The Influence of Obesity and Body Shape on Sagittal Plane Knee Kinematics and Kinetics during Obstacle Crossing
- 1Boston University
Abstract
Altered walking mechanics in individuals with obesity can contribute to knee osteoarthritis. The gait deviations may become more pronounced during obstacle crossing. In women, body fat distribution may further influence knee load, especially when excess fat accumulates in the thighs and hips. However, relatively little is known about how regional fat distribution affects gait in women with obesity. This study investigated how obesity and, among women, different fat distributions (Apple: more abdominal fat; Pear: more lower-limb fat) influence knee biomechanics during walking with and without obstacle crossing. Participants were 15 controls without obesity (NB) and 27 with obesity (OB). Within female participants, 10 without obesity (fNB) were compared with 20 with obesity, stratified by waist-hip ratio (Apple:10, Pear:10). Speed-adjusted statistical parametric mapping applied a general linear model (NB vs. OB) and an analysis of covariance (fNB vs. Apple vs. Pear). OB exhibited a significantly greater late-stance knee extension moment than NB across all tasks, and this difference persisted among fNB, Apple, and Pear in obstacle tasks (p<0.05). OB walked with reduced knee flexion during the early-stance leading limb after crossing a medium-height obstacle (p=0.048) and a high-height obstacle (p=0.008) compared to NB. There were significant body-shape effects (p<0.05), and post-hoc comparisons confirmed that Pear had lower knee angles than fNB in both leading-limb conditions after crossing medium- and high-height obstacles (p=0.008 and p=0.001, respectively). These findings suggest that obstacle crossing helps illuminate how excess weight influences knee biomechanics, and how regional fat distribution modulates the degree of this alteration.
Related
- How obstacle approach shapes rider biomechanics: Changes in kinematics, rein tension and stirrup forces during canter
- Yoga biomechanics through energy optimization: diverse kinematics and low-dimensional kinetics
- Influence of Habitat Use on Prey Capture Behavior and Kinematics in the Pyrenean Brook Newt ( Calotriton asper )
- The influence of arm swing constraint on thigh kinematics, heart rate response, and perceived exertion during the two-minute step test
- Guard cell size and initial conductance influence stomatal closure kinetics
BibTeX
@misc{choi2026influence,
title = {{The Influence of Obesity and Body Shape on Sagittal Plane Knee Kinematics and Kinetics during Obstacle Crossing}},
author = {C. W. Choi and C. L. Lewis and S. V. Gill},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.24.753943},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.753943v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The Influence of Obesity and Body Shape on Sagittal Plane Knee Kinematics and Kinetics during Obstacle Crossing
AU - C. W. Choi
AU - C. L. Lewis
AU - S. V. Gill
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/24
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.24.753943
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.24.753943v1
AB - Altered walking mechanics in individuals with obesity can contribute to knee osteoarthritis. The gait deviations may become more pronounced during obstacle crossing. In women, body fat distribution may further influence knee load, especially when excess fat accumulates in the thighs and hips. However, relatively little is known about how regional fat distribution affects gait in women with obesity. This study investigated how obesity and, among women, different fat distributions (Apple: more abdominal fat; Pear: more lower-limb fat) influence knee biomechanics during walking with and without obstacle crossing. Participants were 15 controls without obesity (NB) and 27 with obesity (OB). Within female participants, 10 without obesity (fNB) were compared with 20 with obesity, stratified by waist-hip ratio (Apple:10, Pear:10). Speed-adjusted statistical parametric mapping applied a general linear model (NB vs. OB) and an analysis of covariance (fNB vs. Apple vs. Pear). OB exhibited a significantly greater late-stance knee extension moment than NB across all tasks, and this difference persisted among fNB, Apple, and Pear in obstacle tasks (p<0.05). OB walked with reduced knee flexion during the early-stance leading limb after crossing a medium-height obstacle (p=0.048) and a high-height obstacle (p=0.008) compared to NB. There were significant body-shape effects (p<0.05), and post-hoc comparisons confirmed that Pear had lower knee angles than fNB in both leading-limb conditions after crossing medium- and high-height obstacles (p=0.008 and p=0.001, respectively). These findings suggest that obstacle crossing helps illuminate how excess weight influences knee biomechanics, and how regional fat distribution modulates the degree of this alteration.
ER -