From structure to experience: a Spinozist framework for consciousness rooted in critical brain dynamics.
- 1Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 1 David Ben-Gurion Blvd., P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.
- 2School of Brain Sciences and Cognition, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 1 David Ben-Gurion Blvd., P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.
- 3Department of Jewish History, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 1 David Ben-Gurion Blvd., P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.
Abstract
The study of consciousness is divided between mechanistic accounts that overlook subjective experience and phenomenological approaches limited to neural correlates. We propose a unified framework by grounding our ConCrit model of consciousness and critical brain dynamics within Spinoza's ontological monism. Spinoza's principle of psycho-physical parallelism-mind and body as attributes of one substance-provides a metaphysical basis to dissolve the explanatory gap between neural processes and lived experience. Within this framework, three properties which are maximized near criticality correspond, under Spinoza's parallelism, to mental dimensions: entropy corresponds to experiential richness-the diversity of idea under the attribute of Thought, internal susceptibility to reflexive capacity or degrees of autonomy, and scale-free dynamics to the structural alignment with the common order of nature that, under the attribute of Thought, is expressed in adequate ideas. Thus, we propose that brain activity near criticality under the attribute of Extension is the very same phenomenon that, under the attribute of Thought, is conscious experience. This synthesis reinterprets leading theories-including Integrated Information Theory, Global Neuronal Workspace Theory, and the Entropic Brain Hypothesis-as complementary views of a shared underlying reality. By situating ConCrit within Spinoza's monism, we argue that consciousness is not emergent or epiphenomenal but the parallel manifestation of universal organizational principles, offering a conceptually unified and interpretively transparent framework for neuroscience.
Related
- Consciousness at the Edge of Death: Dark Retreat, Near-Death Experience, and Generative Brain Dynamics
- Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency As An Experience-Restricted Constraint On Visual Temporal Resolution: What Does And Does Not Change It
- Toward a Layered Framework of Environmental Experience: Integrating Sensory, Perceptual, and Semantic Processes
- A global–local momentum contrastive framework with critical feature calibration for field plant disease identification in precision agriculture
- From neuropeptide and receptor annotation to ligand-receptor pairing: a sequence- and structure-based framework for mapping the neuropeptide-receptor interactome in Gryllus bimaculatus
BibTeX
@article{algom2026from,
title = {{From structure to experience: a Spinozist framework for consciousness rooted in critical brain dynamics.}},
author = {Inbal Algom and Yehonatan Nachshoni and Moti Salti and Oren Shriki},
journal = {Neuroscience of consciousness},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/nc/niag066},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42936788},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - From structure to experience: a Spinozist framework for consciousness rooted in critical brain dynamics.
AU - Inbal Algom
AU - Yehonatan Nachshoni
AU - Moti Salti
AU - Oren Shriki
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
JO - Neuroscience of consciousness
DO - 10.1093/nc/niag066
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42936788
AB - The study of consciousness is divided between mechanistic accounts that overlook subjective experience and phenomenological approaches limited to neural correlates. We propose a unified framework by grounding our ConCrit model of consciousness and critical brain dynamics within Spinoza's ontological monism. Spinoza's principle of psycho-physical parallelism-mind and body as attributes of one substance-provides a metaphysical basis to dissolve the explanatory gap between neural processes and lived experience. Within this framework, three properties which are maximized near criticality correspond, under Spinoza's parallelism, to mental dimensions: entropy corresponds to experiential richness-the diversity of idea under the attribute of Thought, internal susceptibility to reflexive capacity or degrees of autonomy, and scale-free dynamics to the structural alignment with the common order of nature that, under the attribute of Thought, is expressed in adequate ideas. Thus, we propose that brain activity near criticality under the attribute of Extension is the very same phenomenon that, under the attribute of Thought, is conscious experience. This synthesis reinterprets leading theories-including Integrated Information Theory, Global Neuronal Workspace Theory, and the Entropic Brain Hypothesis-as complementary views of a shared underlying reality. By situating ConCrit within Spinoza's monism, we argue that consciousness is not emergent or epiphenomenal but the parallel manifestation of universal organizational principles, offering a conceptually unified and interpretively transparent framework for neuroscience.
SN - 2057-2107
ER -