Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,788 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)

Quality of Life in a Saudi Arabian Sample of Parents and Caregivers of Children with Disabilities: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

  1. 1Department of Special Education, College of Education, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.
  2. 2Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Background: Raising a child with a disability can affect multiple dimensions of caregiver quality of life (QoL), but caregiver experiences vary according to child, family, and service characteristics. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess QoL in a Saudi Arabian sample of parents and caregivers of children with disabilities using the Arabic Multicultural Quality of Life Index (MQLI-Ar) and to examine factors associated with total MQLI score. Methods: In this exploratory cross-sectional study, 336 adult parents/caregivers were recruited through specialized disability centers and associated parent networks using non-probability convenience sampling. QoL was measured with the 10-item MQLI-Ar. Bivariate associations were examined using t-tests/ANOVA, and adjusted associations were evaluated using multivariable linear regression. For the multivariable model, disability status was represented by mutually exclusive diagnostic profiles. Results: Among 336 participants, 75.9% were mothers and 60.1% resided in the Makkah region. The mean total MQLI score was 7.08 (SD = 2.28). The primary model was significant (F(15,320) = 2.89, p < 0.001, R² = 0.119) (adjusted R² = 0.078), and diagnostic profile was associated with MQLI score overall (p = 0.004). Relative to the autism-only group, higher adjusted scores were observed for learning difficulties only (B = 1.22, p = 0.009) and other disability only (B = 0.78, p = 0.030); the remaining diagnostic-profile contrasts were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Overall QoL was moderate to high in this caregiver sample, but QoL differed across diagnostic profiles. These exploratory cross-sectional findings should be interpreted cautiously given the non-probability sample, geographic concentration, modest model explanatory power, and unmeasured clinical and caregiving factors.

Related

  1. Psychological therapy for children and young people with a diagnosis of autism or intellectual disabilities in mainstream child and adolescent mental health services: a cross-sectional survey of clinicians’ perspectives in England
    Naomi Williams, Helena Tuomainen, Julie Taylor +6
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral medicineCrossref
  2. Beyond benchmarks: a narrative review of evolving quality of life frameworks for children with neurodevelopmental and learning disabilities and the need for integrated digital twin approaches
    R Sterling Snead
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Urban–Rural Differences in Quality of Life among Families of Children with Disabilities in Bulgaria
    RH Chamova, SP Nikolova, AB Toneva
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMCEurope PMC
  4. Constructing the Self Data Atlas ontology: a crisp-fuzzy ontology for quality of life representation in children with neurodevelopmental and learning disabilities
    R Sterling Snead
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Quality of life domains among caregivers of children with special health care needs in South Asia: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Malshani Lakshika Pathirathna, Motoko Tanaka, Emi Kamono +2
    International journal for equity in healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{alghamdi2026quality,
  title = {{Quality of Life in a Saudi Arabian Sample of Parents and Caregivers of Children with Disabilities: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.}},
  author = {Abdullah Ahmed Alghamdi and Majed Ahmed Algarni and Mohammad S Alzahrani},
  journal = {Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/healthcare14203525},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42940570},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Quality of Life in a Saudi Arabian Sample of Parents and Caregivers of Children with Disabilities: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
AU  - Abdullah Ahmed Alghamdi
AU  - Majed Ahmed Algarni
AU  - Mohammad S Alzahrani
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/healthcare14203525
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42940570
AB  - Background: Raising a child with a disability can affect multiple dimensions of caregiver quality of life (QoL), but caregiver experiences vary according to child, family, and service characteristics. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess QoL in a Saudi Arabian sample of parents and caregivers of children with disabilities using the Arabic Multicultural Quality of Life Index (MQLI-Ar) and to examine factors associated with total MQLI score. Methods: In this exploratory cross-sectional study, 336 adult parents/caregivers were recruited through specialized disability centers and associated parent networks using non-probability convenience sampling. QoL was measured with the 10-item MQLI-Ar. Bivariate associations were examined using t-tests/ANOVA, and adjusted associations were evaluated using multivariable linear regression. For the multivariable model, disability status was represented by mutually exclusive diagnostic profiles. Results: Among 336 participants, 75.9% were mothers and 60.1% resided in the Makkah region. The mean total MQLI score was 7.08 (SD = 2.28). The primary model was significant (F(15,320) = 2.89, p < 0.001, R² = 0.119) (adjusted R² = 0.078), and diagnostic profile was associated with MQLI score overall (p = 0.004). Relative to the autism-only group, higher adjusted scores were observed for learning difficulties only (B = 1.22, p = 0.009) and other disability only (B = 0.78, p = 0.030); the remaining diagnostic-profile contrasts were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Overall QoL was moderate to high in this caregiver sample, but QoL differed across diagnostic profiles. These exploratory cross-sectional findings should be interpreted cautiously given the non-probability sample, geographic concentration, modest model explanatory power, and unmeasured clinical and caregiving factors.
SN  - 2227-9032
ER  -