Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Kriging and Gaussian processes: interconnected frameworks for spatial modelling and prediction

Abstract

Spatial modelling and inference arise across many areas of science and engineering, with Kriging and Gaussian process (GP) regression serving as two widely used predictive models. Although grounded in the same random field theory, these approaches are often treated in isolation. As a result, their connection has been obscured by differences in terminology, notation, and practical implementation. This separation largely reflects their independent development within geostatistics and machine learning, respectively. To bridge this methodological divide, this work establishes a unified mathematical framework that connects the two paradigms. The underlying assumptions and formulations of each approach are detailed and compared within this framework. This comparison highlights their differences while clarifying the connections between them. The resulting perspective provides practitioners with a common foundation for translating concepts and methods between geostatistics and machine learning. In particular, it makes methodological developments in either field more accessible to the other, including advances in uncertainty quantification from the GP literature.

Related

  1. New Modelling and Solution Frameworks for Multiple Objectives, Decomposability and Impulsivity in Continuous-time Markov Decision Processes
    Luke Fairley, Rob Shone, Peter Jacko +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Bayesian Emulation of Multi-fidelity Earth System Modelling Using Hierarchical Gaussian Processes
    Xiaoyu Xiong, Louise Kimpton, Huiyi Yang +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Processes for Translational Modelling of Clinical Outcomes
    Isaac S. Hayden, Alicia D'Souza, Steven Niederer +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Equation free data-driven modelling of chaotic processes
    Aurora Poggi, Marco Martens, Hjalmar Brismar +2
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textDynamical systemsarXiv
  5. Quasihelix properties of selected Volterra Gaussian processes
    Yuliya Mishura, Kostiantyn Ralchenko
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{mohammadi2026kriging,
  title = {{Kriging and Gaussian processes: interconnected frameworks for spatial modelling and prediction}},
  author = {Hossein Mohammadi},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.10783},
  eprint = {2610.10783},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10783},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Kriging and Gaussian processes: interconnected frameworks for spatial modelling and prediction
AU  - Hossein Mohammadi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.10783
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10783
AB  - Spatial modelling and inference arise across many areas of science and engineering, with Kriging and Gaussian process (GP) regression serving as two widely used predictive models. Although grounded in the same random field theory, these approaches are often treated in isolation. As a result, their connection has been obscured by differences in terminology, notation, and practical implementation. This separation largely reflects their independent development within geostatistics and machine learning, respectively. To bridge this methodological divide, this work establishes a unified mathematical framework that connects the two paradigms. The underlying assumptions and formulations of each approach are detailed and compared within this framework. This comparison highlights their differences while clarifying the connections between them. The resulting perspective provides practitioners with a common foundation for translating concepts and methods between geostatistics and machine learning. In particular, it makes methodological developments in either field more accessible to the other, including advances in uncertainty quantification from the GP literature.
ER  -