Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A counterexample to a three-step convergence bound for BFGS with exact line search

Abstract

We disprove a three-step error estimate for the Broyden--Fletcher--Goldfarb--Shanno {(BFGS)} method with exact line searches. We construct a globally strongly convex function F∈ C∞(ℝ3) and a single nonterminating trajectory xk→0 for which limsupk→∞|xk+3|/(|xk+2||xk|)=+∞. The Hessian of F lies between 1/2 I and 3/2 I everywhere, and F(x)−1/2|x|2 is compactly supported with all derivatives vanishing at $0$. The proof first constructs point-gradient pairs satisfying the exact BFGS step identities. A five-step cycle produces a large three-step quotient and restores an invariant plane for the actual updated matrix, allowing the cycle to be repeated with arbitrarily small gradient errors. Disjoint smooth corrections to a quadratic then realize all the pairs by one objective. Strong convexity identifies the prescribed points with the unique exact line-search minimizers. Thus smoothness and strong convexity do not imply the proposed product estimate, even for an objective that agrees with a quadratic to every order at its minimizer.

Related

  1. A Counterexample to Yau's Conjectured Asymptotic Scalar-Curvature Integral Bound
    Tianze Hao, Jintian Zhu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  2. A Counterexample to the Alon-Krivelevich Conjecture and a New Lower Bound for Choosability of Bipartite Graphs
    Junran Yu, Gexin Yu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. The Exact Boundary of Linear Optimality in Witsenhausen's Counterexample
    Yikai Lu, Tongxin Li
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. A counterexample to Nagamochi's scoring lemma and a new rectangle packing bound
    Hakan Karakuş
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. A Counterexample to the Exact Eight-Point Angular-Energy Conjecture
    Jinze Zhao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{xu2026counterexample,
  title = {{A counterexample to a three-step convergence bound for BFGS with exact line search}},
  author = {Jiawei Xu and Jiang Hu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.02719},
  eprint = {2611.02719},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02719},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A counterexample to a three-step convergence bound for BFGS with exact line search
AU  - Jiawei Xu
AU  - Jiang Hu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.02719
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02719
AB  - We disprove a three-step error estimate for the Broyden--Fletcher--Goldfarb--Shanno {(BFGS)} method with exact line searches. We construct a globally strongly convex function F∈ C^∞(ℝ^3) and a single nonterminating trajectory x_k→0 for which limsup_k→∞|x_k+3|/(|x_k+2||x_k|)=+∞. The Hessian of F lies between 1/2 I and 3/2 I everywhere, and F(x)−1/2|x|^2 is compactly supported with all derivatives vanishing at $0$. The proof first constructs point-gradient pairs satisfying the exact BFGS step identities. A five-step cycle produces a large three-step quotient and restores an invariant plane for the actual updated matrix, allowing the cycle to be repeated with arbitrarily small gradient errors. Disjoint smooth corrections to a quadratic then realize all the pairs by one objective. Strong convexity identifies the prescribed points with the unique exact line-search minimizers. Thus smoothness and strong convexity do not imply the proposed product estimate, even for an objective that agrees with a quadratic to every order at its minimizer.
ER  -