Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Public Health

Leveraging digital and media literacy for effective health communication in maternal and HIV care during pandemics in Uganda

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 misinformation disrupted maternal and HIV services, shaping risk perceptions, care-seeking, and treatment adherence. This study explores stakeholders’ perspectives on leveraging digital and media literacy for effective health communication in maternal and HIV care during pandemics in Uganda.

Methods: This qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted between March and July 2025 and explored retrospective experiences from the 2020–2022 COVID-19 period. A total of 136 individuals participated in the study. We conducted 28 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with women living with HIV. Fourteen focus group discussions (FGDs) (two per site, six participants per group) were conducted with 84 HIV-negative participants from the community. Twenty-four key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted with health workers, policymakers, Community Advisory Board members and HIV activists. Recall bias was possible because participants reflected on past pandemic experiences; however, probing, contextual prompts, and triangulation enhanced data quality. Data were analysed inductively using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic framework and subsequently mapped onto Kleinman’s explanatory model.

Results: Six themes were generated: access to maternal and HIV information through digital and media channels; understanding and evaluating health information; digital media as a tool for health communication and service continuity; challenges in accessing, understanding, and using health information; social and contextual influences on information use and recommendations for strengthening digital and media literacy, health communication, and maternal and HIV care during pandemics. Participants recommended strengthening digital and media literacy, improving digital access, providing local-language content, ensuring consistent messaging, and integrating digital, mass media, and community-based communication approaches.

Conclusion: The study shows that misinformation, social and cultural beliefs, and limited access to digital health information influenced how people understood COVID-19 and used health services. These factors affected trust in health messages and care-seeking, especially for maternal and HIV care. Improving clear communication, access to reliable information, and digital inclusion is important for future public health responses.

Related

  1. Preparedness for maternal and offspring health surveillance in pandemics: Lessons learned from studies on COVID‐19 using Scandinavian registry data
    Maria C. Magnus, Stine Kjaer Urhoj, Anne K. Örtqvist +3
    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica ScandinavicaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMCDOAJ
  2. Leveraging women empowerment for better maternal health: using the SWPER index to identify key drivers of quality antenatal care in Southern Africa
    Munawar Harun Koray, Evelina Ndapewa Johannes, Emmanuel Kwasi Afriyie +1
    Frontiers in global women's healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Trusted messengers in everyday spaces: leveraging community expertise to support early language and literacy
    Susan B. Neuman, Lauren Krieger
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
  4. Maternal health literacy and access to maternal healthcare among migrant mothers in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Trishika Wickramarathne, Abdul Baten, Maja Nedeljkovic +2
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Association between familiarity with health literacy and health professionals’ use of health literacy-responsive communication techniques
    Hassan Mahmoodi, Reza Negarandeh, Yadolah Zarezadeh +2
    BMC Health Services ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{twimukye2026leveraging,
  title = {{Leveraging digital and media literacy for effective health communication in maternal and HIV care during pandemics in Uganda}},
  author = {Adelline Twimukye and Catriona Waitt and Charles Owuor Olungah},
  journal = {BMC Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-29746-3},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29746-3},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Leveraging digital and media literacy for effective health communication in maternal and HIV care during pandemics in Uganda
AU  - Adelline Twimukye
AU  - Catriona Waitt
AU  - Charles Owuor Olungah
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - BMC Public Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12889-026-29746-3
UR  - https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29746-3
AB  - Background: COVID-19 misinformation disrupted maternal and HIV services, shaping risk perceptions, care-seeking, and treatment adherence. This study explores stakeholders’ perspectives on leveraging digital and media literacy for effective health communication in maternal and HIV care during pandemics in Uganda.  Methods: This qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted between March and July 2025 and explored retrospective experiences from the 2020–2022 COVID-19 period. A total of 136 individuals participated in the study. We conducted 28 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with women living with HIV. Fourteen focus group discussions (FGDs) (two per site, six participants per group) were conducted with 84 HIV-negative participants from the community. Twenty-four key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted with health workers, policymakers, Community Advisory Board members and HIV activists. Recall bias was possible because participants reflected on past pandemic experiences; however, probing, contextual prompts, and triangulation enhanced data quality. Data were analysed inductively using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic framework and subsequently mapped onto Kleinman’s explanatory model.  Results: Six themes were generated: access to maternal and HIV information through digital and media channels; understanding and evaluating health information; digital media as a tool for health communication and service continuity; challenges in accessing, understanding, and using health information; social and contextual influences on information use and recommendations for strengthening digital and media literacy, health communication, and maternal and HIV care during pandemics. Participants recommended strengthening digital and media literacy, improving digital access, providing local-language content, ensuring consistent messaging, and integrating digital, mass media, and community-based communication approaches.  Conclusion: The study shows that misinformation, social and cultural beliefs, and limited access to digital health information influenced how people understood COVID-19 and used health services. These factors affected trust in health messages and care-seeking, especially for maternal and HIV care. Improving clear communication, access to reliable information, and digital inclusion is important for future public health responses.
SN  - 1471-2458
ER  -