Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYInternational journal of neonatal screening

Communication of Screen-Positive Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results for Metabolic Conditions in Ireland-Parent and Healthcare Professional Experience: A Service Evaluation.

  1. 1National Healthy Childhood Programme, Health Service Executive (HSE), R35 TY28 Offaly, Ireland.
  2. 2National Newborn Bloodspot Screening Laboratory, Children's Health Ireland (CHI), D01 YC67 Dublin, Ireland.
  3. 3National Centre for Inherited Metabolic Disorders, CHI at Temple Street, D01 XD99 Dublin, Ireland.

Abstract

Communication of screen-positive newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) results is inherently challenging for both parents and HCPs. There is no internationally accepted gold-standard model, with heterogeneity in practice and with many jurisdictions reporting suboptimal parent and HCP experience. This service evaluation aimed to assess the model for communication of initial screen positive results for metabolic conditions through the Irish National Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme (NNBSP). Under the current model, screen-positive results are communicated to parents by a healthcare professional (HCP) (usually over the phone) and follow-up is arranged through the maternity hospital of birth. The evaluation required engagement with three cohorts, comprising two parent cohorts (a True Positive (TP) cohort and a False Positive (FP) cohort) and one HCP cohort. A separate survey was designed for each cohort, informed by a review of the international literature and subject matter expertise. Overall, our evaluation found that the current model for communication of screen-positive results is acceptable to HCPs, the majority of whom regard communicating these results as an appropriate part of their role (61%) and feel confident doing so (68%). However, many parents reported that they did not receive key information, and 70% wanted more information at this first communication. Parents wanted clear, reassuring, and actionable information, including details of the suspected condition, next steps, and where to seek further support. HCPs wanted additional resources to support communication of screen-positive results, including guidelines, expert contacts, condition-specific information resources, and checklists. The findings of this evaluation will inform revisions of the current model, aimed at ensuring a better experience for parents and HCPs.

Related

  1. Advance care planning communication training workshop for professional care workers in Japan : A mixed-method approach
    Hiroko Ohashi, Yoshihisa Hirakawa, Keiko Abe +6
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Patient expectations and healthcare professional education in obesity care: A comparative qualitative study
    Tak Ying Louise Ko, Francisca Contreras, Carel W. Le Roux +1
    Obesity pillarsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Patients’ experience with medical communication about medically unexplained symptoms
    Elise Rambaud, Viet-Thi Tran, Tiphaine Lenfant +1
    Communications MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Communication without dialogue? Framing patient-professional interaction in UK institutional discourse on pregnancy loss
    L. Nuttall, B. Malory
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
  5. Temporal Experience in Addiction and Recovery: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Synthesis of First-Person and Professional Accounts
    Albert Łukasik, Ryan Kemp, Marcin Moskalewicz
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{brackenscally2026communication,
  title = {{Communication of Screen-Positive Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results for Metabolic Conditions in Ireland-Parent and Healthcare Professional Experience: A Service Evaluation.}},
  author = {Mairéad Bracken-Scally and Anna O'Loughlin and Jenny McNulty and Olivia Walsh and Caoimhe Howard and Ahmad Ardeshir Monavari and Abigail Collins and Heather Burns},
  journal = {International journal of neonatal screening},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/ijns12040078},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924755},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Communication of Screen-Positive Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results for Metabolic Conditions in Ireland-Parent and Healthcare Professional Experience: A Service Evaluation.
AU  - Mairéad Bracken-Scally
AU  - Anna O'Loughlin
AU  - Jenny McNulty
AU  - Olivia Walsh
AU  - Caoimhe Howard
AU  - Ahmad Ardeshir Monavari
AU  - Abigail Collins
AU  - Heather Burns
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
JO  - International journal of neonatal screening
DO  - 10.3390/ijns12040078
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924755
AB  - Communication of screen-positive newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) results is inherently challenging for both parents and HCPs. There is no internationally accepted gold-standard model, with heterogeneity in practice and with many jurisdictions reporting suboptimal parent and HCP experience. This service evaluation aimed to assess the model for communication of initial screen positive results for metabolic conditions through the Irish National Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme (NNBSP). Under the current model, screen-positive results are communicated to parents by a healthcare professional (HCP) (usually over the phone) and follow-up is arranged through the maternity hospital of birth. The evaluation required engagement with three cohorts, comprising two parent cohorts (a True Positive (TP) cohort and a False Positive (FP) cohort) and one HCP cohort. A separate survey was designed for each cohort, informed by a review of the international literature and subject matter expertise. Overall, our evaluation found that the current model for communication of screen-positive results is acceptable to HCPs, the majority of whom regard communicating these results as an appropriate part of their role (61%) and feel confident doing so (68%). However, many parents reported that they did not receive key information, and 70% wanted more information at this first communication. Parents wanted clear, reassuring, and actionable information, including details of the suspected condition, next steps, and where to seek further support. HCPs wanted additional resources to support communication of screen-positive results, including guidelines, expert contacts, condition-specific information resources, and checklists. The findings of this evaluation will inform revisions of the current model, aimed at ensuring a better experience for parents and HCPs.
SN  - 2409-515X
ER  -