirement in cell culture systems, with critical applications in biopharmaceutical manufacturing and drug development. Conventionally, it is measured by adding membrane-impermeable dyes to a sample (a process called staining), which allows compromised cell membranes to be distinguished from intact ones. However, staining has several limitations: (a) chemical agents can perturb normal cellular processes of the cells being measured, (b) it is often ambiguous to assign viability to individual cells whose membrane integrity is only partially compromised, (c) photobleaching can undermine measurement accuracy over time when using fluorescent stains, and (d) staining cannot be performed in situ or in real time. Here, we show that (1) stained cells captured under brightfield imaging contain sufficient information to distinguish live and dead cells, and (2) cells captured under unstained brightfield imaging exhibit similar image features to their stained counterparts, enabling models trained on stained cells to generalize to unstained ones. We then report the development and validation of ViabiLens, an AI-assisted software tool for label-free cell viability analysis. ViabiLens combines a cell detection model for localizing individual cells with a convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier for live/dead prediction, paired with an interactive UMAP-based viewer for visualizing and exploring individual cells across the sample. Evaluated on Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells spanning a wide range of viability conditions, ViabiLens achieves a mean absolute error of 2.33\% on unstained samples against fluorescence-based reference measurements. The demo of ViabiLens software is available at https://amirrezavazifeh.github.io/ViabiLens-Project-Page/.

Related

  1. CountAnywhere: frugal cell counting and viability from smartphone hemocytometer photos
    M. Yang, M. Mamo, A. Usmani +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  2. An automated ranking platform for machine learning regression models for meat spoilage prediction using multi-spectral imaging and metabolic profiling
    Lucia Estelles-Lopez, Athina Ropodi, Dimitris Pavlidis +6
    Food Research InternationalPeer-reviewedLicence not stated86 citedGeneral biologyStatisticsHAL
  3. Optimizing x-ray based multimodal imaging: investigating dose dependency and modulation of fluorescence emission from GdF ₃ nanoparticles doped with terbium using spectral photon counting CT
    Pia Akl, Arthur Gautheron, Maria Nicole Antonuccio +12
    Physics in Medicine and BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyBiological & medical physicsHAL
  4. PURELIGHT: a quantitative photon-counting framework unifying intensity and lifetime imaging at video rate across detector technologies
    F. Velasquez Moros, D. Amiet, D. Skwarzynska +14
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Temperature dependence of pollen germination in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii): A machine learning-based detection of pollen viability from microscopic images
    H.-W. Hsu, S. Zerrade, S.-H. Kim
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textEcologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{vazifeh2026labelfree,
  title = {{Label-free cell counting and viability prediction with brightfield imaging and deep learning}},
  author = {Amir Reza Vazifeh and Christian Zeigler and Sornanathan Meyyappan and Richard Jeske and Jason W. Fleischer},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.10473},
  eprint = {2610.10473},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10473},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Label-free cell counting and viability prediction with brightfield imaging and deep learning
AU  - Amir Reza Vazifeh
AU  - Christian Zeigler
AU  - Sornanathan Meyyappan
AU  - Richard Jeske
AU  - Jason W. Fleischer
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.10473
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10473
AB  - Cell viability assessment is a core requirement in cell culture systems, with critical applications in biopharmaceutical manufacturing and drug development. Conventionally, it is measured by adding membrane-impermeable dyes to a sample (a process called staining), which allows compromised cell membranes to be distinguished from intact ones. However, staining has several limitations: (a) chemical agents can perturb normal cellular processes of the cells being measured, (b) it is often ambiguous to assign viability to individual cells whose membrane integrity is only partially compromised, (c) photobleaching can undermine measurement accuracy over time when using fluorescent stains, and (d) staining cannot be performed in situ or in real time. Here, we show that (1) stained cells captured under brightfield imaging contain sufficient information to distinguish live and dead cells, and (2) cells captured under unstained brightfield imaging exhibit similar image features to their stained counterparts, enabling models trained on stained cells to generalize to unstained ones. We then report the development and validation of ViabiLens, an AI-assisted software tool for label-free cell viability analysis. ViabiLens combines a cell detection model for localizing individual cells with a convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier for live/dead prediction, paired with an interactive UMAP-based viewer for visualizing and exploring individual cells across the sample. Evaluated on Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells spanning a wide range of viability conditions, ViabiLens achieves a mean absolute error of 2.33\% on unstained samples against fluorescence-based reference measurements. The demo of ViabiLens software is available at https://amirrezavazifeh.github.io/ViabiLens-Project-Page/.
ER  -