Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Crohn's & Colitis 360

International practice patterns in the management of pouchitis: results from a global survey

Abstract

Background: Pouchitis is the most frequent long-term complication after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis. This study aimed to describe current international practices, definitions, and treatment strategies among experienced clinicians.

Methods: An international web-based survey was conducted in 2025, following CROSS guidelines, exploring diagnostic, monitoring, and therapeutic practices. Responses were anonymized and analyzed descriptively.

Results: A total of 412 physicians from 49 countries completed the survey, mostly gastroenterologists involved in IBD care (362/412, 87.8%). Most clinicians (156/412, 37.9%) estimated a pouchitis prevalence of 26%-50% among patients with IPAA, typically occurring within the first postoperative year. Follow-up was scheduled every 3-6 months by 164/412 (39.8%) physicians, with nearly half (47.6%) reporting the use of the pouch disease activity index (PDAI). Fecal calprotectin was the preferred non-invasive monitoring tool (326/412, 79.1%), whereas intestinal ultrasound was selected by 130/412 respondents (31.69%). Endoscopy was the primary diagnostic and follow-up modality (398/412, 96.6%), with biopsies routinely taken (364/412, 88%), although 46.7% of respondents reported not using a standardized histological scoring system. Prophylactic therapy was prescribed by 222/412 (53.9%), mainly probiotics (27.7%) and rectal mesalazine (18.2%). In acute pouchitis, ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole was the preferred first-line regimen (218/412, 52.9%). For chronic antibiotic-dependent or refractory pouchitis, advanced therapies were the predominant first-line option (254/412, 61.7%), with vedolizumab (198/412, 48.1%), and infliximab (170/412, 41.3%) most frequently selected. Ustekinumab, selective IL-23 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors and S1P receptor modulators were increasingly used in refractory cases. Treatment targets were primarily clinical (156/412, 37.9%) and endoscopic (124/412, 30.1%) remission, and most respondents (246/396, 62.1%) reported performing endoscopic assessment within 3-6 months after advanced treatment initiation.

Conclusions: This international survey demonstrates substantial heterogeneity in pouchitis diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment, highlighting important gaps in standardized disease assessment and treatment strategies. The findings support the need for consensus-based approaches and prospective, pouch-specific studies to improve the standardization of pouchitis care.

Related

  1. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Third edition
    George D. Gann, Tein McDonald, Bethanie Walder +22
    Restoration EcologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC24 citedEcologyOpenAlex
  2. A Case of Refractory Pouchitis with Postoperative Anal Stenosis after Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Treated with Vedolizumab, a Radial Incision and Cutting
    Anna Ishida, Yuichi Shimodate, Junya Sakaue +5
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGenetics & genomicsJ-STAGE
  3. Updated Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.
    Laura Turton, Barbra H B Timmer, Neil S Hockley +14
    Seminars in hearingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  4. Risk-Based Food Safety Management in a Changing Food System: International Approaches and Implications for Vietnam
    Nguyen Thi Thu Hien
    European Journal of Management, Economics and BusinessPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyNutritionHAL
  5. Simplification of the pouchitis scoring system and analysis of antibiotic treatment outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: based on the modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index
    Wang Zhicheng, Ge Xiaolong, Liu Wei +1
    结直肠肛门外科Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGenetics & genomicsDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{fanizzi2026international,
  title = {{International practice patterns in the management of pouchitis: results from a global survey}},
  author = {Fabrizio Fanizzi and Ferdinando D’Amico and Maria Galbiati and Vipul Jairath and Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet and Silvio Danese},
  journal = {Crohn's \& Colitis 360},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/crocol/otag114},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otag114},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - International practice patterns in the management of pouchitis: results from a global survey
AU  - Fabrizio Fanizzi
AU  - Ferdinando D’Amico
AU  - Maria Galbiati
AU  - Vipul Jairath
AU  - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
AU  - Silvio Danese
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Crohn's & Colitis 360
DO  - 10.1093/crocol/otag114
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otag114
AB  - Background: Pouchitis is the most frequent long-term complication after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis. This study aimed to describe current international practices, definitions, and treatment strategies among experienced clinicians.  Methods: An international web-based survey was conducted in 2025, following CROSS guidelines, exploring diagnostic, monitoring, and therapeutic practices. Responses were anonymized and analyzed descriptively.  Results: A total of 412 physicians from 49 countries completed the survey, mostly gastroenterologists involved in IBD care (362/412, 87.8%). Most clinicians (156/412, 37.9%) estimated a pouchitis prevalence of 26%-50% among patients with IPAA, typically occurring within the first postoperative year. Follow-up was scheduled every 3-6 months by 164/412 (39.8%) physicians, with nearly half (47.6%) reporting the use of the pouch disease activity index (PDAI). Fecal calprotectin was the preferred non-invasive monitoring tool (326/412, 79.1%), whereas intestinal ultrasound was selected by 130/412 respondents (31.69%). Endoscopy was the primary diagnostic and follow-up modality (398/412, 96.6%), with biopsies routinely taken (364/412, 88%), although 46.7% of respondents reported not using a standardized histological scoring system. Prophylactic therapy was prescribed by 222/412 (53.9%), mainly probiotics (27.7%) and rectal mesalazine (18.2%). In acute pouchitis, ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole was the preferred first-line regimen (218/412, 52.9%). For chronic antibiotic-dependent or refractory pouchitis, advanced therapies were the predominant first-line option (254/412, 61.7%), with vedolizumab (198/412, 48.1%), and infliximab (170/412, 41.3%) most frequently selected. Ustekinumab, selective IL-23 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors and S1P receptor modulators were increasingly used in refractory cases. Treatment targets were primarily clinical (156/412, 37.9%) and endoscopic (124/412, 30.1%) remission, and most respondents (246/396, 62.1%) reported performing endoscopic assessment within 3-6 months after advanced treatment initiation.  Conclusions: This international survey demonstrates substantial heterogeneity in pouchitis diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment, highlighting important gaps in standardized disease assessment and treatment strategies. The findings support the need for consensus-based approaches and prospective, pouch-specific studies to improve the standardization of pouchitis care.
SN  - 2631-827X
ER  -