Exponential improvements in Rado's covering problem
Abstract
Let Bd denote the d-dimensional Euclidean ball of unit radius. What is the largest constant f(Bd) ā [0,1] with the property that every finite collection š of unit balls in ād admits a disjoint sub-collection š® occupying at least a fraction f(Bd) of the volume of š? This problem was first raised by T. Radó in 1928, for axis-parallel squares in the plane; the author was motivated by a classical covering lemma in real analysis due to Vitali. The case of Euclidean balls was first considered by R. Rado in 1949. Until last year the best known estimates on f(Bd) for unit balls where very far apart: (1+εd) 3ād ⤠f(Bd) ⤠2ād, where 0<εd=odā ā(1). Recently, the authors of this note observed that an exponential improvement on the upper bound follows from the Kabatiansky--Levenshtein spherical code bound, while the lower bound was improved by a linear factor by C.~Xie and G.~Ge (see arxiv:2608.09744). The current best estimates for large d are c Ā· d Ā· 3ād ⤠f(Bd) ⤠2.447ād, where c>0 is an absolute constant. Here we offer the first exponential improvement of the lower bound in almost 80 years, which narrows the gap to: 2.910ād ⤠f(Bd) ⤠2.447ād. Our method is constructive and yields a polynomial time algorithm for finding a disjoint sub-collection realizing the estimate. Moreover the same technique gives similar exponentially improved lower bounds for all symmetric convex bodies satisfying a uniform convexity assumption, e.g., āp-balls for all pā (1,ā).
Related
- Fractional illumination and the optimal exponential rate in Hadwiger's covering conjecture
- On asymptotic Lebesgue's universal covering problem
- Curves of constant width and Lebesgue's covering problem
- An Exact Algorithm for the Max-Min Covering Location Blocker Problem
- Closed escape path of smallest diameter in forest: dual formulation of Lebesgue's universal covering problem
BibTeX
@misc{dallara2026exponential,
title = {{Exponential improvements in Rado's covering problem}},
author = {Gian Maria Dall'Ara and Adrian Dumitrescu},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.25288},
eprint = {2609.25288},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25288},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Exponential improvements in Rado's covering problem
AU - Gian Maria Dall'Ara
AU - Adrian Dumitrescu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.25288
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25288
AB - Let B^d denote the d-dimensional Euclidean ball of unit radius. What is the largest constant f(B^d) ā [0,1] with the property that every finite collection š of unit balls in ā^d admits a disjoint sub-collection š® occupying at least a fraction f(B^d) of the volume of š? This problem was first raised by T. Radó in 1928, for axis-parallel squares in the plane; the author was motivated by a classical covering lemma in real analysis due to Vitali. The case of Euclidean balls was first considered by R. Rado in 1949. Until last year the best known estimates on f(B^d) for unit balls where very far apart: (1+ε_d) 3^ād ⤠f(B^d) ⤠2^ād, where 0<ε_d=o_dā ā(1). Recently, the authors of this note observed that an exponential improvement on the upper bound follows from the Kabatiansky--Levenshtein spherical code bound, while the lower bound was improved by a linear factor by C.~Xie and G.~Ge (see arxiv:2608.09744). The current best estimates for large d are c Ā· d Ā· 3^ād ⤠f(B^d) ⤠2.447^ād, where c>0 is an absolute constant. Here we offer the first exponential improvement of the lower bound in almost 80 years, which narrows the gap to: 2.910^ād ⤠f(B^d) ⤠2.447^ād. Our method is constructive and yields a polynomial time algorithm for finding a disjoint sub-collection realizing the estimate. Moreover the same technique gives similar exponentially improved lower bounds for all symmetric convex bodies satisfying a uniform convexity assumption, e.g., ā^p-balls for all pā (1,ā).
ER -