Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,544 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Observer-Based Model Predictive Control for Isoflux Regulation in the EXL-50U Spherical Tokamak

Abstract

Isoflux control in spherical tokamaks requires coordinated plasma-current and boundary regulation under coil-voltage and computational constraints. This study develops observer-based constrained model predictive control (MPC) for EXL-50U. Vacuum-vessel spatial coarsening reduces a 538-state linearized model to 40 states while retaining control-relevant responses. A Kalman observer provides full-state estimates, and MPC jointly optimizes current and boundary-flux tracking with explicit voltage bounds. Matrix precomputation, specialized solver code generation, and structured linear-system solution reduce online computation. Nonlinear free-boundary Grad--Shafranov evolutive simulations evaluate nominal operation, measurement noise, configuration mismatch, a one-step delay, and combined noise and delay against proportional--integral--derivative (PID) control and a linear--quadratic regulator (LQR). Nominal MPC root-mean-square errors are 1.126 kA for plasma current, 0.0164 m for last-closed-flux-surface geometry, and 2.463 mWb for the worst flux channel, all below both baselines. With noise, the boundary error is 0.0199 m over the common evaluation window, and regulation is sustained throughout the test. MPC completes a limiter-to-divertor transition without relinearization or retuning and maintains regulation under delay and combined disturbances. Across all five cases, mean MPC computation times are 0.413--0.441 ms, with all 99th percentiles below 1 ms. These results support joint current and isoflux regulation and millisecond-scale computational feasibility, providing a basis for future EXL-50U experiments.

Related

  1. Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Forced Convection Past an Isoflux Circular Cylinder in Galinstan for Reynolds Numbers up to 600
    Dipjyoti Nath
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingFluid dynamicsarXiv
  2. Model predictive quantum control: a modular approach for efficient and robust quantum optimal control
    Eya Guizani, Julian Berberich
    New Journal of PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsIOP/AASCrossref
  3. Predictive electronic feedback control for narrow-linewidth lasers
    Jiatian Liu, Xuan Qi, Xiayang Fan +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsOptics & photonicsarXiv
  4. The Source of Disturbance Matters: External, Internal, and Control-Generated Noise in Adaptive Regulation
    Veronique Ziegler
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  5. Improved model predictive current control strategy for overvoltage suppression in long-cable PWM-driven induction motor electrical submersible pump systems
    Xiaopeng Gong, Xin Qi, Ming Feng +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersAlgebra & number theoryPLOSEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@misc{lu2026observerbased,
  title = {{Observer-Based Model Predictive Control for Isoflux Regulation in the EXL-50U Spherical Tokamak}},
  author = {Chang Lu and Jiayi Zhi and Xian Guo and Tianyuan Liu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.34076},
  eprint = {2609.34076},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34076},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Observer-Based Model Predictive Control for Isoflux Regulation in the EXL-50U Spherical Tokamak
AU  - Chang Lu
AU  - Jiayi Zhi
AU  - Xian Guo
AU  - Tianyuan Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.34076
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34076
AB  - Isoflux control in spherical tokamaks requires coordinated plasma-current and boundary regulation under coil-voltage and computational constraints. This study develops observer-based constrained model predictive control (MPC) for EXL-50U. Vacuum-vessel spatial coarsening reduces a 538-state linearized model to 40 states while retaining control-relevant responses. A Kalman observer provides full-state estimates, and MPC jointly optimizes current and boundary-flux tracking with explicit voltage bounds. Matrix precomputation, specialized solver code generation, and structured linear-system solution reduce online computation. Nonlinear free-boundary Grad--Shafranov evolutive simulations evaluate nominal operation, measurement noise, configuration mismatch, a one-step delay, and combined noise and delay against proportional--integral--derivative (PID) control and a linear--quadratic regulator (LQR). Nominal MPC root-mean-square errors are 1.126 kA for plasma current, 0.0164 m for last-closed-flux-surface geometry, and 2.463 mWb for the worst flux channel, all below both baselines. With noise, the boundary error is 0.0199 m over the common evaluation window, and regulation is sustained throughout the test. MPC completes a limiter-to-divertor transition without relinearization or retuning and maintains regulation under delay and combined disturbances. Across all five cases, mean MPC computation times are 0.413--0.441 ms, with all 99th percentiles below 1 ms. These results support joint current and isoflux regulation and millisecond-scale computational feasibility, providing a basis for future EXL-50U experiments.
ER  -