Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
223,421 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAdvances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Multidisciplinary follow-up of oral cavity cancer patients in a hub-and-spoke network: A service evaluation of a monthly post-treatment clinic in Swindon, United Kingdom

  1. 1Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, United Kingdom; Corresponding author. Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, United Kingdom.
  2. 2Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, United Kingdom
  3. 3Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, United Kingdom; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Head and neck cancer follow-up requires oncological surveillance together with multidisciplinary rehabilitation. The 2024 United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines recommend follow-up in clinics at, or linked to, a head and neck treatment centre, with access to the wider multidisciplinary team. This service evaluation describes a spoke-based post-treatment oral cavity cancer clinic at Great Western Hospital (GWH), Swindon, linked to the Oxford University Hospitals (OUH) tertiary head and neck service. Methods: Service activity between November 2022 and August 2024 was reviewed descriptively. The clinic is held monthly, but individual patients attend according to guideline-based follow-up intervals. A locally developed anonymous patient-experience questionnaire was distributed between May and August 2024; overall satisfaction used a 10-point numerical rating scale and free-text responses explored perceived benefits and opportunities for improvement. Results: Sixty-one patients attended the clinic and seven recurrences (11%) were identified during follow-up. No cancer-related emergency department attendances were recorded in the service-evaluation dataset. Thirty patients completed the questionnaire; all rated overall satisfaction as 9 or 10 out of 10 and 93% reported no change was required. Frequently reported benefits were coordinated same-day specialist review, continuity with a consistent team and reduced travel. Conclusion: A hub-and-spoke model can deliver guideline-aligned surveillance and multidisciplinary rehabilitation closer to patients' homes while retaining a direct route back to the tertiary cancer service. The most transferable elements of the Swindon model are consultant continuity across hub and spoke sites, coordinated rehabilitation, prospective pathway tracking by a dedicated coordinator and rapid re-escalation to the tertiary MDT when recurrence or complex morbidity is suspected.

Related

  1. Development of a multidisciplinary service-delivery framework for venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalized medical patients with lung cancer: a mixed-methods modified Delphi study
    Yanhong Meng, Sijia Zhong, Yuhang Ding +4
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicineCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  2. A Multidisciplinary Neuro-Lupus Program for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With SLE and Cognitive Concerns
    Douglas R. Wilcox, Erin E. Mathieu, Emma L. Weizenbaum +3
    Neurology: Clinical PracticePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  3. Association of geriatric assessment with multidisciplinary treatment recommendations and treatment concordance among older patients with breast cancer
    Yihua Jin, Jing Yu, Xu Zhang +3
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  4. Association of a structured nutrition-centred multidisciplinary supportive-care program with treatment tolerance and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing precision radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective cohort study
    Na Su, Zhongchao Huo, Zhiwei Zhang +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  5. Retrospective evaluation of multidisciplinary perioperative hemostatic management in oral surgery for patients with hemophilia
    Tae Young Jung
    Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeonsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@article{gebahi2026multidisciplinary,
  title = {{Multidisciplinary follow-up of oral cavity cancer patients in a hub-and-spoke network: A service evaluation of a monthly post-treatment clinic in Swindon, United Kingdom}},
  author = {Fatma Gebahi and Meenakshi Mandi Jayaram and Ioanna Dimasi and Runa Hussain and Cheryl Davidse and Gemma Hudson and Gillian Franklin and Joanne Barrett and Montey Garg},
  journal = {Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1016/j.adoms.2026.100741},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adoms.2026.100741},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Multidisciplinary follow-up of oral cavity cancer patients in a hub-and-spoke network: A service evaluation of a monthly post-treatment clinic in Swindon, United Kingdom
AU  - Fatma Gebahi
AU  - Meenakshi Mandi Jayaram
AU  - Ioanna Dimasi
AU  - Runa Hussain
AU  - Cheryl Davidse
AU  - Gemma Hudson
AU  - Gillian Franklin
AU  - Joanne Barrett
AU  - Montey Garg
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/11
JO  - Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
DO  - 10.1016/j.adoms.2026.100741
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adoms.2026.100741
AB  - Background: Head and neck cancer follow-up requires oncological surveillance together with multidisciplinary rehabilitation. The 2024 United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines recommend follow-up in clinics at, or linked to, a head and neck treatment centre, with access to the wider multidisciplinary team. This service evaluation describes a spoke-based post-treatment oral cavity cancer clinic at Great Western Hospital (GWH), Swindon, linked to the Oxford University Hospitals (OUH) tertiary head and neck service. Methods: Service activity between November 2022 and August 2024 was reviewed descriptively. The clinic is held monthly, but individual patients attend according to guideline-based follow-up intervals. A locally developed anonymous patient-experience questionnaire was distributed between May and August 2024; overall satisfaction used a 10-point numerical rating scale and free-text responses explored perceived benefits and opportunities for improvement. Results: Sixty-one patients attended the clinic and seven recurrences (11%) were identified during follow-up. No cancer-related emergency department attendances were recorded in the service-evaluation dataset. Thirty patients completed the questionnaire; all rated overall satisfaction as 9 or 10 out of 10 and 93% reported no change was required. Frequently reported benefits were coordinated same-day specialist review, continuity with a consistent team and reduced travel. Conclusion: A hub-and-spoke model can deliver guideline-aligned surveillance and multidisciplinary rehabilitation closer to patients' homes while retaining a direct route back to the tertiary cancer service. The most transferable elements of the Swindon model are consultant continuity across hub and spoke sites, coordinated rehabilitation, prospective pathway tracking by a dedicated coordinator and rapid re-escalation to the tertiary MDT when recurrence or complex morbidity is suspected.
SN  - 2667-1476
ER  -