Exploring nematode diversity in soils: comparison of extraction methods and sequencing protocols
- 1Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL
Abstract
Soil nematodes play key roles in regulating organic matter decomposition, nutrient cycling and trophic interactions in the soil ecosystem, and are very useful bioindicators of soil condition and soil health. But to characterise them, we need reliable measurements of nematode biodiversity in soils. DNA-based techniques such as metabarcoding have recently explored their biodiversity, with successful results. However, there are many methodological steps that can modify the outcome considerably and require informed decisions. In this study, we tested the effect on nematode alpha and beta diversity metrics of three methodological steps, namely i) type of extraction of genetic material from the matrix, either from soil directly with different starting amount of material or extracting nematodes first via the Baermann or Oostenbrink methods, ii) the choice of taxonomically-relevant DNA segment for amplification, with a nematode specific primer (NemF/18Sr2b) and a universal eukaryotic primer (3NDf/1132rmod), both within 18S rDNA, and iii) the selection of appropriate reference library for taxonomic assignment (comparing three nematode specialised databases and three broad taxonomic databases). Observed differences in alpha diversity were more pronounced when comparing the nematode extraction vs soil extractions. In particular, direct soil extractions co-extracted many non-nematode taxa, especially if amplified with a universal primer, which can significantly reduce the number of nematode reads obtained and therefore the accuracy of nematode community indexes and other nematode-based metrics. The choice of the reference database strongly affected the taxonomic identification, which calls for extreme caution when making this selection. Notably, specialised databases tended to over assign reads to nematodes that were detected as non-nematodes by broad taxonomic databases. However, beta diversity metrics were consistent across methods, highlighting these metrics as robust against methodological choices. Our study clearly demonstrates that the choices of methods for nematode biodiversity studies using molecular tools can have a big impact on the results, and decisions should be made consciously and carefully.
Related
- Optimizing tissue lysis and DNA extraction protocols to enhance bacterial diversity profiling in the Drosophila melanogaster gut microbiome
- Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS) uncovers genetic diversity and population structure for salicornia breeding programs in Iran
- Genetic diversity of Legionella species in culture-negative clinical and environmental specimens by sequencing the 23S-5S ribosomal intergenic spacer region
- Separating Faces in ARMS Metabarcoding Improves Marine Biodiversity Monitoring: A Comparison Across Protocols, Experimental Designs and Photographic Surveys
- Comparison of two repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation protocols for upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized trial
BibTeX
@misc{fioratti2026exploring,
title = {{Exploring nematode diversity in soils: comparison of extraction methods and sequencing protocols}},
author = {M. Fioratti and S. Brodbeck and S. Gombeer and L. van Sluijs and J. Riksen and B. Frey and A. Kempel and C. Rixen and M. Schaub and A. C. Risch and I. Cordero},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.29.755246},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.29.755246v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Exploring nematode diversity in soils: comparison of extraction methods and sequencing protocols
AU - M. Fioratti
AU - S. Brodbeck
AU - S. Gombeer
AU - L. van Sluijs
AU - J. Riksen
AU - B. Frey
AU - A. Kempel
AU - C. Rixen
AU - M. Schaub
AU - A. C. Risch
AU - I. Cordero
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/29
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.29.755246
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.29.755246v1
AB - Soil nematodes play key roles in regulating organic matter decomposition, nutrient cycling and trophic interactions in the soil ecosystem, and are very useful bioindicators of soil condition and soil health. But to characterise them, we need reliable measurements of nematode biodiversity in soils. DNA-based techniques such as metabarcoding have recently explored their biodiversity, with successful results. However, there are many methodological steps that can modify the outcome considerably and require informed decisions. In this study, we tested the effect on nematode alpha and beta diversity metrics of three methodological steps, namely i) type of extraction of genetic material from the matrix, either from soil directly with different starting amount of material or extracting nematodes first via the Baermann or Oostenbrink methods, ii) the choice of taxonomically-relevant DNA segment for amplification, with a nematode specific primer (NemF/18Sr2b) and a universal eukaryotic primer (3NDf/1132rmod), both within 18S rDNA, and iii) the selection of appropriate reference library for taxonomic assignment (comparing three nematode specialised databases and three broad taxonomic databases). Observed differences in alpha diversity were more pronounced when comparing the nematode extraction vs soil extractions. In particular, direct soil extractions co-extracted many non-nematode taxa, especially if amplified with a universal primer, which can significantly reduce the number of nematode reads obtained and therefore the accuracy of nematode community indexes and other nematode-based metrics. The choice of the reference database strongly affected the taxonomic identification, which calls for extreme caution when making this selection. Notably, specialised databases tended to over assign reads to nematodes that were detected as non-nematodes by broad taxonomic databases. However, beta diversity metrics were consistent across methods, highlighting these metrics as robust against methodological choices. Our study clearly demonstrates that the choices of methods for nematode biodiversity studies using molecular tools can have a big impact on the results, and decisions should be made consciously and carefully.
ER -