Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Logarithmic-Depth Fermion Sampling: Anticoncentration and Average-Case Hardness

Abstract

Sampling problems give some of the clearest conditional separations between quantum and classical computation. In Fermion Sampling, passive linear optics acts on a non-Gaussian magic input. Globally Haar-random transformations give anticoncentration and high-precision average-case hardness, but require linear depth and quadratically many gates. A natural open question is whether linear depth is necessary? We show that logarithmic depth suffices for both guarantees in the same ensemble. For fresh uniform matchings with independent Haar two-mode gates, the collision reaches the passive-Haar scale at a sharp threshold of log n/log(9/4)≈0.855log2 n layers, with an explicit limiting transition profile and a matching lower bound from two-particle correlations. The mechanism is input-dependent: the magic input suppresses the extensive weight of the slowest relaxation mode, leaving the next to set the scale. An occupation-basis input retains large collision even under full Haar randomness. At a larger logarithmic depth, we prove, in the real-RAM model, average-case #P-hardness of estimating output probabilities to additive error 2−O(nlog2 n) on any fixed fraction of instances above 3/4. We construct hard instances in four native layers, embed them in typical schedules, and interpolate along Cayley paths using a rational linear-program decoder. A finite $192$-gate alphabet preserves the collision law exactly. Both guarantees use logarithmic native fermionic depth between arbitrary mode pairs and O(nlog n) gates, replacing the global-Haar construction's quadratic budget. The accuracy proved is finer than the 1/N scale, where N=binomnn/2, required by sampling-to-counting; hardness of sampling within constant total-variation distance remains open.

Related

  1. Anticoncentration and entanglement in Gaussian boson sampling
    Laura Shou, Adam Ehrenberg, Yu-Xin Wang +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Local Anticoncentration for Gaussian Boson Sampling via Conditional Wishart Geometry
    Hongru Zhao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Average-case hardness of Betti number estimation
    Sergii Strelchuk, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian, Adam Wesołowski
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. On Certifying Source Sampling Hardness in Quantum Generative Modeling
    Chen-Yu Liu, Leonardo Placidi, Enrico Rinaldi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Polynomial-time classical simulation of boson and fermion sampling under thermal loss
    Armando Angrisani, Hela Mhiri
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsOptics & photonicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mathur2026logarithmicdepth,
  title = {{Logarithmic-Depth Fermion Sampling: Anticoncentration and Average-Case Hardness}},
  author = {Natansh Mathur and Iordanis Kerenidis},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.40100},
  eprint = {2609.40100},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.40100},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Logarithmic-Depth Fermion Sampling: Anticoncentration and Average-Case Hardness
AU  - Natansh Mathur
AU  - Iordanis Kerenidis
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.40100
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.40100
AB  - Sampling problems give some of the clearest conditional separations between quantum and classical computation. In Fermion Sampling, passive linear optics acts on a non-Gaussian magic input. Globally Haar-random transformations give anticoncentration and high-precision average-case hardness, but require linear depth and quadratically many gates. A natural open question is whether linear depth is necessary? We show that logarithmic depth suffices for both guarantees in the same ensemble. For fresh uniform matchings with independent Haar two-mode gates, the collision reaches the passive-Haar scale at a sharp threshold of log n/log(9/4)≈0.855log_2 n layers, with an explicit limiting transition profile and a matching lower bound from two-particle correlations. The mechanism is input-dependent: the magic input suppresses the extensive weight of the slowest relaxation mode, leaving the next to set the scale. An occupation-basis input retains large collision even under full Haar randomness. At a larger logarithmic depth, we prove, in the real-RAM model, average-case #P-hardness of estimating output probabilities to additive error 2^−O(nlog^2 n) on any fixed fraction of instances above 3/4. We construct hard instances in four native layers, embed them in typical schedules, and interpolate along Cayley paths using a rational linear-program decoder. A finite $192$-gate alphabet preserves the collision law exactly. Both guarantees use logarithmic native fermionic depth between arbitrary mode pairs and O(nlog n) gates, replacing the global-Haar construction's quadratic budget. The accuracy proved is finer than the 1/N scale, where N=binomnn/2, required by sampling-to-counting; hardness of sampling within constant total-variation distance remains open.
ER  -