Acupuncture for vascular dementia: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
- 1South China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Medical College of Acu-Moxi and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
- 2Department of Physiology, University of Auckland
- 3Monash Neuromodulation Research Unit, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University
Abstract
Objective: To systematically synthesize evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) regarding the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for vascular dementia (VD), evaluate the methodological and evidence quality, and characterize commonly used acupoint selection patterns through data mining.
Methods: Eight databases were searched from inception to October 2025. SRs/MAs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupuncture for VD were included. Methodological quality, completeness of reporting, and certainty of evidence were assessed using AMSTAR-2, PRISMA 2020, and GRADE, respectively. Furthermore, a secondary data mining analysis was conducted on primary RCTs to identify meridian and acupoint selection laws.
Results: Sixteen SRs/MAs were included. According to AMSTAR-2, only one review was of high quality, while 87.5% were rated low or critically low, primarily due to the lack of protocol registration. GRADE assessment indicated that 97.9% of outcomes were of low or very low certainty, mainly downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision. Most pooled estimates favored acupuncture for cognitive and functional outcomes, but certainty of evidence was predominantly low or very low according to GRADE criteria. A frequency analysis of the 242 unique RCTs identified the Governor Vessel (18.8% of meridian usage) and the acupoints GV20 (Baihui), EX-HN1 (Sishencong), and ST36 (Zusanli) among the most commonly used points; these patterns should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than validated treatment recommendations.
Conclusion: Current evidence indicates potential signals of benefit for acupuncture in VD, but findings remain inconclusive owing to prevalent methodological flaws and high heterogeneity in the primary trials. Future research should prioritize rigorous, large-scale, sham-controlled RCTs testing standardized candidate protocols to establish definitive evidence.
Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251180848 , identifier CRD420251180848.
Related
- Adverse experiences in childhood and adolescence in relation to sleep health in adulthood: An overview of systematic reviews and a global evidence map
- Climate Change’s Impact on Food and Nutrition Security: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
- Oligodendrocyte stress response as a driver of vascular dementia
- Value in app store metadata and user reviews: A dual perspective on quality of Parkinson’s and dementia apps
- Distance-dependent Functional Connectivity Strength Analysis Using Resting-State fMRI: Application to Vascular Cognitive Impairment, No Dementia
BibTeX
@article{chen2026acupuncture,
title = {{Acupuncture for vascular dementia: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis}},
author = {Yihao Chen and Yuqing Fan and Yichun Wang and Xin Li and Huize Lin and Xue Li and Xiaorong Tang and Nenggui Xu and Zhennan Wu},
journal = {Frontiers in Neuroscience},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fnins.2026.1796611},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2026.1796611/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Acupuncture for vascular dementia: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
AU - Yihao Chen
AU - Yuqing Fan
AU - Yichun Wang
AU - Xin Li
AU - Huize Lin
AU - Xue Li
AU - Xiaorong Tang
AU - Nenggui Xu
AU - Zhennan Wu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience
DO - 10.3389/fnins.2026.1796611
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2026.1796611/full
AB - Objective: To systematically synthesize evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) regarding the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for vascular dementia (VD), evaluate the methodological and evidence quality, and characterize commonly used acupoint selection patterns through data mining. Methods: Eight databases were searched from inception to October 2025. SRs/MAs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupuncture for VD were included. Methodological quality, completeness of reporting, and certainty of evidence were assessed using AMSTAR-2, PRISMA 2020, and GRADE, respectively. Furthermore, a secondary data mining analysis was conducted on primary RCTs to identify meridian and acupoint selection laws. Results: Sixteen SRs/MAs were included. According to AMSTAR-2, only one review was of high quality, while 87.5% were rated low or critically low, primarily due to the lack of protocol registration. GRADE assessment indicated that 97.9% of outcomes were of low or very low certainty, mainly downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision. Most pooled estimates favored acupuncture for cognitive and functional outcomes, but certainty of evidence was predominantly low or very low according to GRADE criteria. A frequency analysis of the 242 unique RCTs identified the Governor Vessel (18.8% of meridian usage) and the acupoints GV20 (Baihui), EX-HN1 (Sishencong), and ST36 (Zusanli) among the most commonly used points; these patterns should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than validated treatment recommendations. Conclusion: Current evidence indicates potential signals of benefit for acupuncture in VD, but findings remain inconclusive owing to prevalent methodological flaws and high heterogeneity in the primary trials. Future research should prioritize rigorous, large-scale, sham-controlled RCTs testing standardized candidate protocols to establish definitive evidence. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251180848 , identifier CRD420251180848.
SN - 1662-453X
SN - 1662-4548
ER -