Structural Stigma and Overdose Vulnerability Among Sexual and Gender Minorities
Abstract
Background: Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) experience elevated rates of opioid use and overdose, yet mechanisms driving SGM overdose vulnerability remain underexamined. Utilizing a syndemics framework, this study explores how psychosocial stress and structural stigma co-occur to shape overdose vulnerability among SGM individuals who use opioids.
Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from U.S.-based SGM adults reporting past-year illicit opioid use (N = 331) via Prolific-Academic. Latent profile analysis identified patterns of traumatic stress, internalized stigma, heterosexist discrimination, and state-level structural stigma. Multinomial logistic regression examined sociodemographic predictors of profile membership. BCH procedures assessed between-profile differences in overdose-related outcomes.
Results: A four-profile solution emerged (entropy=0.924): (1) low stress/low structural stigma (n=99), (2) low stress/high structural stigma (n=157), (3) high stress/low structural stigma (n=40), and (4) high stress/high structural stigma (n=35). Higher psychosocial stress (Profiles 3, 4) was associated with greater harm reduction engagement (e.g., naloxone possession, overdose response training; p<.01); lower-stress profiles (1, 2) showed higher overdose response knowledge/self-efficacy. Profile 4 exhibited higher overdose risk than Profile 3, including greater lifetime overdose frequency, heroin use severity (p<.01), and injection drug use (p<.001). Profile 4 was also associated with structural vulnerability, including food insecurity (OR = 3.91, 95% CI [2.23–6.84], p<.001), and racialized identity (OR > 50, p<.001).
Conclusions: Findings highlight a distinct pattern of overdose vulnerability in which structural stigma is associated with higher overdose risk independent of psychosocial stress and harm reduction knowledge/behaviors. Thus, structural stigma may function as an upstream determinant of SGM overdose vulnerability beyond individual-level processes.
Related
- When inequality looms large: the cumulative impacts of discrimination on sexual minorities’ late life experiences
- Nonaffirmation as minority stress among Swiss sexual minorities
- The Link Between Opioid Misuse and Suicidal Ideation Is Strongest Among Sexual Minorities
- Occupational burnout in the UK film and television industry: A cross-sectional survey of mental health, job quality, perceived stigma, and sexual harassment
- Mental health, HIV and healthcare-related discrimination among young sexual minority men in Kenya: implications for integrated care and stigma reduction
BibTeX
@article{mcconocha2026structural,
title = {{Structural Stigma and Overdose Vulnerability Among Sexual and Gender Minorities}},
author = {E McConocha and P Granzka},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.730},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.730},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Structural Stigma and Overdose Vulnerability Among Sexual and Gender Minorities
AU - E McConocha
AU - P Granzka
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.730
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.730
AB - Background: Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) experience elevated rates of opioid use and overdose, yet mechanisms driving SGM overdose vulnerability remain underexamined. Utilizing a syndemics framework, this study explores how psychosocial stress and structural stigma co-occur to shape overdose vulnerability among SGM individuals who use opioids. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from U.S.-based SGM adults reporting past-year illicit opioid use (N = 331) via Prolific-Academic. Latent profile analysis identified patterns of traumatic stress, internalized stigma, heterosexist discrimination, and state-level structural stigma. Multinomial logistic regression examined sociodemographic predictors of profile membership. BCH procedures assessed between-profile differences in overdose-related outcomes. Results: A four-profile solution emerged (entropy=0.924): (1) low stress/low structural stigma (n=99), (2) low stress/high structural stigma (n=157), (3) high stress/low structural stigma (n=40), and (4) high stress/high structural stigma (n=35). Higher psychosocial stress (Profiles 3, 4) was associated with greater harm reduction engagement (e.g., naloxone possession, overdose response training; p<.01); lower-stress profiles (1, 2) showed higher overdose response knowledge/self-efficacy. Profile 4 exhibited higher overdose risk than Profile 3, including greater lifetime overdose frequency, heroin use severity (p<.01), and injection drug use (p<.001). Profile 4 was also associated with structural vulnerability, including food insecurity (OR = 3.91, 95% CI [2.23–6.84], p<.001), and racialized identity (OR > 50, p<.001). Conclusions: Findings highlight a distinct pattern of overdose vulnerability in which structural stigma is associated with higher overdose risk independent of psychosocial stress and harm reduction knowledge/behaviors. Thus, structural stigma may function as an upstream determinant of SGM overdose vulnerability beyond individual-level processes.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -