Highly pathogenic avian influenza in Canada: Spatial analysis of ecological hot and cold spots and environmental drivers.
9 affiliations
- 1Artificial Intelligence & Mathematical Modeling Lab (AIMMLab), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Room 500, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.
- 2Global South Artificial Intelligence for Pandemic and Epidemic Preparedness and Response Network (AI4PEP), Toronto, ON, Canada.
- 3Africa-Canada Artificial Intelligence and Data Innovation Consortium (ACADIC), Toronto, ON, Canada.
- 4Department of Mathematics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
- 5Department of Food and Drugs, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.
- 6Canada Animal Health Surveillance System (CAHSS), Animal Health Canada, Elora, ON N0B 1S0, Canada.
- 7Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- 8Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Bahen Centre for Information Technology, Room 6291, 40 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 2E4, Canada.
- 9Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
The number and magnitude of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) outbreaks have increased globally in recent years, placing substantial burdens on public health and causing significant economic losses to the poultry industry. Identifying spatial hotspots and key environmental drivers of HPAI is essential for improving surveillance efficiency and enabling targeted prevention strategies. This study aimed to identify spatial hotspots and cold spots of HPAI in Canada and determine the most influential predictors of HPAI occurrence at both national and local levels. Subdivision-level data were compiled from multiple sources, including reported HPAI cases in wild birds, waterfowl population density, poultry premises, weather and air quality indicators, vegetation cover, elevation, gross primary production, water bodies, and wildfire occurrence. Spatial cluster analyses using Getis-Ord Gi* and Anselin Moran's I were conducted to detect hotspots and cold spots and generate risk maps. Generalized Additive Models (GAM), XGBoost, and Random Forest Regression (RFR) were compared using R-squared score, root mean square error, and mean absolute error, and Shapley Additive exPlanations were applied to the machine learning models to quantify predictor importance. Consistent HPAI hotspots were identified in southwestern British Columbia, central and southern Alberta, southern Ontario, and the Atlantic provinces, while cold spots were observed in several central and northern regions. Hotspots of HPAI in domestic birds coincided with hotspots in wild birds, indicating that poultry and bird farms located in these areas are at higher risk of infection. GAM achieved the highest cross-validation accuracy, with XGBoost slightly outperforming RFR. Across all models, waterfowl population density, poultry premises, vegetation metrics including gross primary production, and air quality emerged as the most influential predictors. These findings provide actionable insights to support risk-based HPAI surveillance, targeted biosecurity interventions, and improved resource allocation in Canada.
Related
- Environmental Drivers and Spatial Patterns of Lassa Fever Cases in Nigeria: A GIS-Based Approach to Dynamic Susceptibility Mapping
- Inactivation of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) using a combination of Hatano-RCMF and naturally strongly acidic hot spring water
- A caprine mammary infection model for highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1
- Evidence of Exposure to Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5 Viruses in East Greenland Polar Bears
- Intranasal and intramuscular H5-Matrix-M nanoparticle vaccines protects against highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus in mice
BibTeX
@article{nia2026highly,
title = {{Highly pathogenic avian influenza in Canada: Spatial analysis of ecological hot and cold spots and environmental drivers.}},
author = {Zahra Movahedi Nia and Nicola Luigi Bragazzi and Murray Gillies and Emma Gardner and Jude Dzevela Kong},
journal = {One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.onehlt.2026.101630},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42997465},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Highly pathogenic avian influenza in Canada: Spatial analysis of ecological hot and cold spots and environmental drivers.
AU - Zahra Movahedi Nia
AU - Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
AU - Murray Gillies
AU - Emma Gardner
AU - Jude Dzevela Kong
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
JO - One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
DO - 10.1016/j.onehlt.2026.101630
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42997465
AB - The number and magnitude of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) outbreaks have increased globally in recent years, placing substantial burdens on public health and causing significant economic losses to the poultry industry. Identifying spatial hotspots and key environmental drivers of HPAI is essential for improving surveillance efficiency and enabling targeted prevention strategies. This study aimed to identify spatial hotspots and cold spots of HPAI in Canada and determine the most influential predictors of HPAI occurrence at both national and local levels. Subdivision-level data were compiled from multiple sources, including reported HPAI cases in wild birds, waterfowl population density, poultry premises, weather and air quality indicators, vegetation cover, elevation, gross primary production, water bodies, and wildfire occurrence. Spatial cluster analyses using Getis-Ord Gi* and Anselin Moran's I were conducted to detect hotspots and cold spots and generate risk maps. Generalized Additive Models (GAM), XGBoost, and Random Forest Regression (RFR) were compared using R-squared score, root mean square error, and mean absolute error, and Shapley Additive exPlanations were applied to the machine learning models to quantify predictor importance. Consistent HPAI hotspots were identified in southwestern British Columbia, central and southern Alberta, southern Ontario, and the Atlantic provinces, while cold spots were observed in several central and northern regions. Hotspots of HPAI in domestic birds coincided with hotspots in wild birds, indicating that poultry and bird farms located in these areas are at higher risk of infection. GAM achieved the highest cross-validation accuracy, with XGBoost slightly outperforming RFR. Across all models, waterfowl population density, poultry premises, vegetation metrics including gross primary production, and air quality emerged as the most influential predictors. These findings provide actionable insights to support risk-based HPAI surveillance, targeted biosecurity interventions, and improved resource allocation in Canada.
SN - 2352-7714
ER -