Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Measuring molecular singlet oxygen (1O2*) from atmospheric photosensitizers: Intercomparison of techniques, irradiation setups, data analysis and protocol recommendations

Abstract

Molecular singlet oxygen (1O∗2) is the first ex-cited state of molecular oxygen (O2) and can be formedthrough indirect photochemistry during irradiation of chromophoric organic matter. Once formed in the particle and droplet phases in the atmosphere, 1O∗2 can be a competitive oxidant in the photochemical processing of organic matter. Now, as more researchers study the atmospheric photo-chemistry of 1O∗2, establishing protocols by evaluating and comparing experimental setups across laboratories is becoming necessary. Here, we present 1O∗2 measurements from four photosensitizing molecules in four photoreactor setups at three research institutions, including two xenon lamps of different strengths and two multi-bulb UVA + UVB broad-band systems. The production of 1O∗2 was investigated from perinaphthenone, lignin, and juglone, which are photosensitizers with atmospherically relevant light absorbing moieties, as well as from Rose Bengal, a standard photosensitizer. Two chemical actinometers, 2-nitrobenzaldehyde and p-nitroanisole/pyridine, were used to quantify photon fluxes and calculate rates of light absorbance for photosensitizers for each photoreactor. We compared two commonly used 1O∗2 quantification methods, chemical probe method using furfuryl alcohol, as well as direct 1O∗2 phosphorescence detection at 1270 nm. Rates of light absorbance across ex perimental setups for each photosensitizer ranged between 0.2 and 62 × 10−5 molphotons L−1 s−1, while 1O∗2 steady-state concentrations ranged between 0.01 and 129 × 10−11 M. Despite order of magnitude differences in rate of light ab sorbance and 1O∗2 steady state concentrations, normalizingto 1O∗2 quantum yields showed good inter-laboratory agreement but only for the sensitizers with high quantum yields:perinaphthenone (94 % ± 9 %–112 % ± 17 %) and for Rose Bengal (67 % ± 15 %–87 % ± 5 %). 1O∗2 quantum yields for lignin and juglone increased with decreasing irradiation wavelength, highlighting a wavelength-dependence. Finally,we make five recommendations to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of 1O∗2 measurements for the atmospheric chemistry community. These recommendations include considering wavelength-dependent quantum yields, avoiding suppression of 1O∗2, controlling and reporting photoreactor temperature, considering light scattering from nanoparticles,and conducting control experiments. These recommendations can serve as guidelines to build future photoreactors as well as help standardize 1O∗2 measurements in studying photochemical processing of atmospheric aerosols and droplets.

Related

  1. Responses of Fibroblasts, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, and Macrophages after Irradiation with Proton and Silver Ion Emission Guns under Atmospheric Pressure
    Ryoichiro Okawa, Yusuke Daiko, Akiko Obata +1
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryCrossref
  2. Synthesis and Functional Properties of Fluorinated Phosphonate‐Substituted Porphyrins: Excellent Photosensitizers and Robust Precursors for Photoactive Langmuir–Schaefer Films
    Azhar Kechiche, Cyrille Monnereau, Chantal Andraud +6
    Chemistry - A European JournalPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textMaterials & polymersHAL
  3. Unlocking the Potential of Ommatins as Sustainable Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy
    Arif Hussain, Anthony A. Ruberto, Harsh Bhatia +11
    Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry lettersPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textOrganic chemistryPMC
  4. Unveiling Photoluminescent N-Heterocyclic Silylene-Silver(I) Amides as Dual-Function Photosensitizers and Third-Harmonic Generators
    Moushakhi Ghosh, Abhijit Chatterjee, Prakash Panwaria +7
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersChemRxiv
  5. Quenching Kinetics of Triplet-State Photosensitizers in Environmental Photochemistry.
    Sha Zhu, Keying Fan, Davide Vione +4
    Environmental science & technologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysical chemistryEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{gemmell2026measuring,
  title = {{Measuring molecular singlet oxygen (1O2*) from atmospheric photosensitizers: Intercomparison of techniques, irradiation setups, data analysis and protocol recommendations}},
  author = {K. Gemmell and L. Heinlein and E. Petersen-Sonn and C. Sardena and Z. Guo and N. Marino-Ocampo and B. Heyne and C. George and C. Anastasio and N. Borduas-Dedekind},
  journal = {Atmospheric Measurement Techniques},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.5194/amt-19-3961-2026},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05664574v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Measuring molecular singlet oxygen (1O2*) from atmospheric photosensitizers: Intercomparison of techniques, irradiation setups, data analysis and protocol recommendations
AU  - K. Gemmell
AU  - L. Heinlein
AU  - E. Petersen-Sonn
AU  - C. Sardena
AU  - Z. Guo
AU  - N. Marino-Ocampo
AU  - B. Heyne
AU  - C. George
AU  - C. Anastasio
AU  - N. Borduas-Dedekind
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/17
JO  - Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
DO  - 10.5194/amt-19-3961-2026
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05664574v1
AB  - Molecular singlet oxygen (1O∗2) is the first ex-cited state of molecular oxygen (O2) and can be formedthrough indirect photochemistry during irradiation of chromophoric organic matter. Once formed in the particle and droplet phases in the atmosphere, 1O∗2 can be a competitive oxidant in the photochemical processing of organic matter. Now, as more researchers study the atmospheric photo-chemistry of 1O∗2, establishing protocols by evaluating and comparing experimental setups across laboratories is becoming necessary. Here, we present 1O∗2 measurements from four photosensitizing molecules in four photoreactor setups at three research institutions, including two xenon lamps of different strengths and two multi-bulb UVA + UVB broad-band systems. The production of 1O∗2 was investigated from perinaphthenone, lignin, and juglone, which are photosensitizers with atmospherically relevant light absorbing moieties, as well as from Rose Bengal, a standard photosensitizer. Two chemical actinometers, 2-nitrobenzaldehyde and p-nitroanisole/pyridine, were used to quantify photon fluxes and calculate rates of light absorbance for photosensitizers for each photoreactor. We compared two commonly used 1O∗2 quantification methods, chemical probe method using furfuryl alcohol, as well as direct 1O∗2 phosphorescence detection at 1270 nm. Rates of light absorbance across ex perimental setups for each photosensitizer ranged between 0.2 and 62 × 10−5 molphotons L−1 s−1, while 1O∗2 steady-state concentrations ranged between 0.01 and 129 × 10−11 M. Despite order of magnitude differences in rate of light ab sorbance and 1O∗2 steady state concentrations, normalizingto 1O∗2 quantum yields showed good inter-laboratory agreement but only for the sensitizers with high quantum yields:perinaphthenone (94 % ± 9 %–112 % ± 17 %) and for Rose Bengal (67 % ± 15 %–87 % ± 5 %). 1O∗2 quantum yields for lignin and juglone increased with decreasing irradiation wavelength, highlighting a wavelength-dependence. Finally,we make five recommendations to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of 1O∗2 measurements for the atmospheric chemistry community. These recommendations include considering wavelength-dependent quantum yields, avoiding suppression of 1O∗2, controlling and reporting photoreactor temperature, considering light scattering from nanoparticles,and conducting control experiments. These recommendations can serve as guidelines to build future photoreactors as well as help standardize 1O∗2 measurements in studying photochemical processing of atmospheric aerosols and droplets.
SN  - 1867-1381
SN  - 1867-8548
ER  -