Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYScientific Reports

An exploratory animal-economics study to evaluate the motivation of group-housed rabbit does to access different secluded areas

  1. 1Department of Agricultura, Food and Environmental Science, University of Perugia
  2. 2Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova

Abstract

Eight New Zealand White nulliparous rabbit does (Oryctolagus cuniculus) were housed in two customised motivational pens, each comprising a central group area (feeders and drinkers) connected to four individual compartments containing different enrichment resources: none-control, hiding box, sand, and straw. The system required the rabbit does to push a transparent door to gain access to the compartments. The workload became progressively heavier at 48-hour intervals (ranging from 0 to 150 g of added weight) during an 8-day test period. This experimental setup was replicated across four consecutive trials (in total 32 trial days), and behavioral data were video-recorded for 60 min per day. Outcomes evaluated included time-budget allocation (group vs. individual areas, and specific resource choices within the individual areas), daily visits per doe, visit probability, and a comprehensive suite of animal-economics indices (elasticity of demand, expenditure rate, consumer surplus, and effort budget allocation). The results demonstrated that does spent significantly more time in the central group area than in the individual compartments overall; however, this allocation was strongly influenced by the door weight. Among the individual compartments, the zone containing straw accounted for the highest time allocation (17.5%), followed by the hiding box (8.6%), the empty control (3.0%), and sand (1.8%). Daily visits to these individual areas systematically declined as the workload cost increased, showing distinct motivational differences among the resources (straw > hiding box > control > sand). In conclusion, these preliminary behavioral trends suggest that individual seclusion could be considered a price-dependent, non-essential resource for nulliparous rabbits under these conditions. Beyond these specific behavioral findings, this study successfully validates a robust methodological framework. By integrating standardized pen architecture, controlled workload increments, automated door systems, and animal-economics processing indices, this model establishes a scalable framework. This standardized methodology can be reliably adapted in future research to decouple confounding environmental factors and systematically evaluate the behavioral priorities of reproducing does across diverse commercial husbandry systems and physiological stages.

Related

  1. Effect of leaf economics spectrum, mycorrhizal type and phylogeny on leaf nutrient resorption in a temperate urban forest
    Yuan Wang, Xiaoman Cui, Lei Wang +4
    Annals of BotanyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textPlant biologyPMC
  2. Reproductive Efficiency: The Economics of Calving Intervals and Distributions
    Angela M. Gonella-Diaza, Kalyn Waters, Hannah Baker
    EDISPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPlant biologyDOAJ
  3. Biodiversity Economics in the Field: The Values of Crop Diversity for Farmers
    François Bareille
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyHAL
  4. 1079 Development of a biologically aligned ex vivo TumorGraft3D platform to evaluate STC-1010-mediated immune priming and colorectal tumor killing
    Francois Ghiringhelli, Ignacio Melero, Maria Mancini +8
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyDOAJ
  5. On the relationship between root economics and plant hydraulic traits
    Anvar Sanaei, Srijna Saxena, Kevin E Mueller +16
    New PhytologistPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyPlant biologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{bosco2026exploratory,
  title = {{An exploratory animal-economics study to evaluate the motivation of group-housed rabbit does to access different secluded areas}},
  author = {Alessandro Dal Bosco and Marco Birolo and Simona Mattioli and Luigia Bosa and Marta Vispi and Cesare Castellini},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-62527-x},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62527-x},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - An exploratory animal-economics study to evaluate the motivation of group-housed rabbit does to access different secluded areas
AU  - Alessandro Dal Bosco
AU  - Marco Birolo
AU  - Simona Mattioli
AU  - Luigia Bosa
AU  - Marta Vispi
AU  - Cesare Castellini
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-62527-x
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62527-x
AB  - Eight New Zealand White nulliparous rabbit does (Oryctolagus cuniculus) were housed in two customised motivational pens, each comprising a central group area (feeders and drinkers) connected to four individual compartments containing different enrichment resources: none-control, hiding box, sand, and straw. The system required the rabbit does to push a transparent door to gain access to the compartments. The workload became progressively heavier at 48-hour intervals (ranging from 0 to 150 g of added weight) during an 8-day test period. This experimental setup was replicated across four consecutive trials (in total 32 trial days), and behavioral data were video-recorded for 60 min per day. Outcomes evaluated included time-budget allocation (group vs. individual areas, and specific resource choices within the individual areas), daily visits per doe, visit probability, and a comprehensive suite of animal-economics indices (elasticity of demand, expenditure rate, consumer surplus, and effort budget allocation). The results demonstrated that does spent significantly more time in the central group area than in the individual compartments overall; however, this allocation was strongly influenced by the door weight. Among the individual compartments, the zone containing straw accounted for the highest time allocation (17.5%), followed by the hiding box (8.6%), the empty control (3.0%), and sand (1.8%). Daily visits to these individual areas systematically declined as the workload cost increased, showing distinct motivational differences among the resources (straw > hiding box > control > sand). In conclusion, these preliminary behavioral trends suggest that individual seclusion could be considered a price-dependent, non-essential resource for nulliparous rabbits under these conditions. Beyond these specific behavioral findings, this study successfully validates a robust methodological framework. By integrating standardized pen architecture, controlled workload increments, automated door systems, and animal-economics processing indices, this model establishes a scalable framework. This standardized methodology can be reliably adapted in future research to decouple confounding environmental factors and systematically evaluate the behavioral priorities of reproducing does across diverse commercial husbandry systems and physiological stages.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -