Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Bourgain's Lambda(p) selection theorem: a greedy proof with polynomial failure bounds

Abstract

We give a self-contained proof of Bourgain's finite Λ(p) selection theorem with an explicit probability bound. For every p>2 and N≥2, given N pairwise orthogonal functions bounded by one on a probability space, a uniformly chosen subsystem of cardinality ⌈ N2/p⌉ satisfies the Λ(p) inequality with probability at least 1−1/N, with a constant depending only on p. The inequality holds simultaneously for all complex coefficient vectors. More generally, for every fixed A>0, the success probability is at least 1−1/NA with a constant depending only on p and A, and independent of N. The proof uses a greedy approximation in Lr, with r>2, whose potential decreases throughout all approximation scales. A single weighted bound on the cumulative number of updates controls a union bound over discrete update histories, and increasing the weight assigned to each history gives the prescribed failure exponent without changing the cardinality exponent.

Related

  1. Bourgain's proof of the circular maximal theorem: an exposition
    Halit Yigit Gunduz, Jonathan Hickman
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  2. Lower bounds for some value sets over finite fields: incidence geometry and Bourgain's group expansion theorem
    Xiyu Hu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. Bourgain--Brezis selection maps for Hodge systems in Besov and Triebel--Lizorkin spaces
    Diogo Arsénio
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  4. Further bounds in the polynomial Szemerédi theorem
    Bartłomiej Bychawski, Bartosz Głowacki, Ivan Spyrydonov
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. A functional central limit theorem for particle systems under polynomial growth conditions, with applications to statistics
    Mark Podolskij, Fabrice Wunderlich
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{burstein2026bourgains,
  title = {{Bourgain's Lambda(p) selection theorem: a greedy proof with polynomial failure bounds}},
  author = {Will Burstein and Alex Iosevich and Ben Krause},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.12566},
  eprint = {2609.12566},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12566},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Bourgain's Lambda(p) selection theorem: a greedy proof with polynomial failure bounds
AU  - Will Burstein
AU  - Alex Iosevich
AU  - Ben Krause
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/11
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.12566
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12566
AB  - We give a self-contained proof of Bourgain's finite Λ(p) selection theorem with an explicit probability bound. For every p>2 and N≥2, given N pairwise orthogonal functions bounded by one on a probability space, a uniformly chosen subsystem of cardinality ⌈ N^2/p⌉ satisfies the Λ(p) inequality with probability at least 1−1/N, with a constant depending only on p. The inequality holds simultaneously for all complex coefficient vectors. More generally, for every fixed A>0, the success probability is at least 1−1/N^A with a constant depending only on p and A, and independent of N. The proof uses a greedy approximation in L^r, with r>2, whose potential decreases throughout all approximation scales. A single weighted bound on the cumulative number of updates controls a union bound over discrete update histories, and increasing the weight assigned to each history gives the prescribed failure exponent without changing the cardinality exponent.
ER  -