Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,716 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Nutrients

Beyond Average Sex Differences: A Bayesian Analysis of Extreme and Discordant Physical Activity–Dietary Behavioral Profiles in University Students

  1. 1Department of Biological Principles of Physical Activity, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wrocław, Poland

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Physical activity (PA) and dietary behaviors are commonly examined separately or through average associations, potentially obscuring individual heterogeneity and behavioral discordance. This study aimed to identify extreme and recurring PA–dietary behavioral profiles and examine sex-related differences. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 418 university students (199 men and 219 women). Physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LF), whereas dietary behaviors were evaluated using the Questionnaire of Eating Behaviors (QEB) and expressed as the pro-Healthy Diet Index (pHDI-8) and non-Healthy Diet Index (nHDI-8). Robust Mahalanobis distance (RMD) was used to identify extreme multivariate configurations. Bayesian finite-mixture modelling was subsequently used to explore recurring behavioral profiles, and concordant and discordant PA–dietary configurations were examined by sex. Results: RMD identified 49 participants (11.7%) with extreme multivariate configurations; these configurations were significantly more frequent among men than women (15.1% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.042). Bayesian modelling yielded a converged, exploratory two-profile solution differentiated primarily by dietary behaviors. The more favorable dietary profile included 37.1% of participants and was more frequent among women (54.8% vs. 17.6%; OR = 5.68, 95% CI: 3.62–8.92). Discordant PA–dietary configurations occurred in 49.5% of the sample and were more frequent among women (57.1% vs. 41.2%; OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.29–2.80). Women predominantly exhibited lower PA and more favorable dietary behaviors, whereas men more frequently exhibited higher PA and less favorable dietary behaviors. Discordance was not associated with multivariate extremeness (p = 0.823). Conclusions: Joint assessment of PA and dietary behaviors revealed heterogeneity beyond average sex differences. Discordant PA–dietary configurations differed by sex, although their distribution was sensitive to reference cutoffs. Discordance and multivariate extremeness represented distinct aspects of behavioral heterogeneity. These findings support person-centered assessment of lifestyle behaviors and may inform more targeted health-promotion strategies.

Related

  1. Physical activity phenotypes from volume-based versus intensity-based wearable metrics: discordant classification and divergent metabolomic, body composition, and cardiac magnetic resonance associations
    Sarah Shi Sien Goh, Khung Keong Yeo, Khung Keong Yeo +9
    Frontiers in Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyDOAJ
  2. Age-related differences in behavioral and brain predictors of parkinsonism in autistic adults
    Manuela Velez Galindo, Goldie A. McQuaid, Rebecca A. Charlton +10
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Perceived physical literacy, sports team participation, and regular physical activity among university students: a national survey study
    Chuan-Chuan Huang, Zi-yi Cheng, Hung-Yi Wang +4
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.01 citedPhysiologyCrossref
  4. Estimated Free-Living Energy Balance and Perceived Physical and Psychological Stress in Japanese Male University Students: A 28-Day Observational Study
    A. Yoshida
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNutritionmedRxiv
  5. Predicting subsequent-year physical fitness assessment failure in university students using longitudinal data and explainable machine learning
    Lan Luo, Fawei Huang, Baixia Li
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0PhysiologyCrossref
BibTeX
@article{domaradzki2026beyond,
  title = {{Beyond Average Sex Differences: A Bayesian Analysis of Extreme and Discordant Physical Activity–Dietary Behavioral Profiles in University Students}},
  author = {Jarosław Domaradzki},
  journal = {Nutrients},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/nu18203379},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/20/3379},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Beyond Average Sex Differences: A Bayesian Analysis of Extreme and Discordant Physical Activity–Dietary Behavioral Profiles in University Students
AU  - Jarosław Domaradzki
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - Nutrients
DO  - 10.3390/nu18203379
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/20/3379
AB  - Background/Objectives: Physical activity (PA) and dietary behaviors are commonly examined separately or through average associations, potentially obscuring individual heterogeneity and behavioral discordance. This study aimed to identify extreme and recurring PA–dietary behavioral profiles and examine sex-related differences. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 418 university students (199 men and 219 women). Physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LF), whereas dietary behaviors were evaluated using the Questionnaire of Eating Behaviors (QEB) and expressed as the pro-Healthy Diet Index (pHDI-8) and non-Healthy Diet Index (nHDI-8). Robust Mahalanobis distance (RMD) was used to identify extreme multivariate configurations. Bayesian finite-mixture modelling was subsequently used to explore recurring behavioral profiles, and concordant and discordant PA–dietary configurations were examined by sex. Results: RMD identified 49 participants (11.7%) with extreme multivariate configurations; these configurations were significantly more frequent among men than women (15.1% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.042). Bayesian modelling yielded a converged, exploratory two-profile solution differentiated primarily by dietary behaviors. The more favorable dietary profile included 37.1% of participants and was more frequent among women (54.8% vs. 17.6%; OR = 5.68, 95% CI: 3.62–8.92). Discordant PA–dietary configurations occurred in 49.5% of the sample and were more frequent among women (57.1% vs. 41.2%; OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.29–2.80). Women predominantly exhibited lower PA and more favorable dietary behaviors, whereas men more frequently exhibited higher PA and less favorable dietary behaviors. Discordance was not associated with multivariate extremeness (p = 0.823). Conclusions: Joint assessment of PA and dietary behaviors revealed heterogeneity beyond average sex differences. Discordant PA–dietary configurations differed by sex, although their distribution was sensitive to reference cutoffs. Discordance and multivariate extremeness represented distinct aspects of behavioral heterogeneity. These findings support person-centered assessment of lifestyle behaviors and may inform more targeted health-promotion strategies.
SN  - 2072-6643
ER  -