Preseason Deceleration Index Is Lower in Collegiate Football Athletes Who Sustain Time-Loss Lower-Quarter Injuries: A Three-Season Prospective Cohort Study
5 affiliations
- 1School of Physical Therapy Belmont University.
- 2University of Georgia Athletics Department.
- 3Department of Physical Therapy Wichita State University.
- 4Franciscan University Doctor of Physical Therapy Program.
- 5Jacksonville Jaguars Football Club.
Abstract
Background
Deceleration capacity is a fundamental yet underappreciated component of multidirectional sport performance. Non-contact lower-quarter injuries frequently occur during rapid deceleration and change-of-direction tasks, yet braking capacity remains under-evaluated relative to acceleration and speed. The Deceleration Index (DI) has been proposed as a ratio-based metric of peak deceleration to peak acceleration. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare preseason Deceleration Index values between collegiate football athletes who sustained a time-loss lower-quarter injury and position-matched uninjured athletes across three competitive seasons. It was hypothesized that football athletes who sustain a non-contact time-loss lower-quarter injury would demonstrate lower preseason DI values than position-matched uninjured athletes.Study design
Prospective cohort study.Methods
Division I male collegiate football athletes completed preseason change-of-direction testing (5-10-5 test) during summer training camp at the beginning of each season. Following a warmup, data were captured using a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) integrated with an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU). The DI was calculated as peak deceleration value divided by peak acceleration value. Athletes were prospectively followed three consecutive seasons for time-loss lower-quarter injuries. Injured athletes (n = 57) were matched 1:1 by playing position to uninjured controls (n = 57). Independent-samples t-tests compared group means, with Cohen's d for effect size. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed within-sample discriminatory ability.Results
Injured and uninjured athletes were similar at baseline in age (mean 22 years in each group), height, body mass, and BMI (all p ≥ 0.09). Injured athletes demonstrated significantly lower preseason DI than uninjured athletes (0.90 ± 0.07 vs 1.10 ± 0.10; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 2.30). ROC analysis showed excellent within-sample discrimination (AUC = 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-0.99); a DI ≤ 1.00 yielded a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 91%.Conclusion
Lower preseason DI values were associated with subsequent non-contact time-loss lower-quarter injury in collegiate football athletes. DI may serve as a practical field-based risk indicator reflecting braking capacity relative to acceleration; causal inference and the proposed threshold require independent validation.Level of evidence
2b (individual prospective cohort study).
Related
- Biomechanical and movement-quality predictors of lower-limb load-related injury in collegiate athletes: a prospective cohort study using functional movement screening, wearable inertial sensing, and explainable machine learning
- Does Preseason Training Load Shape Body Composition? External Load, Internal Load, and Fatigue in Semi-Professional Football Players.
- Comparison of lower extremity peak muscle forces and force-generating capacities during the functional side hop test in male collegiate football players with and without chronic ankle instability
- Evaluation of a Wearable Hydration Monitor for Estimating Sweat Loss and Hydration Status in Collegiate Athletes: A Pilot Study
- Comparing Match-Related Physical Performance Using Arbitrary and Individual Running Speed, Acceleration, and Deceleration Zones in Professional Football Players (Part 1)
BibTeX
@article{voight2026preseason,
title = {{Preseason Deceleration Index Is Lower in Collegiate Football Athletes Who Sustain Time-Loss Lower-Quarter Injuries: A Three-Season Prospective Cohort Study}},
author = {Michael L Voight and Connor Norman and Matt Lucas and Chris Wolfe and Robert C Manske and Phil Page and Pete Draovitch},
journal = {International journal of sports physical therapy},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.26603/001c.172650},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13727008},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Preseason Deceleration Index Is Lower in Collegiate Football Athletes Who Sustain Time-Loss Lower-Quarter Injuries: A Three-Season Prospective Cohort Study
AU - Michael L Voight
AU - Connor Norman
AU - Matt Lucas
AU - Chris Wolfe
AU - Robert C Manske
AU - Phil Page
AU - Pete Draovitch
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/01
JO - International journal of sports physical therapy
DO - 10.26603/001c.172650
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13727008
AB - Background Deceleration capacity is a fundamental yet underappreciated component of multidirectional sport performance. Non-contact lower-quarter injuries frequently occur during rapid deceleration and change-of-direction tasks, yet braking capacity remains under-evaluated relative to acceleration and speed. The Deceleration Index (DI) has been proposed as a ratio-based metric of peak deceleration to peak acceleration. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare preseason Deceleration Index values between collegiate football athletes who sustained a time-loss lower-quarter injury and position-matched uninjured athletes across three competitive seasons. It was hypothesized that football athletes who sustain a non-contact time-loss lower-quarter injury would demonstrate lower preseason DI values than position-matched uninjured athletes.Study design Prospective cohort study.Methods Division I male collegiate football athletes completed preseason change-of-direction testing (5-10-5 test) during summer training camp at the beginning of each season. Following a warmup, data were captured using a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) integrated with an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU). The DI was calculated as peak deceleration value divided by peak acceleration value. Athletes were prospectively followed three consecutive seasons for time-loss lower-quarter injuries. Injured athletes (n = 57) were matched 1:1 by playing position to uninjured controls (n = 57). Independent-samples t-tests compared group means, with Cohen's d for effect size. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed within-sample discriminatory ability.Results Injured and uninjured athletes were similar at baseline in age (mean 22 years in each group), height, body mass, and BMI (all p ≥ 0.09). Injured athletes demonstrated significantly lower preseason DI than uninjured athletes (0.90 ± 0.07 vs 1.10 ± 0.10; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 2.30). ROC analysis showed excellent within-sample discrimination (AUC = 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-0.99); a DI ≤ 1.00 yielded a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 91%.Conclusion Lower preseason DI values were associated with subsequent non-contact time-loss lower-quarter injury in collegiate football athletes. DI may serve as a practical field-based risk indicator reflecting braking capacity relative to acceleration; causal inference and the proposed threshold require independent validation.Level of evidence 2b (individual prospective cohort study).
SN - 2159-2896
ER -