Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDMalaria journal

Malaria diagnosis practices in formal private drug retail shops in the Ho Municipality, Ghana: a cross-sectional survey.

8 affiliations
  1. 1Disease Control Unit, Bole District Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Bole, Savanna Region, Ghana.
  2. 2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Fred Newton Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Volta Region, Ghana.
  3. 3Volta Regional Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Hohoe, Volta Region, Ghana.
  4. 4Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana. [email protected].
  5. 5Disease Control Unit, Talensi District Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Talensi, Tongo, Upper East Region, Ghana.
  6. 6Office of the Regional Director, Northern Regional Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Tamale, Northern Region, Ghana.
  7. 7Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Fred Newton Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Volta Region, Ghana.
  8. 8Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.

Abstract

Background

Private drug retail outlets, including community pharmacies and over the counter medicine sellers (OTCMS), play a major role in malaria case management in Ghana. Appropriate diagnosis before treatment is essential for effective malaria control. Evidence on the availability and use of malaria diagnostic services in these outlets remains limited in many municipalities. This study assessed the current diagnostic practices and challenges of malaria diagnosis in formal private drug retail shops in the Ho Municipality, Ghana.Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted in selected formal private drug retail shops in the Ho Municipality, Volta Region, Ghana. Data were collected through phone interviews using structured questionnaires with the attendants and frontline staff of private drug retail shops. The study sample comprised 86 formal private drug retail shops, including both OTMS and Community Pharmacies. Information covered socio-demographic characteristics, availability and type of malaria diagnostic tests, training in malaria diagnosis, cost of testing, and respondents' views on malaria diagnosis. Data were summarized using frequencies and percentages.Results

Of the 86 facilities surveyed, 70 (81.4%) were OTCMS and 16 (18.6%) were pharmacies. Most respondents were aged 46 to 60 years (38.4%) and slightly more were male (51.2%). Malaria testing capacity was limited. Only 33 (38.4%) facilities had the diagnostic capacity for malaria, while 53 (61.6%) had no testing capability. All community pharmacies had malaria testing capacity compared with 24.2% of OTCMS. Testing before treatment was routinely practiced in only 11.6% of facilities, while 61.6% never tested before treatment. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) were the only diagnostic method available, and microscopy was not used in any shop. Among facilities that stocked RDTs, common types included HRP2 antigen tests and HRP2/pLDH combination kits. Most respondents (76.7%) had received training in malaria diagnosis, mainly organized by the Pharmacy Council. Malaria testing typically cost between USD 0.98 and USD 1.63 in most facilities offering the service. Concerns raised by respondents included perceived inconsistency between test results and clinical judgement, the relatively high cost of test kits, and the need for stronger public education on malaria diagnostic guidelines.Conclusions

Malaria diagnostic services remain limited in formal private drug retail shops in the Ho Municipality, particularly among OTCMS. Although most staff have received training, routine testing before treatment is uncommon and many facilities lack diagnostic capacity. Strengthening access to rapid diagnostic tests, improving adherence to test before treat guidelines, and subsidizing test kits could improve malaria case management in these shops.

