Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDJournal of the American Heart Association

Machine‐Learning Prediction of Tumor Comorbidity and Cancer‐Associated Mortality in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A 2‐Stage Modeling Study

1 more authors
  1. 1Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  2. 2Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  3. 3Peking University First Hospital

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) with concomitant tumors is increasingly prevalent and is associated with a higher mortality. We aimed to develop 2 predictive models to enable early identification of tumor risk in patients with CHD and mortality risk in those with CHD and cancer. METHODS: We analyzed 134 141 patients with CHD treated at Tongji Hospital (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China) during 2001 to 2023. Data collected from the First Hospital of Peking University (Beijing, China) were used for external validation. We developed and evaluated 6 machine learning models (extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, random forest, neural network, decision tree, and logistic regression). Model explainability was improved using Shapley additive explanation, and an online prediction platform was subsequently implemented. RESULTS: For the model of predicting tumor risk in patients with CHD, extreme gradient boosting showed the best performance in the test set (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve =0.935), achieving the lowest Brier score (0.080). Its sensitivity, accuracy, and F1 score were 0.740, 0.882, and 0.751, respectively. Meanwhile, light gradient boosting machine performed well for in-hospital mortality prediction in the test set (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve =0.965), achieving the lowest Brier score (0.019), and the highest sensitivity (0.677), and F1 score (0.599). The 2 models also showed good performance in the external validation, suggesting a degree of generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: We constructed 2 predictive models to assess the risk of tumor and cancer-associated mortality in patients with CHD. The web platform assists clinicians in decision-making and patient management.

Related

  1. Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of mortality in ICU patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure
    Jiayi Shen, Yucheng Liu, Yikun Chen
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    Lei Pan, Zilong Xiao, Ziqing Yu +8
    Journal of cardiovascular development and diseasePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  3. Association of the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index with Clinical Course and Mortality in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
    Tugba Onyilmaz, Gozde Oksuzler Kizilbay, Huseyin Kaya +4
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Real-world evidence of physical comorbidity patterns and all-cause mortality in patients with mental disorders.
    Zuolin Lu, Elaine He Xu, Yunyuan Kong +2
    General psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. A machine learning-driven and explainable prediction model for in-hospital mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure: integrating XGBoost and SHAP approaches.
    Jingru Hu, Shiqiong Su, Dongdong Liu
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{zheng2026machinelearning,
  title = {{Machine‐Learning Prediction of Tumor Comorbidity and Cancer‐Associated Mortality in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A 2‐Stage Modeling Study}},
  author = {Wei Zheng and Hongsen Cai and Yahui Li and Man Huang and Qin Fang and Luyun Wang and Daowen Wang and Jie Jiang and Yan Zhang and Hu Ding and Wenguang Hou and Hongling Zhu and Yan Wang},
  journal = {Journal of the American Heart Association},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1161/jaha.126.051025},
  url = {https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.126.051025},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Machine‐Learning Prediction of Tumor Comorbidity and Cancer‐Associated Mortality in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A 2‐Stage Modeling Study
AU  - Wei Zheng
AU  - Hongsen Cai
AU  - Yahui Li
AU  - Man Huang
AU  - Qin Fang
AU  - Luyun Wang
AU  - Daowen Wang
AU  - Jie Jiang
AU  - Yan Zhang
AU  - Hu Ding
AU  - Wenguang Hou
AU  - Hongling Zhu
AU  - Yan Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Journal of the American Heart Association
DO  - 10.1161/jaha.126.051025
UR  - https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.126.051025
AB  - BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) with concomitant tumors is increasingly prevalent and is associated with a higher mortality. We aimed to develop 2 predictive models to enable early identification of tumor risk in patients with CHD and mortality risk in those with CHD and cancer. METHODS: We analyzed 134 141 patients with CHD treated at Tongji Hospital (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China) during 2001 to 2023. Data collected from the First Hospital of Peking University (Beijing, China) were used for external validation. We developed and evaluated 6 machine learning models (extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, random forest, neural network, decision tree, and logistic regression). Model explainability was improved using Shapley additive explanation, and an online prediction platform was subsequently implemented. RESULTS: For the model of predicting tumor risk in patients with CHD, extreme gradient boosting showed the best performance in the test set (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve =0.935), achieving the lowest Brier score (0.080). Its sensitivity, accuracy, and F1 score were 0.740, 0.882, and 0.751, respectively. Meanwhile, light gradient boosting machine performed well for in-hospital mortality prediction in the test set (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve =0.965), achieving the lowest Brier score (0.019), and the highest sensitivity (0.677), and F1 score (0.599). The 2 models also showed good performance in the external validation, suggesting a degree of generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: We constructed 2 predictive models to assess the risk of tumor and cancer-associated mortality in patients with CHD. The web platform assists clinicians in decision-making and patient management.
SN  - 2047-9980
ER  -