Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Sports Health

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Large Retrospective Analysis

  1. 1Department of Primary Care Sports Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York

Abstract

Background:: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is used increasingly to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to describe PRP use for knee OA and identify patient- and treatment-specific factors associated with clinical outcomes.

Hypothesis:: Patients with knee OA undergoing intra-articular PRP injections would demonstrate improvement in pain, function, and symptoms over time, with outcomes varying by patient and treatment characteristics.

Study Design:: Retrospective cohort study.

Level of Evidence:: Level 3.

Methods:: A total of 743 patients with knee OA were treated with intra-articular PRP injections. Outcomes were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-100, higher scores indicating greater pain) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR). Change in patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores from baseline and achievement of patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were measured. Repeated-measures mixed models evaluated outcomes at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year using an all-response analysis (391 patients for Pain NRS; 400 for KOOS-JR).

Results:: PRP injections were associated with improvement in pain, function, and symptom state. Pain NRS improved from 39.2 at baseline to 27.2 at 6 months and 22.4 at 1 year (both P < 0.001), while KOOS-JR improved from 60.7 to 68.5 and 69.1 (both P < 0.001), with similar findings in the complete-case cohort. When stratified by radiographic severity, patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 1 to 3 improved in both outcomes at 6 months and 1 year, while patients with KL grade 4 improved in Pain NRS at 1 year (P < 0.001) and KOOS-JR at 6 months (P = 0.01) and 1 year (P = 0.001). PASS achievement rates increased over time for both pain and function.

Conclusion:: Intra-articular PRP injections were associated with improvements in pain, function, and symptoms in patients with knee OA. Differences between complete-case and all-response analyses suggest that follow-up patterns may influence estimated treatment response.

Clinical Relevance:: These findings describe patient-reported outcomes after intra-articular PRP injection for knee OA. Because this study lacked a control group, findings should not be interpreted as evidence that PRP caused the observed improvements.

Related

  1. Recorded Adverse Events and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Intra-articular Extracellular-Vesicle Product Administration for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Single-Practice Case Series
    Jonathan Courtney, Cassandra Cortese, Kaitlyn Hollman
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. The Impact of Hip Osteoarthritis on Patient Reported Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion
    Ali Farooqi, Joshua Mathew, Mitchell Ng +23
    Global Spine JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Explorative Correlation of Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool with Minimal Disease Activity Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Treated with Upadacitinib: A Retrospective Real-world Study
    Filomena Russo, Natale Schettini, Giovanni Scaglione +20
    Acta Dermato-VenereologicaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineDOAJEurope PMCPMC
  4. Prevalence, Risk Indicators, and Patient‐Reported Outcomes of Labial Gingival Recession Following Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Study
    Sarah Benabdallah, Parham Hazrati, Catherine Delcourt +5
    Clinical and experimental dental researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCDOAJ
  5. Comparative effectiveness of exercise and self-management interventions delivered through different modes of digital support on pain and patient-reported physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hao Luo, Guoqing Zhang, Lingyun Long +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{coss2026plateletrich,
  title = {{Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Large Retrospective Analysis}},
  author = {Jonathan P. Coss and Kenar Z. Gelman and Ryan Lingor and Kaylre Greaves and Courtney Melone and Michael Parides and Brian C. Halpern},
  journal = {Sports Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1177/19417381261496039},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381261496039},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Large Retrospective Analysis
AU  - Jonathan P. Coss
AU  - Kenar Z. Gelman
AU  - Ryan Lingor
AU  - Kaylre Greaves
AU  - Courtney Melone
AU  - Michael Parides
AU  - Brian C. Halpern
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Sports Health
DO  - 10.1177/19417381261496039
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381261496039
AB  - Background:: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is used increasingly to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to describe PRP use for knee OA and identify patient- and treatment-specific factors associated with clinical outcomes.  Hypothesis:: Patients with knee OA undergoing intra-articular PRP injections would demonstrate improvement in pain, function, and symptoms over time, with outcomes varying by patient and treatment characteristics.  Study Design:: Retrospective cohort study.  Level of Evidence:: Level 3.  Methods:: A total of 743 patients with knee OA were treated with intra-articular PRP injections. Outcomes were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-100, higher scores indicating greater pain) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR). Change in patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores from baseline and achievement of patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were measured. Repeated-measures mixed models evaluated outcomes at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year using an all-response analysis (391 patients for Pain NRS; 400 for KOOS-JR).  Results:: PRP injections were associated with improvement in pain, function, and symptom state. Pain NRS improved from 39.2 at baseline to 27.2 at 6 months and 22.4 at 1 year (both P < 0.001), while KOOS-JR improved from 60.7 to 68.5 and 69.1 (both P < 0.001), with similar findings in the complete-case cohort. When stratified by radiographic severity, patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 1 to 3 improved in both outcomes at 6 months and 1 year, while patients with KL grade 4 improved in Pain NRS at 1 year (P < 0.001) and KOOS-JR at 6 months (P = 0.01) and 1 year (P = 0.001). PASS achievement rates increased over time for both pain and function.  Conclusion:: Intra-articular PRP injections were associated with improvements in pain, function, and symptoms in patients with knee OA. Differences between complete-case and all-response analyses suggest that follow-up patterns may influence estimated treatment response.  Clinical Relevance:: These findings describe patient-reported outcomes after intra-articular PRP injection for knee OA. Because this study lacked a control group, findings should not be interpreted as evidence that PRP caused the observed improvements.
SN  - 1941-7381
SN  - 1941-0921
ER  -