Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Joint Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Beta Regression for Panel Data with Higher-Order Autoregressive Errors

Abstract

Existing panel beta regression estimators do not accommodate higher-order autoregressive dependence within a joint likelihood framework. We develop such an estimator: a joint conditional maximum-likelihood beta-AR(k) model extended from a single time series to panel data, and extend it to panel inference through two new covariance estimators - a generalization of Beck-Katz panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) and a Driscoll-Kraay-style alternative (DK) - to account for the cross-panel dependence the extension introduces. The estimator is evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation spanning AR(1)-AR(3) error structures, three panel sizes, and five series lengths, under both independent panels and genuine cross-panel dependence, against an uncorrected baseline. PCSE generally exhibited superior Type I error control and coverage relative to DK, at a power cost that was modest and partly illusory given DK's own miscalibration. Under genuine cross-panel dependence, the uncorrected estimator's Type I error was severe and did not diminish with additional data, while both corrections resolved it, with PCSE again preferred. An illustrative multi-site disease management example is provided, along with a Stata implementation (xtbetark).

Related

  1. Unrestricted conditional maximum likelihood estimation for a Fréchet regression model
    Marcio Reverbel, Johan Segers
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Generalized Linear Mixed Models
    Luca Maestrini, Francis K. C. Hui, A. H. Welsh
    Statistical SciencePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text21 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  3. Existence and consistency of weighted maximum likelihood estimator for extreme quantile regression
    Lucien M. Vidagbandji, Alexandre Berred, Cyrille Bertelle +1
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityStatisticsHALarXiv
  4. Connecting Score Matching, Maximum Likelihood, and Expectation-Maximization in Mixed Linear Regression
    Zhankun Luo, Abolfazl Hashemi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Likelihood Ratio Tests for the Power Spherical Distribution
    Sharindi Amasha Samaraweera, Leif Ellingson
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{linden2026joint,
  title = {{Joint Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Beta Regression for Panel Data with Higher-Order Autoregressive Errors}},
  author = {Ariel Linden},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.26226},
  eprint = {2609.26226},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26226},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Joint Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Beta Regression for Panel Data with Higher-Order Autoregressive Errors
AU  - Ariel Linden
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.26226
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26226
AB  - Existing panel beta regression estimators do not accommodate higher-order autoregressive dependence within a joint likelihood framework. We develop such an estimator: a joint conditional maximum-likelihood beta-AR(k) model extended from a single time series to panel data, and extend it to panel inference through two new covariance estimators - a generalization of Beck-Katz panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) and a Driscoll-Kraay-style alternative (DK) - to account for the cross-panel dependence the extension introduces. The estimator is evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation spanning AR(1)-AR(3) error structures, three panel sizes, and five series lengths, under both independent panels and genuine cross-panel dependence, against an uncorrected baseline. PCSE generally exhibited superior Type I error control and coverage relative to DK, at a power cost that was modest and partly illusory given DK's own miscalibration. Under genuine cross-panel dependence, the uncorrected estimator's Type I error was severe and did not diminish with additional data, while both corrections resolved it, with PCSE again preferred. An illustrative multi-site disease management example is provided, along with a Stata implementation (xtbetark).
ER  -