Assessing Botanical Authenticity of Honey Through DNA-Metabarcoding-Based Pollen Analysis: A Preliminary Study.
- 1Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Prov. le Casamassima 62, km 3, 70010 Valenzano (Bari), Italy.
- 2Marine Organism Taxonomy Core Facility (MOTax), Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, 80121 Naples, Italy.
- 3Laboratory of Palynology and Palaeobotany, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Abstract
Honey is highly vulnerable to botanical mislabeling and fraud, highlighting the need for dedicated analytical approaches capable of reliably supporting authenticity assessment. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to integrate traditional melissopalynology and rbcL DNA metabarcoding for the botanical characterization of honeys collected from Apulian beekeepers. Melissopalynological analysis confirmed the labeled floral source in 6/10 (60%) samples, while four samples were reclassified. One cherry honey was identified as polyfloral, and one robinia (acacia) honey as crimson clover honey. The two samples labeled as polyfloral showed a predominance of chestnut and coriander pollen. In contrast, molecular results confirmed label declarations for chestnut and cherry honeys, whereas robinia (acacia) honeys highlighted known limitations associated with under-represented pollen taxa. In terms of biodiversity, DNA metabarcoding identified 128 plant families, whereas melissopalynology detected only 42. Despite this difference in taxonomic resolution, both approaches converged on the core botanical composition of the honey matrix, sharing 39 plant families that represent the principal nectariferous and entomophilous taxa. Overall, melissopalynology proved decisive for regulatory label verification, while DNA metabarcoding provided a broader qualitative description of the botanical composition. As a preliminary pilot study, the combined application of melissopalynology and DNA metabarcoding may contribute to a more comprehensive assessment of honey botanical origin and traceability; however, molecular detection alone cannot be considered sufficient to establish compliance with legal requirements for unifloral honey labeling.
Related
- Wild Nepeta sibirica L. from Eastern Kazakhstan: Botanical Characterization, Essential-Oil Composition, Chemogeographic Context, and Preliminary Bioactivity
- From deployment to functioning ecosystems: assessing taxonomic richness and community composition on modular shellfish reefs using environmental DNA metabarcoding
- Assessing fish biodiversity and community structure in the Ganjiang River using eDNA metabarcoding
- Assessing affective states in domestic dogs through judgment bias tasks: a systematic review of methods, influencing factors, and welfare applications.
- Assessing the reliability of hippocampal single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy through intra-class effect decomposition
BibTeX
@article{ranieri2026assessing,
title = {{Assessing Botanical Authenticity of Honey Through DNA-Metabarcoding-Based Pollen Analysis: A Preliminary Study.}},
author = {Lucia Ranieri and Roberta Piredda and Anna Mottola and Chiara Intermite and Martina Denami and Lucilia Lorusso and Angela Di Pinto},
journal = {Foods (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/foods15193542},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42883649},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Assessing Botanical Authenticity of Honey Through DNA-Metabarcoding-Based Pollen Analysis: A Preliminary Study.
AU - Lucia Ranieri
AU - Roberta Piredda
AU - Anna Mottola
AU - Chiara Intermite
AU - Martina Denami
AU - Lucilia Lorusso
AU - Angela Di Pinto
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/04
JO - Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/foods15193542
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42883649
AB - Honey is highly vulnerable to botanical mislabeling and fraud, highlighting the need for dedicated analytical approaches capable of reliably supporting authenticity assessment. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to integrate traditional melissopalynology and rbcL DNA metabarcoding for the botanical characterization of honeys collected from Apulian beekeepers. Melissopalynological analysis confirmed the labeled floral source in 6/10 (60%) samples, while four samples were reclassified. One cherry honey was identified as polyfloral, and one robinia (acacia) honey as crimson clover honey. The two samples labeled as polyfloral showed a predominance of chestnut and coriander pollen. In contrast, molecular results confirmed label declarations for chestnut and cherry honeys, whereas robinia (acacia) honeys highlighted known limitations associated with under-represented pollen taxa. In terms of biodiversity, DNA metabarcoding identified 128 plant families, whereas melissopalynology detected only 42. Despite this difference in taxonomic resolution, both approaches converged on the core botanical composition of the honey matrix, sharing 39 plant families that represent the principal nectariferous and entomophilous taxa. Overall, melissopalynology proved decisive for regulatory label verification, while DNA metabarcoding provided a broader qualitative description of the botanical composition. As a preliminary pilot study, the combined application of melissopalynology and DNA metabarcoding may contribute to a more comprehensive assessment of honey botanical origin and traceability; however, molecular detection alone cannot be considered sufficient to establish compliance with legal requirements for unifloral honey labeling.
SN - 2304-8158
ER -