Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Optimal Ground-State Preparation with a Guiding State

Abstract

Suppose a Hamiltonian H has a unique ground state |ψ0⟩ with an eigenvalue E0, and we have an estimate Ẽ0 such that |Ẽ0−E0|≤δ, and there is a gap of at least 3δ between E0 and all other eigenvalues. Suppose we have a unitary A available that can produce a "guiding state'" A|0⟩ that has overlap at least γ with |ψ0⟩. We show how to obtain an η-approximation of |ψ0⟩ with probability at least 1−ε using O(log(1/ε)/γδ+ log(1/η)/δ) applications of U=eiH its inverse, and O(log(1/ε)/γ) applications of A and its inverse. We give two different algorithms, one based on interleaving amplitude amplification and error-reduction in the style of [HMdW03], and one using the composition of transducers. This paper is the state-preparation follow-up to our two recent ground-state-energy estimation papers [JW26,SdW26]. Combined with the optimal energy-estimation of [JW26], our results show the claimed upper bound for ground-state preparation. The bound is optimal up to a constant factor in terms of the number of applications of U and U† if ε=η, as follows from [SdW26]. In one of our approaches to ground state preparation, we construct transducers for amplitude amplification and LCU that might be of independent interest.

Related

  1. Optimal Lower Bound for Ground-State Energy Estimation with a Guiding State
    Rolando D. Somma, Ronald de Wolf
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Near-Optimal Ground-State Preparation without Controlled Hamiltonian Evolutions
    Dhrumil Patel, Steven T. Flammia, Raul Garcia-Patron
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Optimal Query Complexity for Ground-State Preparation
    Boyang Chen, Minbo Gao, Xinzhao Wang +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Imaginary-time-enhanced feedback-based quantum algorithms for ground-state preparation
    Thanh Nguyen Van Long, Lan Nguyen Tran, Le Bin Ho
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossrefDOAJAPS
  5. Driven-Dissipative Ground State Preparation: Mixing Time and Randomness
    Paul Cazeaux, Marius Junge, Diyi Liu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{jeffery2026optimal,
  title = {{Optimal Ground-State Preparation with a Guiding State}},
  author = {Stacey Jeffery and Rolando D. Somma and Freek Witteveen and Ronald de Wolf},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.38091},
  eprint = {2609.38091},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38091},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Optimal Ground-State Preparation with a Guiding State
AU  - Stacey Jeffery
AU  - Rolando D. Somma
AU  - Freek Witteveen
AU  - Ronald de Wolf
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.38091
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38091
AB  - Suppose a Hamiltonian H has a unique ground state |ψ_0⟩ with an eigenvalue E_0, and we have an estimate Ẽ_0 such that |Ẽ_0−E_0|≤δ, and there is a gap of at least 3δ between E_0 and all other eigenvalues. Suppose we have a unitary A available that can produce a "guiding state'" A|0⟩ that has overlap at least γ with |ψ_0⟩. We show how to obtain an η-approximation of |ψ_0⟩ with probability at least 1−ε using O(log(1/ε)/γδ+ log(1/η)/δ) applications of U=e^iH its inverse, and O(log(1/ε)/γ) applications of A and its inverse. We give two different algorithms, one based on interleaving amplitude amplification and error-reduction in the style of [HMdW03], and one using the composition of transducers. This paper is the state-preparation follow-up to our two recent ground-state-energy estimation papers [JW26,SdW26]. Combined with the optimal energy-estimation of [JW26], our results show the claimed upper bound for ground-state preparation. The bound is optimal up to a constant factor in terms of the number of applications of U and U^† if ε=η, as follows from [SdW26]. In one of our approaches to ground state preparation, we construct transducers for amplitude amplification and LCU that might be of independent interest.
ER  -