Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology

Sex and Age Differences in Electrocardiographic Parameters Among Adults With Normal ECGs at a Single Diagnostic Centre in Owerri, Nigeria: A Retrospective Cross‐Sectional Study

7 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences Federal University of Technology Owerri Nigeria
  2. 2Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences University of Port Harcourt Choba Rivers State Nigeria
  3. 3College of Medicine, Imo State University Owerri Imo State Nigeria
  4. 4Department of Internal Medicine St. Mary's Hospital, Lacor Gulu Uganda
  5. 5Department of Internal Medicine Kabale University School of Medicine Kabale Uganda
  6. 6School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences Makerere University Kampala Uganda
  7. 7Faculty of Medicine Gulu University Gulu Uganda

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiographic (ECG) reference values used in Nigerian diagnostic centres are derived from European and North American cohorts, and age‐ and sex‐stratified Nigerian data are scarce.

Methods: In this retrospective cross‐sectional study, 313 12‐lead ECGs reported as normal by a cardiologist at a diagnostic centre in Owerri, Nigeria, were grouped by age (18–40 years, n = 164; ≥ 60 years, n = 149) and sex. Heart rate, P‐wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration and machine‐reported QTc were compared using t‐tests or Mann–Whitney U tests and two‐way ANOVA, with Bonferroni correction. Sensitivity analyses applied conventional limits uniformly.

Results: Heart rate, P‐wave duration, PR interval and QRS duration did not differ between age groups (all p > 0.09). QTc was longer in older adults (433.7 ± 17.4 vs. 427.4 ± 18.3 ms; p = 0.008), also after heart‐rate adjustment (8.3 ms; 95% CI 4.8 to 11.8). Females had longer QTc than males in both age groups (by 14.6 and 11.6 ms; both p < 0.001) in all analyses. Males had wider QRS than females only in younger adults (95.7 vs. 89.5 ms; p < 0.001), but this age‐by‐sex interaction (p = 0.007) was not significant when limits were applied uniformly (p = 0.076). PR stopped at 200 ms in both age groups, consistent with selection.

Conclusion: The female‐longer QTc was the most consistent finding, and older adults had modestly longer QTc. Age‐related conduction differences may have been masked by selection; unselected multicentre data are needed before reference intervals are adopted.

Related

  1. Heart rate variability and electrocardiographic parameters among workers exposed to chronic intermittent hypobaric hypoxia in the Peruvian Andes: A cross-sectional study Cardiac autonomic function in Andean workers
    E. S. Montes-Madariaga, J. B. Ortiz-Saavedra, J. S. Mamani Castillo +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicinemedRxiv
  2. Diagnostic utility of body fat distribution parameters in distinguishing osteosarcopenia from osteoporosis or sarcopenia alone in postmenopausal women: a retrospective cross-sectional study
    Jiacong Hong, Bailing Chen, Haonan Li +3
    Aging Clinical and Experimental ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedPhysiologyPMC
  3. Sex and disease differences in patients’ diagnostic experiences in autoimmune diseases: an international cross-sectional study
    Melanie Sloan, Sydnae Taylor, Benjamin Cox +8
    eClinicalMedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Electrocardiographic Ventricular Repolarisation Parameters in Morbidly Obese Individuals
    İlker Kızmaz, Erdinç Yaman, Gizem Nur Sözen +4
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Factors influencing baseline electrocardiographic parameters in rats: A systematic review of experimental studies published from 1960 to the present
    Viktória Novotná, Soňa Grešová, Pavol Švorc
    Physiological reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{egharevba2026differences,
  title = {{Sex and Age Differences in Electrocardiographic Parameters Among Adults With Normal ECGs at a Single Diagnostic Centre in Owerri, Nigeria: A Retrospective Cross‐Sectional Study}},
  author = {Jovita Eghe Egharevba and Clinton Nwanaga Uche and Chosen Nwaeze Egwim and Acomo Grace and Gerald Olwit and Ivaan Pitua and James Nelson Okema},
  journal = {Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1111/anec.70257},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.70257},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sex and Age Differences in Electrocardiographic Parameters Among Adults With Normal ECGs at a Single Diagnostic Centre in Owerri, Nigeria: A Retrospective Cross‐Sectional Study
AU  - Jovita Eghe Egharevba
AU  - Clinton Nwanaga Uche
AU  - Chosen Nwaeze Egwim
AU  - Acomo Grace
AU  - Gerald Olwit
AU  - Ivaan Pitua
AU  - James Nelson Okema
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
DO  - 10.1111/anec.70257
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.70257
AB  - Background: Electrocardiographic (ECG) reference values used in Nigerian diagnostic centres are derived from European and North American cohorts, and age‐ and sex‐stratified Nigerian data are scarce.  Methods: In this retrospective cross‐sectional study, 313 12‐lead ECGs reported as normal by a cardiologist at a diagnostic centre in Owerri, Nigeria, were grouped by age (18–40 years, n = 164; ≥ 60 years, n = 149) and sex. Heart rate, P‐wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration and machine‐reported QTc were compared using t‐tests or Mann–Whitney U tests and two‐way ANOVA, with Bonferroni correction. Sensitivity analyses applied conventional limits uniformly.  Results: Heart rate, P‐wave duration, PR interval and QRS duration did not differ between age groups (all p > 0.09). QTc was longer in older adults (433.7 ± 17.4 vs. 427.4 ± 18.3 ms; p = 0.008), also after heart‐rate adjustment (8.3 ms; 95% CI 4.8 to 11.8). Females had longer QTc than males in both age groups (by 14.6 and 11.6 ms; both p < 0.001) in all analyses. Males had wider QRS than females only in younger adults (95.7 vs. 89.5 ms; p < 0.001), but this age‐by‐sex interaction (p = 0.007) was not significant when limits were applied uniformly (p = 0.076). PR stopped at 200 ms in both age groups, consistent with selection.  Conclusion: The female‐longer QTc was the most consistent finding, and older adults had modestly longer QTc. Age‐related conduction differences may have been masked by selection; unselected multicentre data are needed before reference intervals are adopted.
SN  - 1082-720X
SN  - 1542-474X
ER  -