Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
PreprintCC0arXiv

When Does Interference Help Learning? Kernel Geometry as a Pre-Experimental Test for Photonic Reservoir Computing

Abstract

Multi-photon interference is the resource most native to photonic quantum machine learning, yet experiments on photonic reservoirs have reported advantages, null results, and train-only effects. These outcomes cannot be compared: each measures task-dependent accuracy on different tasks and platforms. Here we resolve the question task-independently through the kernel geometry of boson-sampling feature maps. Interference redistributes feature variance across roughly twice as many effective dimensions as distinguishable-particle statistics, generating a large geometric separation between the corresponding kernels. The separation grows superlinearly with indistinguishability, is linear in Hong--Ou--Mandel visibility at small visibility for two to four photons, and retains approximately 80% of its magnitude at the source quality of current quantum processors. Under experimental sampling budgets the separation is learnable on adversarially constructed tasks (accuracy advantage +0.22 plus or minus 0.05) and an order of magnitude smaller on natural tasks, gated by kernel--task alignment. The results reconcile the existing experimental record and supply a pre-experimental protocol: kernel geometry establishes that an interference-specific learning resource exists, and task alignment determines whether a given task can access it; both are computable before committing significant hardware resources.

Related

  1. Basin Geometry and Reliable Recall of Dynamical Memories in Reservoir Computing
    Ling-Wei Kong, Ying-Cheng Lai
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. Learning Temporal Patterns in Financial Time Series: A Comparative Study of Quantum LSTM and Quantum Reservoir Computing
    Danyal Maheshwari, Gerhard Hellstern, Martin Zaefferer +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Reservoir computing generalized: Exploiting complex dynamics via time-invariant transformation
    Tomoyuki Kubota, Sumito Tsunegi, Kohei Nakajima
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedPublisher termsAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  4. Nonlinear pluggable optics: Digital signal processing-free Intensity Modulated Direct Detection links using analog photonic Next Generation Reservoir Computing
    Nicholas Cox, Joseph Murray, Ross Schermer +6
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedLicence not statedOptics & photonicsCrossref
  5. Dual-unitary Circuits as a Platform for Quantum Reservoir Computing
    Gabriel O. Alves, Pieter W. Claeys
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kar2026when,
  title = {{When Does Interference Help Learning? Kernel Geometry as a Pre-Experimental Test for Photonic Reservoir Computing}},
  author = {Oishik Kar and Aswath Babu H},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.11360},
  eprint = {2610.11360},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11360},
  note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - When Does Interference Help Learning? Kernel Geometry as a Pre-Experimental Test for Photonic Reservoir Computing
AU  - Oishik Kar
AU  - Aswath Babu H
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.11360
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11360
AB  - Multi-photon interference is the resource most native to photonic quantum machine learning, yet experiments on photonic reservoirs have reported advantages, null results, and train-only effects. These outcomes cannot be compared: each measures task-dependent accuracy on different tasks and platforms. Here we resolve the question task-independently through the kernel geometry of boson-sampling feature maps. Interference redistributes feature variance across roughly twice as many effective dimensions as distinguishable-particle statistics, generating a large geometric separation between the corresponding kernels. The separation grows superlinearly with indistinguishability, is linear in Hong--Ou--Mandel visibility at small visibility for two to four photons, and retains approximately 80% of its magnitude at the source quality of current quantum processors. Under experimental sampling budgets the separation is learnable on adversarially constructed tasks (accuracy advantage +0.22 plus or minus 0.05) and an order of magnitude smaller on natural tasks, gated by kernel--task alignment. The results reconcile the existing experimental record and supply a pre-experimental protocol: kernel geometry establishes that an interference-specific learning resource exists, and task alignment determines whether a given task can access it; both are computable before committing significant hardware resources.
ER  -