Related

  1. Fibrosis quística en América Latina: prácticas clínicas, diagnóstico y acceso terapéutico. Estudio transversal multicéntrico Cystic Fibrosis in Latin America: Clinical Practices, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Access: a Multicenter Cross-sectional Study
    Michelle Higuera Carrillo, María Cristina Arregui, María Soledad Arcucci +11
    Acta gastroenterologica LatinoamericanaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Sudanese medical professionals regarding the 2023 Sudan malaria treatment protocol: a cross-sectional study.
    Yousif Omer Elgaili Yousif, Rayan Mohamed Issa Kheerallah, Maab Khalifa Mohamed Ahmed +13
    Malaria journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. Predictors of malaria prevention practices among HIV-positive patients attending an antiretroviral therapy clinic in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study
    A. AMBROSE, M. Kabangi, J. Mwaka
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textInfectious diseasemedRxiv
  4. Access to malaria diagnosis and treatment in Zambia in the context of scaling-up community case management: results from repeated national cross-sectional surveys
    Z. Mao, A. Bennett, K. Silumbe +9
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. Access to malaria diagnosis and treatment in Zambia in the context of scaling-up community case management: Results from repeated national cross-sectional surveys
    Zhiyuan Mao, Adam Bennett, Kafula Silumbe +9
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
BibTeX
@article{saaka2026malaria,
  title = {{Malaria diagnosis practices in formal private drug retail shops in the Ho Municipality, Ghana: a cross-sectional survey.}},
  author = {Shaibu Saaka and Victor Loglo and Vincent Uwumboriyhie Gmayinaam and Derrick Atandaa Aboyinga and Chrysantus Kubio and Mawuli Komla Kushitor and Evelyn Korkor Ansah},
  journal = {Malaria journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12936-026-06068-8},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907829},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Malaria diagnosis practices in formal private drug retail shops in the Ho Municipality, Ghana: a cross-sectional survey.
AU  - Shaibu Saaka
AU  - Victor Loglo
AU  - Vincent Uwumboriyhie Gmayinaam
AU  - Derrick Atandaa Aboyinga
AU  - Chrysantus Kubio
AU  - Mawuli Komla Kushitor
AU  - Evelyn Korkor Ansah
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Malaria journal
DO  - 10.1186/s12936-026-06068-8
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907829
AB  - Background  Private drug retail outlets, including community pharmacies and over the counter medicine sellers (OTCMS), play a major role in malaria case management in Ghana. Appropriate diagnosis before treatment is essential for effective malaria control. Evidence on the availability and use of malaria diagnostic services in these outlets remains limited in many municipalities. This study assessed the current diagnostic practices and challenges of malaria diagnosis in formal private drug retail shops in the Ho Municipality, Ghana.Methods  A cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted in selected formal private drug retail shops in the Ho Municipality, Volta Region, Ghana. Data were collected through phone interviews using structured questionnaires with the attendants and frontline staff of private drug retail shops. The study sample comprised 86 formal private drug retail shops, including both OTMS and Community Pharmacies. Information covered socio-demographic characteristics, availability and type of malaria diagnostic tests, training in malaria diagnosis, cost of testing, and respondents' views on malaria diagnosis. Data were summarized using frequencies and percentages.Results  Of the 86 facilities surveyed, 70 (81.4%) were OTCMS and 16 (18.6%) were pharmacies. Most respondents were aged 46 to 60 years (38.4%) and slightly more were male (51.2%). Malaria testing capacity was limited. Only 33 (38.4%) facilities had the diagnostic capacity for malaria, while 53 (61.6%) had no testing capability. All community pharmacies had malaria testing capacity compared with 24.2% of OTCMS. Testing before treatment was routinely practiced in only 11.6% of facilities, while 61.6% never tested before treatment. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) were the only diagnostic method available, and microscopy was not used in any shop. Among facilities that stocked RDTs, common types included HRP2 antigen tests and HRP2/pLDH combination kits. Most respondents (76.7%) had received training in malaria diagnosis, mainly organized by the Pharmacy Council. Malaria testing typically cost between USD 0.98 and USD 1.63 in most facilities offering the service. Concerns raised by respondents included perceived inconsistency between test results and clinical judgement, the relatively high cost of test kits, and the need for stronger public education on malaria diagnostic guidelines.Conclusions  Malaria diagnostic services remain limited in formal private drug retail shops in the Ho Municipality, particularly among OTCMS. Although most staff have received training, routine testing before treatment is uncommon and many facilities lack diagnostic capacity. Strengthening access to rapid diagnostic tests, improving adherence to test before treat guidelines, and subsidizing test kits could improve malaria case management in these shops.
SN  - 1475-2875
ER  -