Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of medical radiation sciences

Daytime Idle Energy Reduction in Radiotherapy Simulation Computed Tomography: A Prospective Workflow-Based Evaluation.

  1. 1Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
  2. 2Department of Radiology, Saiseikai Niigata Kenoh Kikan Hospital, Niigata, Japan.

Abstract

Introduction

Previous computed tomography (CT) energy-saving studies have primarily focused on after-hours shutdown or idle energy use in diagnostic CT. Radiotherapy simulation, however, includes preparation and immobilisation steps that may prolong daytime non-acquisition periods. This study quantified daytime energy use in radiotherapy simulation CT and evaluated the contribution of power-saving operation.Methods

In this prospective single-centre study, electrical power consumption was directly measured using a three-phase power logger during five baseline and five power-saving weekdays (08:00-18:00). Power measurements were integrated with patient in-room intervals and simulation procedure categories. Staff perceptions of workflow impact were assessed using an anonymous questionnaire, and carbon implications were estimated from the measured energy reduction.Results

Mean directly measured clinical-hour energy consumption decreased from 38.7 to 36.5 kWh/day with power-saving operation, a 5.8% reduction. Non-acquisition time during patient presence varied markedly by procedure, from 56.5% for respiratory-gated four-dimensional CT to 97.1% for head-and-neck simulation. Power-saving operation shifted daytime power use towards a lower-power state, corresponding to an estimated reduction of 0.84-1.01 kg-CO₂ per clinical day across the emission-factor sensitivity range. Twenty of 21 staff (95.2%) reported no impact on patient throughput.Conclusion

Power-saving operation reduced daytime energy consumption without meaningful workflow disruption. Radiotherapy simulation CT has prolonged, procedure-dependent idle periods arising from radiotherapy-specific preparation workflows, highlighting a practical and previously undercharacterised opportunity for energy reduction.

Related

  1. Prospective evaluation of oxygen saturation endoscopic imaging for radiotherapy response in head and neck cancer
    Kento Tomizawa, Atsushi Motegi, Hidenari Hirata +18
    Communications MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  2. Evaluation of Condylar Space Measurements before and after Prosthetic Rehabilitation in a Defined Cohort using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: A Prospective, Preliminary, Interventional Study
    K. V. Athira, K. Nanda Kumar, R. P. Shanoj +6
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  3. Feasibility and potential benefits of daily online adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer without margin reduction using an RTT-only workflow
    A.M. Lindegaard, K. Håkansson, A. Appelt +7
    Clinical and translational radiation oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Clavicular tunnel position is associated with reduction loss after arthroscopic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a computed tomography–based analysis
    Kenta Inagaki, Nobuyasu Ochiai, Yasuhito Sasaki +2
    JSES reviews, reports, and techniquesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. Left ventricular function and volumes from cardiac magnetic resonance and gated [13N]-ammonia positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries: a prospective head-to-head comparison using hybrid positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance
    Runze Wen, Qiang Xie, Ming Ni +5
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{hirotaki2026daytime,
  title = {{Daytime Idle Energy Reduction in Radiotherapy Simulation Computed Tomography: A Prospective Workflow-Based Evaluation.}},
  author = {Kouta Hirotaki and Yoshiaki Honda and Masashi Ito},
  journal = {Journal of medical radiation sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1002/jmrs.70133},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42969022},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Daytime Idle Energy Reduction in Radiotherapy Simulation Computed Tomography: A Prospective Workflow-Based Evaluation.
AU  - Kouta Hirotaki
AU  - Yoshiaki Honda
AU  - Masashi Ito
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - Journal of medical radiation sciences
DO  - 10.1002/jmrs.70133
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42969022
AB  - Introduction  Previous computed tomography (CT) energy-saving studies have primarily focused on after-hours shutdown or idle energy use in diagnostic CT. Radiotherapy simulation, however, includes preparation and immobilisation steps that may prolong daytime non-acquisition periods. This study quantified daytime energy use in radiotherapy simulation CT and evaluated the contribution of power-saving operation.Methods  In this prospective single-centre study, electrical power consumption was directly measured using a three-phase power logger during five baseline and five power-saving weekdays (08:00-18:00). Power measurements were integrated with patient in-room intervals and simulation procedure categories. Staff perceptions of workflow impact were assessed using an anonymous questionnaire, and carbon implications were estimated from the measured energy reduction.Results  Mean directly measured clinical-hour energy consumption decreased from 38.7 to 36.5 kWh/day with power-saving operation, a 5.8% reduction. Non-acquisition time during patient presence varied markedly by procedure, from 56.5% for respiratory-gated four-dimensional CT to 97.1% for head-and-neck simulation. Power-saving operation shifted daytime power use towards a lower-power state, corresponding to an estimated reduction of 0.84-1.01 kg-CO₂ per clinical day across the emission-factor sensitivity range. Twenty of 21 staff (95.2%) reported no impact on patient throughput.Conclusion  Power-saving operation reduced daytime energy consumption without meaningful workflow disruption. Radiotherapy simulation CT has prolonged, procedure-dependent idle periods arising from radiotherapy-specific preparation workflows, highlighting a practical and previously undercharacterised opportunity for energy reduction.
SN  - 2051-3895
SN  - 2051-3909
ER  -