Predicting Marital Distress Based on Phubbing Behavior and Rejection Sensitivity Among Married Adults: A Cross-Sectional Predictive Study
- 1M.A. in Social Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract
Objective: This study examined whether perceived partner phubbing and rejection sensitivity predict marital distress among married adults, and whether rejection sensitivity moderates the association between phubbing and marital distress.
Methods and Materials: Using a cross-sectional design in 2025, 260 married adults from Mashhad completed self-report measures of marital distress (reverse-scored Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale), perceived partner phubbing (Partner Phubbing Scale), rejection sensitivity (Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire), and demographic variables. Pearson correlations assessed bivariate associations. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses examined the incremental predictive value of phubbing and rejection sensitivity beyond demographics. A moderated regression model tested the interaction between phubbing and rejection sensitivity.
Results: Marital distress correlated positively with partner phubbing (r = .41, p < .001) and rejection sensitivity (r = .47, p < .001). In regression analyses, demographics explained 7% of the variance in marital distress. Adding partner phubbing increased explained variance to 18%. Including rejection sensitivity further increased explained variance to 30%; both phubbing (β = .25, p < .001) and rejection sensitivity (β = .39, p < .001) were significant predictors. Moderation analysis showed a significant interaction (β = .16, p = .008, ΔR² = .02): the association between phubbing and marital distress was stronger at higher levels of rejection sensitivity.
Conclusions: Perceived partner phubbing and rejection sensitivity jointly and uniquely predict marital distress. Rejection-sensitive spouses appear particularly vulnerable to the relational costs of phubbing, underscoring the need to address both digital-boundary behaviors and rejection-related cognitions in couple interventions.
Related
- Characterizing Rejection Sensitivity in Autistic Adolescents and Implications for Depression and Anxiety Symptoms
- The relationships of parenting styles, self-esteem and rejection sensitivity: a latent profile analysis
- Neural sensitivity to peer rejection predicts depressive symptoms and daily mood in adolescents
- Assessing fertility-related quality of life and psychological distress among infertile women: A cross-sectional study
- Construction of a five-gene prognostic model involving T cell exhaustion and metabolic reprogramming for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma risk using LASSO: insights into immune infiltration and drug sensitivity
BibTeX
@article{rezvan2026predicting,
title = {{Predicting Marital Distress Based on Phubbing Behavior and Rejection Sensitivity Among Married Adults: A Cross-Sectional Predictive Study}},
author = {Mahin Rezvan},
journal = {International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.61838/ijbmc.v14i2.774},
url = {https://doi.org/10.61838/ijbmc.v14i2.774},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Predicting Marital Distress Based on Phubbing Behavior and Rejection Sensitivity Among Married Adults: A Cross-Sectional Predictive Study
AU - Mahin Rezvan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture
DO - 10.61838/ijbmc.v14i2.774
UR - https://doi.org/10.61838/ijbmc.v14i2.774
AB - Objective: This study examined whether perceived partner phubbing and rejection sensitivity predict marital distress among married adults, and whether rejection sensitivity moderates the association between phubbing and marital distress. Methods and Materials: Using a cross-sectional design in 2025, 260 married adults from Mashhad completed self-report measures of marital distress (reverse-scored Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale), perceived partner phubbing (Partner Phubbing Scale), rejection sensitivity (Adult Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire), and demographic variables. Pearson correlations assessed bivariate associations. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses examined the incremental predictive value of phubbing and rejection sensitivity beyond demographics. A moderated regression model tested the interaction between phubbing and rejection sensitivity. Results: Marital distress correlated positively with partner phubbing (r = .41, p < .001) and rejection sensitivity (r = .47, p < .001). In regression analyses, demographics explained 7% of the variance in marital distress. Adding partner phubbing increased explained variance to 18%. Including rejection sensitivity further increased explained variance to 30%; both phubbing (β = .25, p < .001) and rejection sensitivity (β = .39, p < .001) were significant predictors. Moderation analysis showed a significant interaction (β = .16, p = .008, ΔR² = .02): the association between phubbing and marital distress was stronger at higher levels of rejection sensitivity. Conclusions: Perceived partner phubbing and rejection sensitivity jointly and uniquely predict marital distress. Rejection-sensitive spouses appear particularly vulnerable to the relational costs of phubbing, underscoring the need to address both digital-boundary behaviors and rejection-related cognitions in couple interventions.
SN - 2345-5802
ER -