Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Quantum-Classical Hybrid Methods for Optimization: Lessons from Classical Decomposition

Abstract

Quantum and physics-inspired solvers provide specialized sampling interfaces for Ising and quadratic unconstrained binary optimization models, but constrained optimization requires broader coordination and certification. This survey uses classical decomposition to analyze how such solvers can be integrated into hybrid quantum-classical algorithms. We distinguish formal decomposition, reformulation and reduction, and computational orchestration. For each interface, we ask what the transformation preserves, which assumptions make the outer method converge, and which certificates the implemented inner routine supplies. The central questions are whether that information meets the classical algorithm's requirements and whether hybridization improves solution quality or total cost enough to justify its coordination overhead. Benders decomposition, column generation, graph reduction, and copositive methods illustrate this distinction by separating heuristic proposals from classical certification. We also distinguish component effects within a fixed wrapper, reduction--solver interactions, and comparisons between complete quantum-enabled and classical systems. The analyzed studies provide conditional component benefits and favorable co-design evidence, but do not establish transferable end-to-end superiority over strong classical comparators. The resulting framework identifies opportunities for constraint programming and operations research in structure-preserving design, safeguarded hybrid algorithms, and controlled benchmarking.

Related

  1. A Quantum-Classical Benders Decomposition for Cargo Routing with Time Windows
    Oliver Szal, Joshua Dibbern, Henri Hiep +2
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  2. Quantum estimates for classical polynomial optimization
    Oleg Evnin
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsMathematical physicsarXiv
  3. On the Application of Hybrid Mixed Domain Decomposition Methods to Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines
    Timon Seibel, Sebastian Schöps, Kersten Schmidt
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  4. Computational study of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition methods for parametric approximations
    Bosco García-Archilla, Alicia García-Mascaraque, Julia Novo
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. pqSEDMD: Subspace Methods for Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition Identification
    Camilo Garcia-Tenorio, Alan Vande Wouwer
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{neira2026quantumclassical,
  title = {{Quantum-Classical Hybrid Methods for Optimization: Lessons from Classical Decomposition}},
  author = {David E. Bernal Neira},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.27362},
  eprint = {2610.27362},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27362},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantum-Classical Hybrid Methods for Optimization: Lessons from Classical Decomposition
AU  - David E. Bernal Neira
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.27362
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27362
AB  - Quantum and physics-inspired solvers provide specialized sampling interfaces for Ising and quadratic unconstrained binary optimization models, but constrained optimization requires broader coordination and certification. This survey uses classical decomposition to analyze how such solvers can be integrated into hybrid quantum-classical algorithms. We distinguish formal decomposition, reformulation and reduction, and computational orchestration. For each interface, we ask what the transformation preserves, which assumptions make the outer method converge, and which certificates the implemented inner routine supplies. The central questions are whether that information meets the classical algorithm's requirements and whether hybridization improves solution quality or total cost enough to justify its coordination overhead. Benders decomposition, column generation, graph reduction, and copositive methods illustrate this distinction by separating heuristic proposals from classical certification. We also distinguish component effects within a fixed wrapper, reduction--solver interactions, and comparisons between complete quantum-enabled and classical systems. The analyzed studies provide conditional component benefits and favorable co-design evidence, but do not establish transferable end-to-end superiority over strong classical comparators. The resulting framework identifies opportunities for constraint programming and operations research in structure-preserving design, safeguarded hybrid algorithms, and controlled benchmarking.
ER  -