Adaptation of a diabetes self-management training program for a community setting: evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and program fit
- 1Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California
- 2Office of the Senior Vice President of Health Affairs, University of Southern California
- 3Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Abstract
Introduction: Community-based diabetes self-management education and support can improve access to self-management resources, but less is known about how established programs can be systematically adapted for community settings before broader implementation. This pilot evaluated a community-centered adaptation of an evidence based, clinical program and assessed whether it achieved sufficient feasibility, acceptability, and program fit to support continued implementation.
Materials and methods: Over the course of 16 months, this bilingual, community-based program consisted of 5 weekly sessions delivered by Community Health Workers/Promotores de Salud to 161 adults with or at risk for type 2 diabetes across nine cohorts and three iterative implementation phases. Adaptations focused on curriculum and materials, content delivery and session logistics, cultural and linguistic relevance, and the evaluation and feedback process. Participant surveys, facilitator feedback, and observer rubrics were reviewed between phases to guide refinements. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed using participation, retention, fidelity, logistical, satisfaction, and qualitative indicators. Knowledge and self-efficacy were examined as supportive indicators of program fit using descriptive analyses and linear mixed-effects models; qualitative feedback was analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis.
Results: Enrollment approached 90%, attrition remained low, and 1-month follow-up completion increased from 84% in Phase 1 to 98% in Phase 3. Facilitator and observer feedback indicated fewer implementation barriers, improved session flow and fidelity, and greater delivery stability in later phases. Satisfaction remained high across phases (3.83, 3.87, and 3.89 on a four-point scale). Knowledge increased significantly in Phase 1 at post-training and follow-up, while Phases 2 and 3 demonstrated additional post-training gains of 16.9 and 28.7 percentage points, respectively, compared with Phase 1. Self-efficacy increased significantly in Phase 1, and Phase 3 demonstrated an additional 1.705-point gain compared with Phase 1. Participants described the training as understandable, culturally relevant, practical, and supportive.
Discussion: A structured process of implementation, reflection, and refinement supported the adaptation of this program into a bilingual, CHW/P-led community program. At the end of phase 3, evidence supported sufficient feasibility, acceptability, and program fit for continued implementation and future evaluation of longer-term behavioral and clinical outcomes.
Related
- Stakeholder Perspectives on the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Implementation Strategies for Adapted Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening Tools in Community Settings in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
- Acceptability, feasibility, quality of life and diabetes distress score outcomes: A pragmatic randomised clinical trial on continuous glucose monitoring for people with type 1 diabetes
- Feasibility and Acceptability of Delivering HIV Self-Testing and Oral PrEP Refills to Female Sex Workers Through Community Drug Shops in Kampala, Uganda: A Single-Arm Pilot Interventional Study.
- The "Diabetes in Primary Care - Improving Classification" (DePICtion) study: a feasibility study to determine the utility and acceptability of implementing diabetes classification tools in primary care
- Usability, acceptability and feasibility of continuous glucose monitoring among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Kenya
BibTeX
@article{dogolden2026adaptation,
title = {{Adaptation of a diabetes self-management training program for a community setting: evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and program fit}},
author = {Brian Do-Golden and Claire Woodrow and James Settles and Mayra Rubio-Diaz and Adriana Argaiz and Michele D. Kipke and Nicole Wolfe},
journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1968391},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1968391/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Adaptation of a diabetes self-management training program for a community setting: evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and program fit
AU - Brian Do-Golden
AU - Claire Woodrow
AU - James Settles
AU - Mayra Rubio-Diaz
AU - Adriana Argaiz
AU - Michele D. Kipke
AU - Nicole Wolfe
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1968391
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1968391/full
AB - Introduction: Community-based diabetes self-management education and support can improve access to self-management resources, but less is known about how established programs can be systematically adapted for community settings before broader implementation. This pilot evaluated a community-centered adaptation of an evidence based, clinical program and assessed whether it achieved sufficient feasibility, acceptability, and program fit to support continued implementation. Materials and methods: Over the course of 16 months, this bilingual, community-based program consisted of 5 weekly sessions delivered by Community Health Workers/Promotores de Salud to 161 adults with or at risk for type 2 diabetes across nine cohorts and three iterative implementation phases. Adaptations focused on curriculum and materials, content delivery and session logistics, cultural and linguistic relevance, and the evaluation and feedback process. Participant surveys, facilitator feedback, and observer rubrics were reviewed between phases to guide refinements. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed using participation, retention, fidelity, logistical, satisfaction, and qualitative indicators. Knowledge and self-efficacy were examined as supportive indicators of program fit using descriptive analyses and linear mixed-effects models; qualitative feedback was analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Results: Enrollment approached 90%, attrition remained low, and 1-month follow-up completion increased from 84% in Phase 1 to 98% in Phase 3. Facilitator and observer feedback indicated fewer implementation barriers, improved session flow and fidelity, and greater delivery stability in later phases. Satisfaction remained high across phases (3.83, 3.87, and 3.89 on a four-point scale). Knowledge increased significantly in Phase 1 at post-training and follow-up, while Phases 2 and 3 demonstrated additional post-training gains of 16.9 and 28.7 percentage points, respectively, compared with Phase 1. Self-efficacy increased significantly in Phase 1, and Phase 3 demonstrated an additional 1.705-point gain compared with Phase 1. Participants described the training as understandable, culturally relevant, practical, and supportive. Discussion: A structured process of implementation, reflection, and refinement supported the adaptation of this program into a bilingual, CHW/P-led community program. At the end of phase 3, evidence supported sufficient feasibility, acceptability, and program fit for continued implementation and future evaluation of longer-term behavioral and clinical outcomes.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -