Pairwise assessment correlations predict cooperation of the Leading Eight under private assessment
Abstract
Indirect reciprocity can sustain cooperation when individuals use reputations to decide whom to help. The Leading Eight norms sustain such cooperation under public assessment, where all individuals share the same assessments. Under private assessment, however, observers may disagree, yet their assessments remain correlated. Two quantities, the average fraction of good assessments h and the conditional probability hG that one observer assesses a player as good given that another does, are known to determine the stability of cooperation, but how hG itself is determined has remained open. Within a pairwise approximation, we derive a closed equation for hG that, together with that for h, determines both quantities for all eight norms, including third-order ones. This description substantially improves agreement with simulations over a mean-field approximation that neglects correlations, and recovers the known classification of the Leading Eight into three classes. The remaining discrepancies are largest for L2 and L5 at low error rates and decrease as assessment error increases. Relating hG to the variance of individual goodness suggests that these discrepancies reflect information beyond the first two moments of the goodness distribution. Our framework provides a concise and analytically tractable tool for evaluating social norms under private assessment.
Related
- Leading-twist proton parton distribution amplitude from scalar and axial-vector diquark correlations
- Accounting for correlations in the ωπ spectral function and its implication on the leading model dependent contribution to the τ- → π-π0 ντγ decay
- Social comparison shapes the evolution of cooperation in structured populations
- Explaining human cooperation through a dual mechanism of individual and social learning
- General solution for network models with pairwise edge coupling
BibTeX
@misc{hong2026pairwise,
title = {{Pairwise assessment correlations predict cooperation of the Leading Eight under private assessment}},
author = {Jong-Won Hong and Sunhee Chae and Hye Jin Park},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.25975},
eprint = {2610.25975},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25975},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Pairwise assessment correlations predict cooperation of the Leading Eight under private assessment
AU - Jong-Won Hong
AU - Sunhee Chae
AU - Hye Jin Park
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.25975
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25975
AB - Indirect reciprocity can sustain cooperation when individuals use reputations to decide whom to help. The Leading Eight norms sustain such cooperation under public assessment, where all individuals share the same assessments. Under private assessment, however, observers may disagree, yet their assessments remain correlated. Two quantities, the average fraction of good assessments h and the conditional probability h_G that one observer assesses a player as good given that another does, are known to determine the stability of cooperation, but how h_G itself is determined has remained open. Within a pairwise approximation, we derive a closed equation for h_G that, together with that for h, determines both quantities for all eight norms, including third-order ones. This description substantially improves agreement with simulations over a mean-field approximation that neglects correlations, and recovers the known classification of the Leading Eight into three classes. The remaining discrepancies are largest for L2 and L5 at low error rates and decrease as assessment error increases. Relating h_G to the variance of individual goodness suggests that these discrepancies reflect information beyond the first two moments of the goodness distribution. Our framework provides a concise and analytically tractable tool for evaluating social norms under private assessment.
ER -