Affective polarization of space under imminent physical threat: Self-reported affect, physiology, and social responding across two experiments
- 1Department of Psychology, Social and Organizational Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- 2Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
Abstract
When humans navigate through their social and spatial surroundings, they construct affective representations of the spatial context that shape this navigation. The theory of affective judgment in spatial context specifies how people build these representations. We present two laboratory experiments (N = 121 and N = 254) that lend more ecological validity to this line of inquiry. In a modified threat-of-shock paradigm, participants experienced an actual physical threat at one location of an environment depicted on a computer screen. Like in previous online experiments, we observed that, compared to a control condition, participants reported that the threat at this location (termed hotspot, an affectively salient location in space) colored the surroundings negatively with high subjectively perceived arousal at close distance whereas it colored the surroundings positively with low subjectively perceived arousal farther away (i.e., an affective polarization of space). However, this polarization was not mirrored by physiological indices of affect, even though electrodermal and cardiac activity lent support to the idea that participants actually were more threatened closer to the hotspot. Furthermore, we could not find evidence for affective polarization elicited by the threat affecting the affective empathy in response to strangers shown at the different locations. Thus, whereas the subjective experience of affective polarization of space seems robust across different operationalizations, we did not find evidence that this subjective experience is reflected in underlying physiology or that affective empathy is moderated by distance to a threatening location.
Related
- Unusual paraneoplastic thrombocytosis in small bowel neuroendocrine tumor responding to 177Lu-DOTATATE
- Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models in Responding to Common Misconceptions Regarding Periodontal Disease and Oral Hygiene
- Web-based resources supporting a public health approach to preventing and responding to problematic and harmful sexual behaviour in children and young people: protocol for a grey literature scoping review.
- A Case of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Responding to Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab after Lenvatinib Treatment
- A Case of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor-Producing Lung Adenocarcinoma with KRAS G12V Mutation Responding to Pembrolizumab
BibTeX
@article{kastendieck2026affective,
title = {{Affective polarization of space under imminent physical threat: Self-reported affect, physiology, and social responding across two experiments}},
author = {Till Kastendieck and Ursula Hess and Christophe Blaison},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0356294},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356294},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Affective polarization of space under imminent physical threat: Self-reported affect, physiology, and social responding across two experiments
AU - Till Kastendieck
AU - Ursula Hess
AU - Christophe Blaison
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/21
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0356294
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356294
AB - When humans navigate through their social and spatial surroundings, they construct affective representations of the spatial context that shape this navigation. The theory of affective judgment in spatial context specifies how people build these representations. We present two laboratory experiments (N = 121 and N = 254) that lend more ecological validity to this line of inquiry. In a modified threat-of-shock paradigm, participants experienced an actual physical threat at one location of an environment depicted on a computer screen. Like in previous online experiments, we observed that, compared to a control condition, participants reported that the threat at this location (termed hotspot, an affectively salient location in space) colored the surroundings negatively with high subjectively perceived arousal at close distance whereas it colored the surroundings positively with low subjectively perceived arousal farther away (i.e., an affective polarization of space). However, this polarization was not mirrored by physiological indices of affect, even though electrodermal and cardiac activity lent support to the idea that participants actually were more threatened closer to the hotspot. Furthermore, we could not find evidence for affective polarization elicited by the threat affecting the affective empathy in response to strangers shown at the different locations. Thus, whereas the subjective experience of affective polarization of space seems robust across different operationalizations, we did not find evidence that this subjective experience is reflected in underlying physiology or that affective empathy is moderated by distance to a threatening location.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -