Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Bridging the gap: A qualitative study on veterans’ experiences with systemic barriers and support during transition

6 affiliations
  1. 1VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
  2. 2Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
  3. 3VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds, Massachusetts, United States of America
  4. 4University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America
  5. 5VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts, United States of America
  6. 6Department of Veteran Affairs, Washington, D.C., United States of America

Abstract

Many veterans face complex challenges during the transition from military to civilian life, particularly when navigating healthcare and benefits systems. This qualitative study examines how recently separated veterans with service‑connected musculoskeletal disorders perceive and navigate systemic barriers within Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs transition and healthcare systems. Semi‑structured interviews were conducted with 20 veterans within one year of separation who had filed a musculoskeletal service‑connection claim. Using a rapid qualitative analytic approach, interviews captured experiences with the discharge process, transition programming, and efforts to access healthcare and benefits. Analysis identified four major themes: the interaction of physical, psychological, and bureaucratic stressors during discharge, particularly salient for those managing musculoskeletal conditions; varied and often critical views of transition programming, which many perceived as generic and misaligned with individual needs; systemic barriers to care and benefits, including delays, fragmented processes, and cultural norms that discourage disclosure; and recommendations emphasizing continuity of care, case management, and emotional support to address identity disruption and loss of purpose. Overall, the findings highlight persistent structural and cultural obstacles that complicate transition and hinder early engagement with services. Improved coordination, continuity‑oriented supports, and psychologically responsive programming may reduce these barriers. Further research is needed to evaluate scalable models that enhance early post‑separation outcomes.

Related

  1. Experiences of rehabilitation exercise during the transition from hospital to home among older patients following lung cancer surgery: a qualitative study guided by the social ecological model
    Luga Dong, Yuanyuan Chen, Yi Shang +5
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  2. A Qualitative Exploratory Study of Pathways to Moral Repair and Moral Injury in U.S. Veterans
    Hannah E. Walker, Zoe R. Styler, Erin P. Finley +1
    Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  3. Staff perceptions of an NHS military veterans mental health service in the UK: A qualitative evaluation
    S. Talwar, C. Carlos Osorio, E. Barslund Blackman +7
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  4. The lived experiences of sexual and gender minority individuals in Guyana: a qualitative investigation into well-being
    Gregory A. Kanhai, Drexler James
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Beneficiary experiences in the Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program: a qualitative focus group study
    Wendi Rotunda, Sara R. Jacobs, Nikie Sarris Esquivel +1
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{ingram2026bridging,
  title = {{Bridging the gap: A qualitative study on veterans’ experiences with systemic barriers and support during transition}},
  author = {Polly Ingram and Amanda Mele and Christina M. Lazar and Kristin Mattocks and Megan Kelly and Sara Edmond and Marc I. Rosen and Adrienne Weede and Jennifer Perez and Steve Martino},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0361285},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361285},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Bridging the gap: A qualitative study on veterans’ experiences with systemic barriers and support during transition
AU  - Polly Ingram
AU  - Amanda Mele
AU  - Christina M. Lazar
AU  - Kristin Mattocks
AU  - Megan Kelly
AU  - Sara Edmond
AU  - Marc I. Rosen
AU  - Adrienne Weede
AU  - Jennifer Perez
AU  - Steve Martino
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0361285
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361285
AB  - Many veterans face complex challenges during the transition from military to civilian life, particularly when navigating healthcare and benefits systems. This qualitative study examines how recently separated veterans with service‑connected musculoskeletal disorders perceive and navigate systemic barriers within Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs transition and healthcare systems. Semi‑structured interviews were conducted with 20 veterans within one year of separation who had filed a musculoskeletal service‑connection claim. Using a rapid qualitative analytic approach, interviews captured experiences with the discharge process, transition programming, and efforts to access healthcare and benefits. Analysis identified four major themes: the interaction of physical, psychological, and bureaucratic stressors during discharge, particularly salient for those managing musculoskeletal conditions; varied and often critical views of transition programming, which many perceived as generic and misaligned with individual needs; systemic barriers to care and benefits, including delays, fragmented processes, and cultural norms that discourage disclosure; and recommendations emphasizing continuity of care, case management, and emotional support to address identity disruption and loss of purpose. Overall, the findings highlight persistent structural and cultural obstacles that complicate transition and hinder early engagement with services. Improved coordination, continuity‑oriented supports, and psychologically responsive programming may reduce these barriers. Further research is needed to evaluate scalable models that enhance early post‑separation outcomes.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -