When an endangered species’ recovery became a social issue: Humpback whale and artisanal fisheries conflict in Brazil
Abstract
This policy review examines the “conservation paradox” of Brazilian humpback whales (Breeding Stock A): while the population recovers at 7–12% annually and returns to historical habitats, it increasingly overlaps with modernized coastal activities, generating severe socio-environmental conflicts with artisanal fisheries. Unlike previous biologically focused assessments, this review frames the paradox as a governance challenge requiring human-centered mitigation strategies. We analyze existing institutional frameworks—Marine Extractive Reserves (RESEX), the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC), and Brazil’s Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) under Decree 12,491/2025—and evaluate their capacity to operationalize Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) and multi-stakeholder co-management. We assess monitoring technologies (telemetry, Passive Acoustic Monitoring, drones, AIS, machine learning, eDNA, UAV thermal imaging) not as general tools but as decision-support instruments for specific management processes, with particular attention to operational feasibility for small-scale fisheries. We identify critical governance gaps—including enforcement limitations, underreporting driven by punitive regulatory cultures, and insufficient integration of LEK into formal planning—and propose six concrete policy recommendations. Addressing this paradox requires interdisciplinary, community-inclusive policies that reconcile marine megafauna recovery with local livelihoods and build trust between fishers, regulators, and conservation practitioners.
Related
- Mapping bycatch risk hotspots for marine megafauna in the Mediterranean: contrasting artisanal and industrial fisheries
- Conflict with industrial fleets undermines the contributions of small-scale fisheries to sustainable development in vulnerable regions.
- Monitoring and assessment of elasmobranch bycatches in artisanal maritime fishing in southern Gabon, Central Africa
- Successful Rescue of a Juvenile Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) Trapped Upstream of the Rance Tidal Power Station, Brittany, France
- A practical approach to assess equity in fisheries management
BibTeX
@article{andriolo2026when,
title = {{When an endangered species’ recovery became a social issue: Humpback whale and artisanal fisheries conflict in Brazil}},
author = {Artur Andriolo},
journal = {Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.pecon.2026.10.001},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2026.10.001},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - When an endangered species’ recovery became a social issue: Humpback whale and artisanal fisheries conflict in Brazil
AU - Artur Andriolo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
DO - 10.1016/j.pecon.2026.10.001
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2026.10.001
AB - This policy review examines the “conservation paradox” of Brazilian humpback whales (Breeding Stock A): while the population recovers at 7–12% annually and returns to historical habitats, it increasingly overlaps with modernized coastal activities, generating severe socio-environmental conflicts with artisanal fisheries. Unlike previous biologically focused assessments, this review frames the paradox as a governance challenge requiring human-centered mitigation strategies. We analyze existing institutional frameworks—Marine Extractive Reserves (RESEX), the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC), and Brazil’s Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) under Decree 12,491/2025—and evaluate their capacity to operationalize Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) and multi-stakeholder co-management. We assess monitoring technologies (telemetry, Passive Acoustic Monitoring, drones, AIS, machine learning, eDNA, UAV thermal imaging) not as general tools but as decision-support instruments for specific management processes, with particular attention to operational feasibility for small-scale fisheries. We identify critical governance gaps—including enforcement limitations, underreporting driven by punitive regulatory cultures, and insufficient integration of LEK into formal planning—and propose six concrete policy recommendations. Addressing this paradox requires interdisciplinary, community-inclusive policies that reconcile marine megafauna recovery with local livelihoods and build trust between fishers, regulators, and conservation practitioners.
SN - 2530-0644
ER -