Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Binder chemistry sets the interfacial balance constant in CsPbBr3 nanocrystal supercapacitor electrodes

Abstract

Previous work on lead-free tin halide perovskites showed that the binder instead sets the electrolyte concentration at which capacitance is maximised, following the relationship 100 × [Li+]opt + PVDFwt% = ξInt with ξInt = 25 ± 2.5, established by varying the loading of a single polymer. Whether ξInt is universal or specific to that polymer has not been tested. Here, four binders spanning fluorinated (PVDF), carboxylic (PAA), cellulosic (CMC) and sulfonic (PEDOT:PSS) chemistry are compared on CsPbBr3 nanocrystal electrodes at four LiTFSI concentrations in acetonitrile, with binder loading fixed at 15 wt% and all other formulation variables held constant. The relationship applies to CsPbBr3: PVDF at 15 wt% gives an optimum at 0.10--0.15 M and 112 F g−1, against 126 F g−1 reported for CsSnCl3 under the same conditions, extending the result to a different B-site cation, halide and crystal system. PVDF and CMC optimise at 0.10 M, giving ξInt = 25, while PAA and PEDOT:PSS optimise at 0.15 M, giving ξInt = 30, with maximum values of 188 F g−1 for PAA and 146 mF cm−2 for PEDOT:PSS. The two binders showing the shift carry ionisable acid groups at high density, indicating that ξInt expressed in weight percent requires a binder-specific value. In all four electrodes, CsPbBr3 converts to PbBr2 and CsBr during electrochemical characterisation, and the surface lead content of the PEDOT:PSS electrode decreases.

Related

  1. Sodium Incorporation in CsPbBr3−xIx Nanocrystal Electrodes: Lattice Contraction and the Suppression of Field-Driven Iodine Expulsion
    Arun Kumar, Monojit Bag
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Defect chemistry engineering of cobalt-free La–Sr–Fe–Ni–O perovskites for high-performance solid oxide cell air electrodes
    Siavash Alizadeh, Allan Araújo, Maryam Bazgir +9
    Materials AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BYMaterials & polymersGeneral physicsHAL
  3. Phase-field simulation of interfacial stability in structured gas-liquid contactors: design rules for gas diffusion electrodes
    Alexander J. Wagner, Hari Murali Krishna Varma Gottumukkala, Henning Bonart
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textApplied physics & instrumentationComputational physicsarXiv
  4. Culinary Chemistry as a Platform for Interfacial Materials Design
    Josep Moreno, I. Brian Becerril‐Castro, Irene Calderon‐Gonzalez +10
    Advanced Materials InterfacesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral physicsDOAJ
  5. Electroactive fiber optics for real-time, multiscale probing of ion transport and interfacial chemistry
    Tatjana Šafarik, Frédéric Kanoufi, Médéric Loyez +7
    Light: Science & ApplicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOptics & photonicsCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{kumar2026binder,
  title = {{Binder chemistry sets the interfacial balance constant in CsPbBr$_3$ nanocrystal supercapacitor electrodes}},
  author = {Arun Kumar and Monojit Bag},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.14588},
  eprint = {2609.14588},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14588},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Binder chemistry sets the interfacial balance constant in CsPbBr_3 nanocrystal supercapacitor electrodes
AU  - Arun Kumar
AU  - Monojit Bag
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/13
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.14588
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14588
AB  - Previous work on lead-free tin halide perovskites showed that the binder instead sets the electrolyte concentration at which capacitance is maximised, following the relationship 100 × [Li^+]_opt + PVDF_wt% = ξ_Int with ξ_Int = 25 ± 2.5, established by varying the loading of a single polymer. Whether ξ_Int is universal or specific to that polymer has not been tested. Here, four binders spanning fluorinated (PVDF), carboxylic (PAA), cellulosic (CMC) and sulfonic (PEDOT:PSS) chemistry are compared on CsPbBr_3 nanocrystal electrodes at four LiTFSI concentrations in acetonitrile, with binder loading fixed at 15 wt% and all other formulation variables held constant. The relationship applies to CsPbBr_3: PVDF at 15 wt% gives an optimum at 0.10--0.15 M and 112 F g^−1, against 126 F g^−1 reported for CsSnCl_3 under the same conditions, extending the result to a different B-site cation, halide and crystal system. PVDF and CMC optimise at 0.10 M, giving ξ_Int = 25, while PAA and PEDOT:PSS optimise at 0.15 M, giving ξ_Int = 30, with maximum values of 188 F g^−1 for PAA and 146 mF cm^−2 for PEDOT:PSS. The two binders showing the shift carry ionisable acid groups at high density, indicating that ξ_Int expressed in weight percent requires a binder-specific value. In all four electrodes, CsPbBr_3 converts to PbBr_2 and CsBr during electrochemical characterisation, and the surface lead content of the PEDOT:PSS electrode decreases.
ER  -