Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cancers

Incremental Prognostic Information Beyond Nodal Positivity: The AJCC 8th Edition N1/N2 Subdivision and the Lymph Node Ratio in Resected Periampullary Adenocarcinoma

  1. 1Department of Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 327 Sosa-ro, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon 14647, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition subdivides node-positive periampullary adenocarcinoma into N1 and N2 by the number of positive nodes. We quantified how much this subdivision and the lymph node ratio (LNR) each add to nodal positivity, and how the nodal yield affects the comparison. Methods: This retrospective cohort comprised 147 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies for pancreatic head (n = 49), distal bile duct (n = 63), ampullary (n = 31) or duodenal (n = 4) adenocarcinoma. In covariate-adjusted Cox models stratified by origin, the N1/N2 subdivision and the LNR were tested over nodal positivity and over each other with nested likelihood-ratio tests, overall, with the examined-node count in the model and by the period of resection. Results: The median nodal yield was 17 (10 in 2013–2016, 19 in 2017–2024). Beyond nodal positivity, the N1/N2 subdivision added χ2 0.25 (p = 0.61; adjusted N2-versus-N1 hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–2.45) and the LNR added χ2 9.60 (p = 0.002; hazard ratio 1.41 per 0.1, 95% CI 1.22–1.62). The LNR added to the N category (p = 0.002; optimism-corrected C-index gain 0.020, 95% CI 0.002–0.041), whereas the N category did not add detectably to the LNR (p = 0.54). With the examined-node count in the model, the LNR increment was attenuated (p = 0.045) and the subdivision’s increment rose (χ2 3.65, p = 0.056). From 2017 onward (n = 113), the LNR and the positive-node count were nearly collinear among the node-positive patients (ρ 0.90 versus −0.02 before 2017), and neither the subdivision (p = 0.49) nor the LNR (p = 0.17) added significantly to positivity. Conclusions: The N1/N2 subdivision added little beyond nodal positivity, although imprecisely estimated, and its increment rose when the examined-node count was in the model. The LNR added prognostic information mainly when the yield was low or variable; where the yield was higher and more uniform, the ratio and the count-based category conveyed nearly the same information, and no additional value of the ratio was demonstrated.

Related

  1. Early hematoma expansion provides incremental prognostic information beyond admission characteristics for 6-month functional outcome after adult traumatic brain injury
    Yinghao Yang, Changtao Liu, Rongjie Wu +3
    Frontiers in neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  2. Prognostic discrimination of SOFA-2 vs. SOFA-1 and incremental information from cardiovascular scoring and vasoactive support intensity in patients with sepsis receiving early vasoactive therapy
    Tianci Huang, Mingyuan Pan, Lifan Pan +3
    Frontiers in cardiovascular medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Incremental Value of Radiation Dose for Prognostic Stratification Beyond Performance Status in Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases
    Advances in radiation oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Incremental Prognostic Value of Fetal Doppler Beyond Biometry for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Deniz Taşdemir, Murat Haksever, Selim Kandemir +6
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Incremental prognostic value of hepatic tissue alterations derived from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a case-control study
    Xiahui Tian, Yuelong Yang, Guanyu Lu +8
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{na2026incremental,
  title = {{Incremental Prognostic Information Beyond Nodal Positivity: The AJCC 8th Edition N1/N2 Subdivision and the Lymph Node Ratio in Resected Periampullary Adenocarcinoma}},
  author = {Gun Hyung Na and Changho Seo},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18203321},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3321},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Incremental Prognostic Information Beyond Nodal Positivity: The AJCC 8th Edition N1/N2 Subdivision and the Lymph Node Ratio in Resected Periampullary Adenocarcinoma
AU  - Gun Hyung Na
AU  - Changho Seo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18203321
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3321
AB  - Background/Objectives: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition subdivides node-positive periampullary adenocarcinoma into N1 and N2 by the number of positive nodes. We quantified how much this subdivision and the lymph node ratio (LNR) each add to nodal positivity, and how the nodal yield affects the comparison. Methods: This retrospective cohort comprised 147 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies for pancreatic head (n = 49), distal bile duct (n = 63), ampullary (n = 31) or duodenal (n = 4) adenocarcinoma. In covariate-adjusted Cox models stratified by origin, the N1/N2 subdivision and the LNR were tested over nodal positivity and over each other with nested likelihood-ratio tests, overall, with the examined-node count in the model and by the period of resection. Results: The median nodal yield was 17 (10 in 2013–2016, 19 in 2017–2024). Beyond nodal positivity, the N1/N2 subdivision added χ2 0.25 (p = 0.61; adjusted N2-versus-N1 hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–2.45) and the LNR added χ2 9.60 (p = 0.002; hazard ratio 1.41 per 0.1, 95% CI 1.22–1.62). The LNR added to the N category (p = 0.002; optimism-corrected C-index gain 0.020, 95% CI 0.002–0.041), whereas the N category did not add detectably to the LNR (p = 0.54). With the examined-node count in the model, the LNR increment was attenuated (p = 0.045) and the subdivision’s increment rose (χ2 3.65, p = 0.056). From 2017 onward (n = 113), the LNR and the positive-node count were nearly collinear among the node-positive patients (ρ 0.90 versus −0.02 before 2017), and neither the subdivision (p = 0.49) nor the LNR (p = 0.17) added significantly to positivity. Conclusions: The N1/N2 subdivision added little beyond nodal positivity, although imprecisely estimated, and its increment rose when the examined-node count was in the model. The LNR added prognostic information mainly when the yield was low or variable; where the yield was higher and more uniform, the ratio and the count-based category conveyed nearly the same information, and no additional value of the ratio was demonstrated.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -