Environmental water management and H5 bird flu in waterbirds: Context and scenarios for decision-making
Abstract
The impact of animal viruses has dramatically increased over the last decade globally, exemplified by the disruption caused by the recent panzootic of high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b (H5 bird flu), which has caused the deaths of millions of wild birds and mammals, as well as domestic animals such as poultry. Wild waterbirds play a role in the spread of H5 bird flu and suffer mass mortality from this virus. They are central to virus risk, given they undertake long-distance movements and often aggregate densely to breed, forage and roost. In many regulated river systems, wetlands and waterbirds can be influenced by managed ‘environmental water’, which is used to maintain habitats and support ecological processes such as waterbird breeding. However, the same water management levers that aim to support ecological processes may also influence host and environmental factors that can affect virus transmission and spread. Here, we explore potential virus incursion and outbreak scenarios relevant to decision-making about environmental water, including differences in outbreak location, timing, spread pathways and severity. We describe potential management levers and decisions, ranging from maintaining or increasing planned watering to altering, reducing or ceasing watering where disease risks outweigh ecological benefits. Overall, decision-making must balance ecological objectives, disease mitigation, operational feasibility and risks to threatened species and ecosystems. Improved understanding of relationships between water management, waterbird movements and disease dynamics will be essential to support predictive modelling and guide environmental water management under emerging virus threats.
Related
- Operationalising the context in regenerative agriculture: decision-making and farm variability
- Achieving social and environmental justice: a call to integrate the human and the more-than-human in spatial decision making
- Environmental volatility amplifies Pavlovian control in decision-making
- BGC Atlas v2: biosynthetic gene clusters with taxonomic and environmental context at scale
- Aligning evidence and action: The Research-to-Decision (RED) Framework to address modern environmental and ecological challenges
BibTeX
@misc{mcginness2026environmental,
title = {{Environmental water management and H5 bird flu in waterbirds: Context and scenarios for decision-making}},
author = {Heather Maree McGinness and Micha V Jackson and Darran King and Linda V Merrin and Jin Teng and Rebecca Doble and David Post and Paul Eden and Andrew Breed and Michelle Wille},
howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1007/s11273-026-10193-1},
url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/14984/},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Environmental water management and H5 bird flu in waterbirds: Context and scenarios for decision-making
AU - Heather Maree McGinness
AU - Micha V Jackson
AU - Darran King
AU - Linda V Merrin
AU - Jin Teng
AU - Rebecca Doble
AU - David Post
AU - Paul Eden
AU - Andrew Breed
AU - Michelle Wille
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/14
PB - EcoEvoRxiv
DO - 10.1007/s11273-026-10193-1
UR - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/14984/
AB - The impact of animal viruses has dramatically increased over the last decade globally, exemplified by the disruption caused by the recent panzootic of high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b (H5 bird flu), which has caused the deaths of millions of wild birds and mammals, as well as domestic animals such as poultry. Wild waterbirds play a role in the spread of H5 bird flu and suffer mass mortality from this virus. They are central to virus risk, given they undertake long-distance movements and often aggregate densely to breed, forage and roost. In many regulated river systems, wetlands and waterbirds can be influenced by managed ‘environmental water’, which is used to maintain habitats and support ecological processes such as waterbird breeding. However, the same water management levers that aim to support ecological processes may also influence host and environmental factors that can affect virus transmission and spread. Here, we explore potential virus incursion and outbreak scenarios relevant to decision-making about environmental water, including differences in outbreak location, timing, spread pathways and severity. We describe potential management levers and decisions, ranging from maintaining or increasing planned watering to altering, reducing or ceasing watering where disease risks outweigh ecological benefits. Overall, decision-making must balance ecological objectives, disease mitigation, operational feasibility and risks to threatened species and ecosystems. Improved understanding of relationships between water management, waterbird movements and disease dynamics will be essential to support predictive modelling and guide environmental water management under emerging virus threats.
ER -