Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0HAL

The cost of an exact position: tolerant losses, integrated positions and detection thresholds for change-points

Abstract

In exact Bayes rules for change-points, the penalty of a change-point decomposes into a localisation cost of 2 log n, for specifying its position among n candidates, and a dimension cost of order log n per changing coefficient. We show that, for small jumps, the localisation cost is determined by the loss. We introduce losses that tolerate an error of w positions on each change-point, bridging the exact 0–1 loss and a counting loss whose Bayes rule is the posterior mode of the number of change-points. For one small change in a Gaussian mean, the counting rule sums the Bayes factors over all positions; the effective number of positions has a limit law involving a functional of a Brownian motion with drift, and the detection threshold on the squared standardised jump falls from 3 log n to log n. In exchange, the false alarm rate, which still vanishes, is bounded by n^(-1/2) rather than n^(-1), up to logarithmic factors. For several change-points, we prove a band, stated with joint energies, between the thresholds of the two rules. In regression with q changing coefficients, the exact rule needs (2+q) log n, and we conjecture that the counting rule relaxes this to q log n. Simulations compare the rules with other criteria.

Related

  1. Adaptive Reliability-Aware Nonlinear State Estimation Framework for GNSS/INS Integrated Navigation with Bounded Position Correction
    Shizhong Yang, Zhen Liu, Liuyang Jiang +1
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  2. Optimal detection of geometry in random graphs and kernel matrices at critical thresholds
    Cheng Mao, Timothy L. H. Wee
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityStatisticsarXiv
  3. Sharp detection thresholds for random geometric graphs with polynomial average degrees
    Hang Du, Cheng Mao, Nike Sun +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityStatisticsarXiv
  4. SCE-YOLO: Campus Abnormal Behavior Detection via Spatial-Frequency Enhancement and Dynamic Position Awareness
    Ya Li, Gufeng Gong, Mingfang He
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  5. Quickest Change Detection with Diffusion-Integrated Scores
    Arman Adibi, Mohammadreza Maleki, Sanjeev Kulkarni +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{lyazrhi2026cost,
  title = {{The cost of an exact position: tolerant losses, integrated positions and detection thresholds for change-points}},
  author = {Faouzi Lyazrhi},
  howpublished = {HAL},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05792398v2},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The cost of an exact position: tolerant losses, integrated positions and detection thresholds for change-points
AU  - Faouzi Lyazrhi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/11
PB  - HAL
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05792398v2
AB  - In exact Bayes rules for change-points, the penalty of a change-point decomposes into a localisation cost of 2 log n, for specifying its position among n candidates, and a dimension cost of order log n per changing coefficient. We show that, for small jumps, the localisation cost is determined by the loss. We introduce losses that tolerate an error of w positions on each change-point, bridging the exact 0–1 loss and a counting loss whose Bayes rule is the posterior mode of the number of change-points. For one small change in a Gaussian mean, the counting rule sums the Bayes factors over all positions; the effective number of positions has a limit law involving a functional of a Brownian motion with drift, and the detection threshold on the squared standardised jump falls from 3 log n to log n. In exchange, the false alarm rate, which still vanishes, is bounded by n^(-1/2) rather than n^(-1), up to logarithmic factors. For several change-points, we prove a band, stated with joint energies, between the thresholds of the two rules. In regression with q changing coefficients, the exact rule needs (2+q) log n, and we conjecture that the counting rule relaxes this to q log n. Simulations compare the rules with other criteria.
ER  -