Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A formal correspondence between Bayesian inference problems and the Heisenberg representation

Abstract

The proposed formulation establishes a formal correspondence between the Heisenberg representation and the Bayesian formulation of inverse problems. The likelihood function is first expressed in Hilbert space through a quadratic norm of the difference between the noisy observations and the response of a forward model depending on the unknown parameters, weighted by the inverse of the observational noise covariance. Based on the common mathematical structure of this quadratic form and the observable operator in the Heisenberg representation, the inverse observational noise covariance operator is identified with the initial observable. To establish this correspondence, a stochastic field with Matérn covariance is considered and represented through the Karhunen-Loève expansion. The eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of this expansion are then used to define the state |Ψ⟩ within the proposed formalism. The main results are summarized by four theorems: the unitarity of the evolution operator, the self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian, the conservation of the trace of the observable, and the formal correspondence between the Bayesian likelihood and the Heisenberg observable structure. Limiting cases of the Matérn covariance are analyzed. Finally, numerical examples illustrate the analytical results.

Related

  1. Fast Bayesian Inference for Long-Duration Gravitational-Wave Signals in 3G detectors
    Anand S. Sengupta
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  2. Thermodynamic Cyclic Processes with Markov Samplers in Bayesian Inference
    Heinrich von Campe, Bjoern Malte Schaefer
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  3. Bayesian bilevel operator learning with low-rank adaptation for efficient uncertainty quantification of PDE inverse problems.
    Ray Zirui Zhang, Christopher E Miles, Xiaohui Xie +1
    Nature communicationsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textStatistical & nonlinear physicsEurope PMC
  4. Quantitative mobile gamma-ray spectrometry through Bayesian inference
    David Breitenmoser, Alberto Stabilini, Malgorzata Magdalena Kasprzak +1
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationCrossrefPMC
  5. Joint Bayesian Inference for Extraction of Charmonium Long Distance Matrix Elements Using PYTHIA
    Yubo Liu, Rongrong Ma
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chacoff2026formal,
  title = {{A formal correspondence between Bayesian inference problems and the Heisenberg representation}},
  author = {C. Abugattas Chacoff},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.16941},
  eprint = {2608.16941},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16941},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A formal correspondence between Bayesian inference problems and the Heisenberg representation
AU  - C. Abugattas Chacoff
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.16941
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16941
AB  - The proposed formulation establishes a formal correspondence between the Heisenberg representation and the Bayesian formulation of inverse problems. The likelihood function is first expressed in Hilbert space through a quadratic norm of the difference between the noisy observations and the response of a forward model depending on the unknown parameters, weighted by the inverse of the observational noise covariance. Based on the common mathematical structure of this quadratic form and the observable operator in the Heisenberg representation, the inverse observational noise covariance operator is identified with the initial observable. To establish this correspondence, a stochastic field with Matérn covariance is considered and represented through the Karhunen-Loève expansion. The eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of this expansion are then used to define the state |Ψ⟩ within the proposed formalism. The main results are summarized by four theorems: the unitarity of the evolution operator, the self-adjointness of the Hamiltonian, the conservation of the trace of the observable, and the formal correspondence between the Bayesian likelihood and the Heisenberg observable structure. Limiting cases of the Matérn covariance are analyzed. Finally, numerical examples illustrate the analytical results.
ER  -