Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYVeterinary and animal science

Protective effects of nano-zinc and nano-selenium compared with a toxin binder in broiler chickens fed aflatoxin B1-contaminated diets through antioxidant, immune, and skeletal responses.

  1. 1Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Ilam University, Pajouhesh Blvd, Ilam, Ilam, 6939177111, Iran.
  2. 2Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Arak University, Shahid Beheshti Street, Arak, Markazi Province, 38156-8-8349, Iran.

Abstract

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) can impair broiler performance, redox balance, and skeletal health. This 42-day study evaluated whether partial replacement of conventional inorganic zinc (Zn) and selenium (Se) sources with nanoforms could mitigate AFB1-associated responses and compared this source-substitution strategy with the use of commercial toxin binder. A total of 792 day-old male Ross 308 broilers were allocated to six treatments (6 replicate pens/treatment, 22 birds/pen; pen served as the experimental unit): Control; AF (0.5 mg AFB1/kg); AF+TB (2 g toxin binder/kg); AF+NZ (40 mg Zn/kg supplied as nano-zinc in place of an equivalent amount from zinc sulfate); AF+NS (0.1 mg Se/kg supplied as nano-selenium in place of an equivalent amount from sodium selenite); and AF+NZ+NS (combined nano-Zn and nano-Se partial replacement). Supplemental Zn and Se were maintained at 120 and 0.3 mg/kg, respectively. Relative to AF, AF+TB and AF+NZ+NS increased body weight gain by 9.7% and 6.3%, feed efficiency by 6.8% and 5.7%, total antioxidant capacity by 37.6% and 34.5%, and serum GSH by 38.6% and 35.7%, respectively, while reducing serum MDA by 31.0% and 32.1% (P < 0.05). Both treatments also improved selected immunoglobulin measures, hepatic expression of NFE2L2, GPX1, and SOD1, culture-based bacterial counts, tibial length and tibia ash content, although AF+NZ+NS did not consistently outperform the single nano-mineral treatments and did not fully restore the control phenotype. Under the conditions of this 42-day, 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 challenge, combined partial replacement with nano-Zn and nano-Se improved several measured responses, including productive performance, antioxidant status, and tibia quality.

Related

  1. Selenium nanoparticles modulate physiological, biochemical, and gene expression responses under drought stress in Echium italicum
    Behnam Gheisary, Mohammad Fattahi, Hadi Alipour
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPlant biologyCrossref
  2. Purified Dietary Aflatoxin B₁ Does Not Impair Broiler Growth Across a Broad Exposure Range but Elicits Subclinical Biological and Tissue Responses.
    Qiaomin Duan, Wanjun Zhang, Ying Liu +4
    ToxinsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
  3. Dietary Selenium-Enriched Bacillus subtilis Improves Feed Utilization and Modulates Selected Responses to LPS Challenge in Laying Hens
    Qiaoqiao Han, Yaru Wang, Yiyang Chen +7
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Metabolite Profiling, Modulation of Glucose Metabolism and Antioxidant Activity Reveals the Protective Effect of Sulfated Polysaccharides From Gracilaria gracilis in Hepatic Tissues of Type 2 Diabetic Rats.
    Lethiwe Mpungose, Tosin A Olasehinde, Ochuko L Erukainure +3
    Food science & nutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyEurope PMC
  5. Loss of ALN Function in Arabidopsis thaliana Induces Allantoin Accumulation and Enhances Antioxidant Enzyme Responses to Copper Toxicity
    Klaudia Bylińska, Beata Michniewska, Weronika Rusin +2
    Plants (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{mohsin2026protective,
  title = {{Protective effects of nano-zinc and nano-selenium compared with a toxin binder in broiler chickens fed aflatoxin B1-contaminated diets through antioxidant, immune, and skeletal responses.}},
  author = {Fouad Kadhim Mohsin and Kamran Taherpour and Hossein Ali Ghasemi and Hassan Shirzadi and Fatemeh Tavakolinasab},
  journal = {Veterinary and animal science},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.vas.2026.100888},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898093},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Protective effects of nano-zinc and nano-selenium compared with a toxin binder in broiler chickens fed aflatoxin B1-contaminated diets through antioxidant, immune, and skeletal responses.
AU  - Fouad Kadhim Mohsin
AU  - Kamran Taherpour
AU  - Hossein Ali Ghasemi
AU  - Hassan Shirzadi
AU  - Fatemeh Tavakolinasab
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - Veterinary and animal science
DO  - 10.1016/j.vas.2026.100888
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42898093
AB  - Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) can impair broiler performance, redox balance, and skeletal health. This 42-day study evaluated whether partial replacement of conventional inorganic zinc (Zn) and selenium (Se) sources with nanoforms could mitigate AFB1-associated responses and compared this source-substitution strategy with the use of commercial toxin binder. A total of 792 day-old male Ross 308 broilers were allocated to six treatments (6 replicate pens/treatment, 22 birds/pen; pen served as the experimental unit): Control; AF (0.5 mg AFB1/kg); AF+TB (2 g toxin binder/kg); AF+NZ (40 mg Zn/kg supplied as nano-zinc in place of an equivalent amount from zinc sulfate); AF+NS (0.1 mg Se/kg supplied as nano-selenium in place of an equivalent amount from sodium selenite); and AF+NZ+NS (combined nano-Zn and nano-Se partial replacement). Supplemental Zn and Se were maintained at 120 and 0.3 mg/kg, respectively. Relative to AF, AF+TB and AF+NZ+NS increased body weight gain by 9.7% and 6.3%, feed efficiency by 6.8% and 5.7%, total antioxidant capacity by 37.6% and 34.5%, and serum GSH by 38.6% and 35.7%, respectively, while reducing serum MDA by 31.0% and 32.1% (P < 0.05). Both treatments also improved selected immunoglobulin measures, hepatic expression of NFE2L2, GPX1, and SOD1, culture-based bacterial counts, tibial length and tibia ash content, although AF+NZ+NS did not consistently outperform the single nano-mineral treatments and did not fully restore the control phenotype. Under the conditions of this 42-day, 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 challenge, combined partial replacement with nano-Zn and nano-Se improved several measured responses, including productive performance, antioxidant status, and tibia quality.
SN  - 2451-943X
ER  -