Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Risk-Calibrated Balancing for High-Dimensional Causal Extrapolation

Abstract

In observational causal inference, covariate balancing is widely used to reduce source-target covariate shift, but under weak overlap in high dimensions, stronger balance can induce concentrated weights and increase variance. Balance measures how well the target covariate distribution is represented, but does not by itself determine how reliably the counterfactual mean can be estimated. We develop risk-calibrated balancing for the average treatment effect on the treated, which applies ridge augmentation to any normalised base weights and selects its penalty using conditional prediction risk of the counterfactual mean. Under a random-effects predictive model, we derive an exact finite-sample decomposition of this risk into residual covariate imbalance and weight-induced variance. For design-independent base weights under proportional asymptotics, we characterise how limiting risk depends on source and target covariance geometry, population mean shift, and weight concentration. For covariate-adaptive base weights, we develop a uniformly consistent target-aware risk estimator whose minimiser attains vanishing scaled oracle excess risk. Simulations show that the high-dimensional risk predictions remain informative for adaptive balancing and that target-aware tuning generally reduces excess target risk. Empirical analyses of job-training and single-cell perturbation data show that risk-calibrated balancing generally improves on the corresponding base estimators, with larger gains under weaker overlap.

Related

  1. Proximal Balancing for Causal Effect Estimation under Unmeasured Confounding
    Yonghan Jung
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Calibrated Bayesian inference for overall and subgroup-specific causal effects in stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials
    Ruyi Liu, Yuki Ohnishi, Xi Fang +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Proximal causal inference through cross-proxy balancing
    Grace V. Ringlein, Trang Q. Nguyen, Elizabeth A. Stuart +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Into the danger zone: stable extrapolation in high-dimensional function and operator learning
    Ben Adcock, Simone Brugiapaglia, Xuemeng Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingStatisticsarXiv
  5. Analytically Calibrated Upper L-Statistics for High-Dimensional Mean Change-Point Testing
    Guowei Yan, Dan Zhuang, Long Feng
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{yang2026riskcalibrated,
  title = {{Risk-Calibrated Balancing for High-Dimensional Causal Extrapolation}},
  author = {Fenglin Yang and Haoran Lei and Yan Chen and Jin-Hong Du},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.34482},
  eprint = {2609.34482},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34482},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Risk-Calibrated Balancing for High-Dimensional Causal Extrapolation
AU  - Fenglin Yang
AU  - Haoran Lei
AU  - Yan Chen
AU  - Jin-Hong Du
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.34482
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34482
AB  - In observational causal inference, covariate balancing is widely used to reduce source-target covariate shift, but under weak overlap in high dimensions, stronger balance can induce concentrated weights and increase variance. Balance measures how well the target covariate distribution is represented, but does not by itself determine how reliably the counterfactual mean can be estimated. We develop risk-calibrated balancing for the average treatment effect on the treated, which applies ridge augmentation to any normalised base weights and selects its penalty using conditional prediction risk of the counterfactual mean. Under a random-effects predictive model, we derive an exact finite-sample decomposition of this risk into residual covariate imbalance and weight-induced variance. For design-independent base weights under proportional asymptotics, we characterise how limiting risk depends on source and target covariance geometry, population mean shift, and weight concentration. For covariate-adaptive base weights, we develop a uniformly consistent target-aware risk estimator whose minimiser attains vanishing scaled oracle excess risk. Simulations show that the high-dimensional risk predictions remain informative for adaptive balancing and that target-aware tuning generally reduces excess target risk. Empirical analyses of job-training and single-cell perturbation data show that risk-calibrated balancing generally improves on the corresponding base estimators, with larger gains under weaker overlap.
ER  -