Axiomatic Incompatibility Between Thermal Equilibrium and Volume-Dependent Entropy in Ideal Gas Theory
Abstract
A rigorous macroscopic analysis of classical thermodynamics reveals an overlooked contradiction at the foundations of ideal gas theory: the traditional volume dependent formula for entropy violates the fundamental axiom of thermal equilibrium during reversible isothermal processes. This paper resolves this inconsistency by establishing a strict operational distinction between strictly isothermal and quasi isothermal processes. We show that in order for the perfect gas to be strictly consistent with the laws of classical thermodynamics, the thermodynamic entropy of a perfect gas must be a function of temperature only. This independence of volume is also confirmed by a new analysis of the adiabatic free expansion of an ideal gas, which is found to be intrinsically reversible. To reconcile these results with standard thermodynamic practice, we introduce the concept of a pseudo isothermal process (a finite sequence of small adiabatic and isochoric steps) and show that the classical equations for work and heat apply rigorously to these real processes, as opposed to strictly isothermal ones. We conclude by discussing the profound implications of these findings for statistical mechanics, showing that while the corrected thermodynamic entropy is in perfect agreement with Maxwell's kinetic theory, it is essentially different from the Planck Boltzmann formula. Thus, thermodynamic entropy and statistical microstate counting are two different physical quantities, and the present analysis provides a simple way to free classical thermodynamics from the paradoxes of microscopic disorder.
Related
- The entropy of black hole under second-order deviation from equilibrium
- The Pauli-Villars-Regularised Dirac Field Coupled to Electromagnetic Fields at Thermal Equilibrium
- Approximating thermodynamic equilibrium observables of quasi one-dimensional magnetic molecules and chains by thermal DMRG - a user perspective
- Thermal equilibrium in general relativity and the special nature of the cosmological constant
- Noise-Induced Restoration of Entropy Concavity Near Gaussian Equilibrium
BibTeX
@misc{paglietti2026axiomatic,
title = {{Axiomatic Incompatibility Between Thermal Equilibrium and Volume-Dependent Entropy in Ideal Gas Theory}},
author = {Andrea Paglietti},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.10645},
eprint = {2610.10645},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10645},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Axiomatic Incompatibility Between Thermal Equilibrium and Volume-Dependent Entropy in Ideal Gas Theory
AU - Andrea Paglietti
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.10645
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10645
AB - A rigorous macroscopic analysis of classical thermodynamics reveals an overlooked contradiction at the foundations of ideal gas theory: the traditional volume dependent formula for entropy violates the fundamental axiom of thermal equilibrium during reversible isothermal processes. This paper resolves this inconsistency by establishing a strict operational distinction between strictly isothermal and quasi isothermal processes. We show that in order for the perfect gas to be strictly consistent with the laws of classical thermodynamics, the thermodynamic entropy of a perfect gas must be a function of temperature only. This independence of volume is also confirmed by a new analysis of the adiabatic free expansion of an ideal gas, which is found to be intrinsically reversible. To reconcile these results with standard thermodynamic practice, we introduce the concept of a pseudo isothermal process (a finite sequence of small adiabatic and isochoric steps) and show that the classical equations for work and heat apply rigorously to these real processes, as opposed to strictly isothermal ones. We conclude by discussing the profound implications of these findings for statistical mechanics, showing that while the corrected thermodynamic entropy is in perfect agreement with Maxwell's kinetic theory, it is essentially different from the Planck Boltzmann formula. Thus, thermodynamic entropy and statistical microstate counting are two different physical quantities, and the present analysis provides a simple way to free classical thermodynamics from the paradoxes of microscopic disorder.
ER -